You don't know what point scoring means? Read it up.
You're informing me of something I already know and disagree with (price condition inserted)? Alright, mate, that makes sense. Next time when you're discussing Lvgs team selection, do feel free to go around telling people who disagree with the selection, that LvG being the manager did in fact select the team and is paid to do so, you know, they're wrong. They'll love it!
That sentence in the middle doesn't even make any sense.
Wait, so does every players' "brand" follow the David Beckham trajectory? Or is he the only footballer with such an appeal post retirement/well after his peak? Also, how much have his clubs post Madrid actually benefitted from the brand? It's pointless if he largely made post of the moolah himself.
Of course he is. Noone suggested otherwise. But given his age he might not give us 5 great years which was the actual point being made.
Lol we're resorting to childish digs now?
You are grasping at straws, and you know it. The manager has been quoted as saying he likes Ronaldo and he is looking to sign him, which (as well as the reports) suggests that the suits(paid professionals) have weighed our options and have most likely given the go ahead, unless Gaal acts arbitrarily - which i highly doubt, surely this trumps the opinion of an individual on an internet forum.
The fact that you think the move is daft, and the club is still going ahead with it, definitely means you're wrong. The only reason we are actually talking about this, is because it is apparent we are in for him, which would most certainly not be the case if the suits thought it was
daft.
No. Not every player, but global phenomenons. If you actually read my posts to understand, and not to criticise, you'd have noticed the bits where i called Ronaldo a "commercial juggernaut" in the same vein as the Beckhams and Jordans of the world - entities that don't necessarily have to be active in their respective fields to increase their brand values and capitalise on endorsements.
I only brought up Beckham's post retirement earnings to trump this
It makes complete sense to compare his commercial appeal during his peak years to his post-peak years. While he is now the finished article in a commercial sense, he has scope for decline in terms of footballing ability and hence commercial appeal post 31. What is more marketable? A 28 year old balon dor winner, or a 34 year old past it footballer? That has to be taken into account as well as his current brand value. Besides I find the brand value talk a little overrated. Much of the moolah of his marketability will actually go to Ronaldo himself.
Now regarding the club capitalising on his brand, Ronaldo's presence in the squad would open the door to more commercial endorsements for the club as he is currently the most popular player in the world, this would open United to untapped markets and also strengthen our brand in existing markets. Not sure why i have to explain the perks of having such a global superstar in your team. And this is without mentioning shirt sales and brand image on products like Bulova watches,New Era hats, etc.
He is capable of giving us good years as everyone has said (you yourself suggested 4), there's no point touching on this.
Ultimately, this has been a long and hectic argument. The increase in the number of substantial reports and the fact that the manager has already spoken about potentially signing the individual - also given the situation at Madrid,suggests that he is very much on our radar, which also means the suits have taken all factors into consideration and given the go ahead - which i doubt they would've, if it were a
daft decision.
The argument about his brand value was as a result of my comments about Madrid's asking price, as i believe they have every right to demand such a hefty fee, given what they stand to lose in the commercial sense, to which you disagree, that's fine.
You don't think his brand is worth that much? you're entitled to your opinion. Hopefully I've covered everything.