GledTheRed
Full Member
I assume they can’t recruit a replacement until Ashworth has left so are they seriously petty enough to go without a DoF for 9 months because they think they’re proving some kind of point?
Looks like it the stupid cnuts.
I assume they can’t recruit a replacement until Ashworth has left so are they seriously petty enough to go without a DoF for 9 months because they think they’re proving some kind of point?
Decades?
What if he is bit shit?
3y max then do a review.
Does ETH get the same 2-3 years? As they've said the structure needs to be in place to give any manager a chanceHe’s the best in the business as evaluated by INEOS. So you wait a little to get your man. Only outright idiots will expect instant success within a year. Not happening. It will take 2-3 years to right the ship. Anyone saying otherwise is clueless.
I assume they can’t recruit a replacement until Ashworth has left so are they seriously petty enough to go without a DoF for 9 months because they think they’re proving some kind of point?
Its strange that dougie freedman turning them down didnt make these points register with them.I read about 90% of the Dan Ashforth thread on the Newcastle forum, and I must say, I'm baffled at their joy that he won't start for us likely until March 2025.
What they seem not to be able to grasp is that:
I know they have this one sided rivalry with us, but dear me.
- They will pay his full salary
- He won't do the work he has been paid for, requiring more obligations to be taken by the coach
- It never ends well when the coach is also doing the transfers as well, see Klopp's mistakes with Darwin and Sloboslai, 170m down the drain, Ten Hag mistake with Anthony. It's emotionally draining, not allowing you to focus on thr primary job, which is coaching
- Nobody will be willing to accept such a long gardening leave when accepting their job offer
- Makes them look petulant to ask for an extortionate fee, unheard in world football, again, affecting who they can hire next
If a company can still running without a certain position properly filled up for a year long, it usually indicates that position isn’t seen that important.
I read about 90% of the Dan Ashforth thread on the Newcastle forum, and I must say, I'm baffled at their joy that he won't start for us likely until March 2025.
What they seem not to be able to grasp is that:
I know they have this one sided rivalry with us, but dear me.
- They will pay his full salary
- He won't do the work he has been paid for, requiring more obligations to be taken by the coach
- It never ends well when the coach is also doing the transfers as well, see Klopp's mistakes with Darwin and Sloboslai, 170m down the drain, Ten Hag mistake with Anthony. It's emotionally draining, not allowing you to focus on thr primary job, which is coaching
- Nobody will be willing to accept such a long gardening leave when accepting their job offer
- Makes them look petulant to ask for an extortionate fee, unheard in world football, again, affecting who they can hire next
And he is already working for United and giving his views and input. Just makes zero senseNewcastle will be the ones paying him all this while by the way.
And he is already working for United and giving his views and input. Just makes zero sense
Its strange that dougie freedman turning them down didnt make these points register with them.
Newcastle hold the cards here and they aren't obligated to be doing anyone any favours. If Ashworth doesn't like it, he shouldn't have signed the contract. On United's side, it's pay up or shut up and wait. Newcastle have infinite money, so they can afford to keep him on and sabotage a direct rival in the process. And it's not like they are paying for two DoFs since they don't have anyone hired yet, which also means the rest of the club will have to pick up the slack anyway, Ashworth or not. In other words, if they let him go now their rival will have a DoF for the transfer window, but they still won't and someone like Howe will still have to do it. It is likely they will release him shortly after they find their man. Probably after the summer, or start of next year.
He'll be working remotely.
He'll be working remotely.
Does ETH get the same 2-3 years? As they've said the structure needs to be in place to give any manager a chance
Well we’ve been running without a director of football for over a decade, does that mean we don’t need one?
He definitely is though.He doesn't. It would be death kiss for his career.
Exactly. Thought that the new regime wants to make things better, instead of mimicking the failed one.
We're hiring no DoF since Feb. and prepare to wait until 2025.Which is why they’re hiring Ashworth as they deem him to be the best man for the job. It’s Newcastle who are acting like children and throwing their toys out of their pram.
Eh? What year is it?He'll have to be in the office with the rest, come on now.
We're hiring no DoF since Feb. and prepare to wait until 2025.
True. It seems like it's good enough for Ineos so far.We’ve also hired other football people in Berrada and Wilcox who are deemed to be capable of covering Ashworth’s duties while he’s on gardening leave. Hence why we’re happy to wait this out.
If that is taking place and to what extent is pure conjecture and wishful thinking. Even if it is, I severely doubt it's firing on all cylinders, or there wouldn't be such a fuss about it. Besides, it carries significant risk as well because Newcastle would be inclined to look out for it, and it would appear Ashworth isn't exactly a master of subtlety.
He'll have to be in the office with the rest, come on now.
Wilcox is acting up. So in all intents and purposes he will have the supportive structure and there can be no more excusesDoes ETH get the same 2-3 years? As they've said the structure needs to be in place to give any manager a chance
True. It seems like it's good enough for Ineos so far.
Newcastle still behaving like a pathetic tin pot club
Newcastle still behaving like a pathetic tin pot club
It is completely against common practice and unreasonable to demand such a high compensation including add onsDon't see the issue. He has gardening leave and hel serve it if Newcastle choose not to accept our level of compensation.
He can't make huge strides now anyway, and he doesn't get involved in transfers so I'm less bothered about making it for windows.
Please stop posting tweets from no mark twitter fan accounts who uses words like cashworth and theater of streams. What's they're saying is not even any news from any credible sources.
I’m fine with him seeing out his leave. He’ll have input and conversations with our management team as we put new systems and structures in place. Berrada and Wilcox can oversee day to day stuff for the time being, and the new organisational setup is going to take time to bed in anyway.
By the time he gets feet on the ground inside the club, we should be in a position to really start moving.
Newcastle will have spent a year paying a guy who doesn’t want to work for them, not to work for them, and we’ll have shown the days of paying stupid money in a panic are behind us.
What do you mean? How is it? Compensation has to be agreed. If it can't he has to serve gardening leave. Gardening leave is quite normal, many people do it.It is completely against common practice and unreasonable to demand such a high compensation including add ons
It doesn't matter. If they want to resort to immature insults to report something then they aren't worth anyone's time.Let's be honest, theatre of streams is not a bad pun.
It doesn't matter. If they want to resort to immature insults to report something then they aren't worth anyone's time.
You don't see any of the popular United aggregator accounts using those words. It's a poor choice of words and make it seem like the account is run by children.