ItsEssexRob
Has a slight gambling problem
Yeah. Drogba at his best was better.
Ok just checking, Obviously Daniel is currently better, the big mans 36!
Yeah. Drogba at his best was better.
Yes, some do. Footballers are people too and will react differently to being challenged. Some might become disillusioned, some will try too hard and thereby lose focus. Also you need to play in order to improve. That doesn't mean that their talent isn't worth nurturing. Isco has struggled since the arrival of Bale etc, would you so easily discard him too? I'm admittadly not old enough to talk about Veron and how his performances for us but from what I understand he was a major flop which probably helped Scholes in this example but either way Scholes was an exceptional talent.
Oh ffs why I am still so emotional about this?
It's like Cinderalla going off with the Prince's irritating, patronising mate! Where's our happy ending?
He will be brilliant for Arsenal
while we are stuck with Rapist's-touch Rooney, Crocked-full-time Van Persie, and Goes-to-the-highest-bidder Mercenary
I'll admit, I broke down and cried when I heard it first. feck this, I'm a man FFS RAWK
He'll be brilliant at Arsenal. Given a chance to play upfront he will thrive. We will regret this one.
Some might question that
He will be brilliant for Arsenal
while we are stuck with Rapist's-touch Rooney, Crocked-full-time Van Persie, and Goes-to-the-highest-bidder Mercenary
yep, our play would be betterSo you're saying that you'd be happy if Rooney had gone to Arsenal instead of Welbeck?
So you're saying that you'd be happy if Rooney had gone to Arsenal instead of Welbeck?
yep, our play would be better
yep, our play would be better
doneI would edit the touch bit as someone got banned a few weeks ago for that.
it is not really the same as phil. welbeck when given a chance up front has been quite good, and the only reason he hasn't been given a proper chance is because of Rooney and RvP's reputationsYou'd be happy to sell Rooney, one of our standout players for the last few years because you think our play would be better with a squad player at best (a fan favorite and a local lad)? How did you ever survive Phil Neville's transfer to Everton for 2 Million odd?
it is not really the same as phil. welbeck when given a chance up front has been quite good, and the only reason he hasn't been given a proper chance is because of Rooney and RvP's reputations
he was good enough when he actually got the opportunity to lead the line for a string of games.How is it not same as phil? Phil Neville played as a utility midfielder and played a major role (quite comically in some matches) in helping us win a few matches. He was moved on because of better players signing for United midfield. Welbeck has played a lot of minutes and he isn't prolific enough to lead the line unfortunately.
He is good enough to play for England. He will do a very good job for the gooners.
He will be our agent against the scousers,chavs and City.
no it doesn't. when it comes to all round play, there are few who can compete with him, even from England's past.That speaks more about the state of the England team than it does Welbeck's ability.
That speaks more about the state of the England team than it does Welbeck's ability.
no it doesn't. when it comes to all round play, there are few who can compete with him, even from England's past.