Would be quite ironic if he was to be pushed out wide to accommodate another striker
This.Maybe he will develop into the striker so many here thought he would or maybe he won't. Only time will tell.
It was never going to happens straight away though. Arsenal fans can expect the same frustrating version of Welbcek we've become accustomed to for the short term at least. Difference is that version of Welbeck actually deserves a place in their attack whereas he doesn't in ours.
These early games aren't going to prove anything one way or another.
I've always been a big Welbeck fan. Think he has exceptional technical ability and is blessed with fantastic physical attributes (that's what she said..arf), but whenever he broke through on goal, you always felt he was either going to produce a sublime finish or rather more likely, completely goof it up. He doesn't do the simple (in front of goal) well. More likely to score with a flicked back heel than in a one on one.
Spent the last few years at United waiting for him to put it all together and hoping that he would. But now he's left, a part of me likes watching him stay true to form (inconsistent) because it'd be hard to stomach all that nurturing, only for Le Arse to benefit. So far he's not giving me too much to worry about.
I really don't know where people are getting 20 goals a season as a prediction from. I do think that once Giroud comes back then Wenger will deploy Welbeck out wide, which I know is something he would rather not happen to him.
Would he even get out wide for Arsenal? Certainly would not pick him over Ozil + Sanchez and Wenger loves Walcott's pace.
I think today showed one of the major reasons we let him go, he just not have the composure with his finishing. Every striker misses, how ever if Danny is one on one, i always have the feeling he'll make the wrong choice and he often does.
Its my specialty.Ok, 'happiest given his realistic options in the long run'.
And they say posters on here can tend toward the pedantic...
So many weird hurt feelings in here, it clear some of you are actually looking to take pleasure is seeing him fail (and its only been 2 games for Arsenal so far) which is weird for supporters of a club that has always been close to its youth prospects no matter whether they are moved on or serve the club well for a matter of years. When that player is somebody who comes across as a nice person and has served the club well on more than a few occasions before (rightly IMO) deciding to move on then its just weird and childish.
Luckily he has plenty of time to make a few on here look stupid over the next 10 years or so of his career.
For all the stick Giroud gets (plenty of it unwarranted) he's a far better striker than Welbeck. I'm glad we got rid as he clearly wasn't happy here any longer and he simply wasn't effective. In saying that, I would have happily kept him if he wanted to stay and be a squad player. He was useful for certain games, but his use was never really goals - which is why I was kind of shocked when Arsenal signed him. They need an out-and-out striker and Hernandez would have been a better fit.
I really don't see him improving much beyond what he is and I imagine he will be down the pecking order at Arsenal in a season or two when they buy a top-class striker.
I watched the match with my brother last night (Arsenal fan) and he just doesn't get the Welbeck signing. He actually said at one point last night "he's one of the worst finishers I've ever seen" - obviously it was heat of the moment but his finishing really was woeful. But the classic Caf debate is still raging all these years later: "if he was a good finisher, he would be a top striker" - classic logic right there.
He's 24. He shouldn't be "developing", he should be more or less the completed article at that age. You are "developing" at the age of 18-22 or so. How much longer does he need to develop? Will he still be developing at 27/28?
Wenger stated rather cryptically that he wouldn't have been signed on deadline day if he (Wenger) had been there. Did he mean he only wanted him on short term loan until January to cover for Giroud and/or any other absence, then he would have punted him back to us?
Definitely Not good enough for us, maybe good enough as a back-up at Arsenal. Definitely not the top class striker a top club needs.
For all the stick Giroud gets (plenty of it unwarranted) he's a far better striker than Welbeck. I'm glad we got rid as he clearly wasn't happy here any longer and he simply wasn't effective. In saying that, I would have happily kept him if he wanted to stay and be a squad player. He was useful for certain games, but his use was never really goals - which is why I was kind of shocked when Arsenal signed him. They need an out-and-out striker and Hernandez would have been a better fit.
I really don't see him improving much beyond what he is and I imagine he will be down the pecking order at Arsenal in a season or two when they buy a top-class striker.
I watched the match with my brother last night (Arsenal fan) and he just doesn't get the Welbeck signing. He actually said at one point last night "he's one of the worst finishers I've ever seen" - obviously it was heat of the moment but his finishing really was woeful. But the classic Caf debate is still raging all these years later: "if he was a good finisher, he would be a top striker" - classic logic right there.
Last season Welbeck averaged 0.36 goals per league game. At the same age Benzema managed 0.3 goals per game, Didier Drogba 0.25, Ian Wright 0.24 & Dwight Yorke 0.16. Zidane and Yaya Toure are also examples of players who were still developing at that age. Indeed Toure was only just starting to show his ability at that age after a not very memorable career to date. Not saying he'll reach those levels (he won't) but it's not true to say he should be basically the finished article now.
You can trot out all the stats you want but There are lots more players who will have had similar stars and never improved.
The reality is to play for a top club at his age you need to perform now, not promise to improve in three it four years time with plenty of games under your belt. Arsenal wont wait long to drop him if he's not performing.
Fact is we have much better strikers and had Arsenal had one of the options we have he wouldn't even have ended up there.
The flaws is his game are evident to anyone watching - he needs umpteen chances to score. That's a major problem for a striker who wants to be playing at the very top level.
Strikers are judged on goals. He needs to score plenty of he'll drift down the league.
He well and truly reverted to type yesterday.
He's 24. He shouldn't be "developing", he should be more or less the completed article at that age. You are "developing" at the age of 18-22 or so. How much longer does he need to develop? Will he still be developing at 27/28?
Wenger stated rather cryptically that he wouldn't have been signed on deadline day if he (Wenger) had been there. Did he mean he only wanted him on short term loan until January to cover for Giroud and/or any other absence, then he would have punted him back to us?
Definitely Not good enough for us, maybe good enough as a back-up at Arsenal. Definitely not the top class striker a top club needs.
I don't disagree with your opinion. Do you have me confused with someone else or something?
It was clearly the right decision to sell him, can't believe we have people on here criticising LvG for it. He's not good enough to be a striker for Manchester United, it's that simple. Misses far too many chances.
I don't think finishing and composure is something you "have or you don't." The more he gets in positions to finish, and with the right mentality and mindset, he'll eventually get used to being in position to finish off chances. It's something similar to muscle memory.
The problem for Welbeck is he won't be loved for being a local lad or for being an academy graduate.
Plus he only has a limited time to impress before Giroud returns. But it is not realistic to think Welbeck is going to become prolific in front of goal just because he moved club.
Worse case, the pressure will build on his shoulders and then he will arguably be in a worse position than he was at Utd.
Last season Welbeck averaged 0.36 goals per league game. At the same age Benzema managed 0.3 goals per game, Didier Drogba 0.25, Ian Wright 0.24 & Dwight Yorke 0.16. Zidane and Yaya Toure are also examples of players who were still developing at that age. Indeed Toure was only just starting to show his ability at that age after a not very memorable career to date. Not saying he'll reach those levels (he won't) but it's not true to say he should be basically the finished article now.
I don't think finishing and composure is something you "have or you don't." The more he gets in positions to finish, and with the right mentality and mindset, he'll eventually get used to being in position to finish off chances. It's something similar to muscle memory.
I'm not arguing we should have kept him (or at least not on the basis of goalscoring record). Falcao is a significant step up on what we had before. However its just tosh to say that if a player isn't the finished article aged 24 then he'll never improve. That mentality will only serve to harm the chances of other young players coming through.
I don't think this true, the very best strikers are naturally composed in front of goal. Can't think of many top strikers who have gone from poor finishers to clinical, you either have it or you don't.
I don't know where your stats are from but at Welbeck's age...
...Yorke's scoring stats were roughly 0.5 goals per game
...Benzema's just over 0.5 and
...Didier Drogba's roughly 0.6
Numbers are from www.soccerbase.com
They were all clearly closer to being the finished article then than Danny unfortunately will ever be.
That was from another article, but going by wikipedia, taking the season in which they turned 23, I get the following
- Drogba - Guincamp 01/02 season - 3 in 11
- Benzema - Real - 09/10 season- 9 in 33
- Yorke - Villa 94/95 season - 6 in 37
Obviously, that was only his second start of the season so drawing long-term conclusions would be kind of daft.
That said, if he keeps fluffing chances as badly as he did last night then I'll find myself in the unusual position of being delighted to be proven spectacularly wrong about a player. Of course, this will be mitigated by the growing evidence that I've been proven spectacularly right about Ozil