Andycoleno9
matchday malcontent
Juve. But 2nd team didn't got those titles (i think)Has any team ever had titles stripped off them?
Juve. But 2nd team didn't got those titles (i think)Has any team ever had titles stripped off them?
Didn’t you get a transfer ban for breaking various rules?
Juventus.Has any team ever had titles stripped off them?
Has any team ever had titles stripped off them?
Juventus.
Juve.
In England?Juve. But 2nd team didn't got those titles (i think)
Marseille, too. (And PSG refused the vacant title.)Juventus.
In this context, I would think of it more that they gained an unfair advantage if the allegations are true. I don't think it falls into the realms of blatant cheating like bribery, match-fixing and corruption. I think only those would result in stripping of honours for the years in scope.It is blatant cheating though. They’ve spent money the rules said they couldn’t. They don’t win those titles without doing that.
In this context, I would think of it more that they gained an unfair advantage if the allegations are true. I don't think it falls into the realms of blatant cheating like bribery, match-fixing and corruption. I think only those would result in stripping of honours for the years in scope.
I get what you mean though, they have cheated their way in a sense, but not in the blatant way that the governing bodies would need to see.
Juventus was punished for one transfer. In City's case, we're talking about 100 breaches of FFP regulations, if they get the same punishment it will be laughable.I think we can all agree that the punishments that would be appropriate-relegation, multiple years of bans of transfers/european competition-will never happen. So I hope that at the very least they are proven guilty and we can officially recognize that which every football fan has known for a decade-they are a bunch of cheating cnuts.
They are going to get a penalty. That penalty won’t be as drastic as it should be, but somewhat heavy. Than it will be reduced on appeal to virtually nothing and everything will continue the same.
Anyone who thinks an example will be made of City is deluded.
Weak spined corporates will more likely impose an absolutely ludicrous punishment such as a £150,000 fine.
Expect no justice.
I think the word you’re looking for is corrupt.I do fully expect that in the end the punishment will massively underwhelm and not fit the crimes. It’s just football is how, certainly in this country.
I do fully expect that in the end the punishment will massively underwhelm and not fit the crimes. It’s just football is how, certainly in this country.
That 15 million £ penalty they are going to get in the end will cripple them. Just trust the FA.I do fully expect that in the end the punishment will massively underwhelm and not fit the crimes. It’s just football is how, certainly in this country.
We won't see them stripped of any titles I would think. That would be reserved for match-fixing and blatant cheating.
The recent points deduction of Juventus is probably a good benchmark for what we can expect. Probably a chunky points deduction and a hefty fine. Maybe a transfer ban too?
Pipe down, no one caresI see lots of mention Chelsea will be next to be investigated, but why?
We've never been suspected of cooking the books like City have. Sure the club have posted financial losses, and sure Abramovich injected a lot of money into the club over the years but unlike City's owner spending masked as dodgy sponsorship deals the Abramovich investment was always done completely out in the open and there were never any rules preventing him from doing so, as long as the club still stayed within the boundaries of the FFP rules which we always did because for starters the FFP rules allow for a ton of deductibles and even after all that they still allow for clubs to post a fixed amount of losses over the monitoring period as long as they are covered by the club owner. Maybe the rules are/were flawed that he was allowed to do it but you can't change the rules for past seasons.
In City's case the charge is that they cooked the books and would have failed FFP if they hadn't so it's all very different to what's been going on at Chelsea. Nobody would have prevented City from doing things the same way we have but if they did they just wouldn't have been able to spend as much money because when the FFP rules became a thing their starting point was much lower than ours. The timing is key here. When Abramovich bought Chelsea and made all those huge money investments in 2003-2010 there was no FFP yet, which allowed us to openly post massive losses and gain higher revenues through legit sponsorships etc. due to already being competitive over a multitude of years. When FFP rules were implemented we were already in a better position where the club still wasn't profitable but could continue to operate within the rules and using owner money to cover the allowed losses.
As for Chelsea's spending since the ownership change, it's again all out in the open and the club are not trying to hide anything. It's a shit load of money invested in new players but I don't think there's anyone claiming we're boosting our revenues with fake sponsorships and/or making off the books payments to clubs/agents/players to hide the costs. There's every chance this high-risk strategy causes the club to fail FFP monitoring and leads to some sanctions down the line if we fail to make CL in the coming seasons and also fail to increase other revenues, but as for right now we haven't fallen foul of any rule yet and if the high-risk strategy works out in our favor we might never do so. If we do fail FFP, there will be immediate sanctions that don't need this kind of further investigating because the accounts will already show how much losses the club have made. This all remains to be seen over the next few years.
Points deduction and ban from Europe I’d imagine.
Looks like the top 4 race got a lot easier. Might explain Pep mentally checking out all of a sudden
What does VAR say? Have we seen the lines yet?
Fraudulent financial and accounting practices and corruption are not the same thing. It stinks, and I hope they get as harsh a punishment as possible, but all I'm saying is that stripping of titles is beyond anything we'll likely see here because you can't equate this to match-fixing or anything like that.It is corruption. And blatant cheating.
I do fully expect that in the end the punishment will massively underwhelm and not fit the crimes. It’s just football is now, certainly in this country.
We won't see them stripped of any titles I would think. That would be reserved for match-fixing and blatant cheating.
But which players helped them win? Which players did they buy with earned money and which ones with doped dosh, and which ones had the most impact on the pitch? It would be near impossible to prove unfortunately.You don’t class this as blatant cheating? The scope of the unfair advantages they’ve gained and the opportunities missed by other clubs is damn near unprecedented
Nope, the Juve case is a bad comparison. The charges against City are far more serious. This is more than a few accounting tricks over a few years. It's a deep corruption across many financial areas and attempted cover up. It makes Juve look like choir boys. I haven't seen a legal expert yet who thinks City are going to escape relegation over this if the charges stick.
That doesn't make sense given it's the PL that are making the chargesI fully expect nothing to come off of this because more money in the PL is a good thing for the league / english system as a whole. EPL will be the new super league. TV rights money will increase and flow through the pyramid. That'll cement the PL's position as the best in the world - 3 of the top four sides in the world are english at the moment per UEFA.
It's not fair, but when has fairness ever mattered? And to be honest, the pre-oil system where the big players always remain big isn't exactly fair either.
To be fair Redbull Racing didn't cook the books. They went over budget but not fraudulently. I think their punishment was fair.