Robbie Boy
Full Member
He'll either do that, or put him on bench. Giroud is simply so much better than him.
Giroud is a far better number 9. There's a certain Arsenal fan in this thread who just won't accept it.
He'll either do that, or put him on bench. Giroud is simply so much better than him.
Giroud is a far better number 9. There's a certain Arsenal fan in this thread who just won't accept it.
@Mogget and @golden_blunder, you were saying?
Arse will achieve nothing with players like Welbeck up front.
Based on the performances of their wide players, he'd be lucky to not go directly onto their bench.Let's see how long it takes for him to start bitching about playing out wide. Giroud will start at Striker.
He's usually wrong on a lot of football matters now. With Moyes gone, his honeymoon of trolling us has finished.
That doesn't mean that I don't like pete though. He's still a great poster!
By wing I think you mean bench.Giroud is the better solo striker. Danny will be shifted to the wing again.
Personally i think thats his perfect position, but you wouldn't have him in that role ahead of a lot of number 10s.I still reckon he'd make a really good #10.
I still reckon he'd make a really good #10.
Giroud is a far better number 9. There's a certain Arsenal fan in this thread who just won't accept it.
Or, his best position might be exactly where most of his managers have played him, as a wing forward.I still reckon he'd make a really good #10.
I still reckon he'd make a really good #10.
What he really means is "he'd look better in a position where he's not really expected to score goals"Aren't you the one who always cries a mighty river about Welbeck?
I doubt it. He could do the pitbull job well from that position (like when he did a very good job against Alonso) but on most games, from number 10 it is required something different. Welbeck isn't intelligient enough, nor has a good passing range to play that position.I still reckon he'd make a really good #10.
Couldn't agree more. Still he might get the time to develop into a better striker under Wenger.Welbeck simply couldn't have scored the goal Giroud scored. ....
Welbeck's all-round game is good, but the one quality that makes a top striker is missing - the ability to put the ball in the net. That's the premier purpose of a striker, everything else is secondary.
Justified that he kept RvP instead?Typical Danny Welbeck performance, lots of running around, a very neat touches but poor fishing. Now with Giroud back he's place in the side could be under threat.
I bet LVG feels some what justified this morning.
Justified that he kept RvP instead?
That wasn't the choice he made at though. The choice was giving limited opportunities to either Welbeck or Wilson.Justified that he kept RvP instead?
Van Persie's finishing has been wank this season. And he offers so much less than Welbeck on the rest of the pitch.RvP didn't have a good game yesterday and is fair to say he has had a poor start to the season. That said if we need a goal and the chance was to fall to either of them, I'd much rather it be falling to Robins foot than Dannys.
Van Persie's finishing has been wank this season. And he offers so much less than Welbeck on the rest of the pitch.
It's like some people think that a striker's only responsibility is in the 6 yard box. DW brings others into play and stretches defences so that his teammates have more opportunities. I reckon a Welbeck+Rooney partnership would result in more goals for the team as a whole than a RvP+Rooney partnership. Of course, there's no way of proving that, but it's true to say we always played better as an XI whenever Welbeck was on the pitch.