I'm not sure I agree, I just think they are different type of forwards, and Jackson has certain attributes over Hojlund that makes him better on the eye. The thing Hojlund has over Jackson, which is the most important part really, is he's way more clinical. If he had the same amount of chances Jackson enjoyed last season, ignoring everything else, I'm sure he'd manage more than the 17 goals Jackson scored. Jackson is a huge part of why a lot of those chances get created in the first place though, for himself and for others, which is where I think he excels over Hojlund.
I love both players. I think they're at a similar level generally speaking, but I think Jackson edges it at the moment. Interesting players to compare over the next couple of years (if Chelsea and United keep letting them play).