Hed Zitin
New Member
Apparently he's injured, which is probably Wenger code for you're not playing for England.
The majority of those 142 appearances have NOT been at centre forward though, correct? Ignoring those statistics would be stupid, yes, but mentioning the stats as if they paint the picture of the future is also stupid.
Anyway, it's a matter of opinion if you think he's going to be a 10, 15, 20, or 30 goal player for Arsenal. No one factually knows. But we'll soon find out.
For me Rooney, Ronaldo, Berbatov and Tevez represent exactly what a squad of WC players is about.
I've never been a huge fan, but still feel sad. Sad too about the fact that we seem to have turned into Chelsea or City.
Which isn't to say I won't enjoy seeing the new players and want them to do well - there's just that little grain of disappointment in the way things are going. But there's also excitement. Mixed feelings really, with more excitment than sadness, but even so...
van Persie did the same for us v Milan the year before, and that was before he had all those people up his channel.The Chip on Neuer was a prime example. Worked really hard, got into a great position and lacked the composure required at the top level. If he had scored that things may have been different.
van Persie has been guilty of a few poor misses for us to be honest, but Welbeck isn't a natural goalscorer. It is something Arsenal will have to work on.van Persie did the same for us v Milan the year before, and that was before he had all those people up his channel.
van Persie has been guilty of a few poor misses for us to be honest, but Welbeck isn't a natural goalscorer. It is something Arsenal will have to work on.
van Persie did the same for us v Milan the year before, and that was before he had all those people up his channel.
Even if he gets 15 league goals, how many more will he allow Sanchez to score or Ramsey to score with his off the ball running and pressing of defenders high up the pitch? Danny gave something to the squad that we don't have now, that's the crux of this whole thing as much as we try to downplay it.
Even if he gets 15 league goals, how many more will he allow Sanchez to score or Ramsey to score with his off the ball running and pressing of defenders high up the pitch? Danny gave something to the squad that we don't have now, that's the crux of this whole thing as much as we try to downplay it.
Wait til Welbeck is 28 and see how you feelAre you comparing the two as finishers? Or just two similar moments from two totally different careers?
I have no issue with Danny, I didn't knock him when he was here but I don't feel any great loss now he's gone. I can't remember, did you feel the same about Robin when he left to win the league with us?
van Persie has been guilty of a few poor misses for us to be honest, but Welbeck isn't a natural goalscorer. It is something Arsenal will have to work on.
Maybe so no worries all good.You've got to be trying to wind me up.
Granted the players you mentioned were all probably world class, my point was that we didn't have a squad of world class players. I mean, what team does? My comment before about Van Gaal aiming to have a squad full of world class players was a joke that was obviously taken too literally by yourself.
Wait til Welbeck is 28 and see how you feel
Wait til Welbeck is 28 and see how you feel
I think the Bayern miss is being over-played here.
Rooney missed a far easier chance against the same opposition and Van Persie should have scored at least a couple of goals in the tie that derailed our previous CL campaign (in a fixture where Welbeck did score and was arguably MOTM) Obviously, they both have credentials that Welbeck can only dream move but - as I keep saying - at the same age as he is now, the consensus on here was that Rooney's finishing wasn't up to scratch either.
If you focus on the goals Welbeck has scored - rather than those he missed - there's been an impressive range of finishes, including some absolute screamers and a disproportionate number of goals scored in high profile games (remember that sweet volley against City in the FA Cup?) which always bodes well for a young striker.
Rooney's strike rate was much better though, and steadily improved, and the out of position thing that derailed Welbecks stats didn't have the same effect on Wayne's. That and Wayne bossed games and imposed himself. Hie England and United debuts alone blow any Welbeck perfromance out of the water in my mind.
The goals Welbeck has scored are all very instinctive, he lacks the dead eye and coolness of a top finisher. He's not a bad player, but not a great one. And if we paid 16 million for him I think a lot of people would be pissed off.
I assume someone has said it already but is it totally against the realm of possibility that we would have included a buy back clause?
I've got a feeling he'll choose by himself to come back when LvG leaves.I assume someone has said it already but is it totally against the realm of possibility that we would have included a buy back clause?
At £16 million I dont think there's even a slight chance of that. Why would Arsenal agree to that?
While he has the potential to be worth that fee if hes starting weekly and scoring often for Arsenal, they are mostly paying for that potential because he's not currently a £15 million+ striker. If we had some kind of buyback option you can expect Arsenal would have paid a fair bit less
It's all very unfortunate. He may, he may not. Personally, I'd have kept him over say, RvP (especially with Falcao signed). But I think Welbeck wanted a guaranteed CF role, which LvG couldn't promise.This will bite United in the bum in about 3 or 4 years time, similar to the way we thought Sturridge was average so decided to sell him to a rival. He has talent but never felt hes been much cop at United, he clearly has got it though as he has shown for England of all places.
£16m is fair in my opinion. They were desperate and we didn't actually want to sell. Such a clause could have easily swayed it, especially if it was something a little extravagant like £30/£40m. The deal would work for both parties.
Either way, I highly doubt there is such a clause, just a thought that's all. You never know though, especially if he has the attachment to the club that people claim.
This will bite United in the bum in about 3 or 4 years time, similar to the way we thought Sturridge was average so decided to sell him to a rival. He has talent but never felt hes been much cop at United, he clearly has got it though as he has shown for England of all places.
I assume someone has said it already but is it totally against the realm of possibility that we would have included a buy back clause?
Liverpool 23 and counting... (soon be up to your 25)
Welbeck wanted to leave with a while now, Hernandez too, I'd say the two of them wanting to go, along with RvP possible surgery, meant they jumped at Falcao when he became an option, rather than Falcao forcing them out.A lot of arguments are about Welbeck plays much better if he's played at center, but even if he's on the team and we had not signed Falcao, he'll not be given that role with Rooney and Van Persie in the team. Apparently he was told that he had to play second fiddle to Rooney and RvP and once Falcao option materialized, the club went for him and Welbeck wanted to leave.
I dunno, do you see Sturridge firing Liverpool to the title? I don't. Costa and Drogba both much better centre-forwards.This will bite United in the bum in about 3 or 4 years time, similar to the way we thought Sturridge was average so decided to sell him to a rival. He has talent but never felt hes been much cop at United, he clearly has got it though as he has shown for England of all places.
Agree with the everything bar the bite us in the bum bit purely because we'l just buy a top striker and the fact that he'd never reach that level if he stayed here. Been saying it for a year now, he needed to leave to be the best he can be.