Sandikan
aka sex on the beach
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 54,900
Assuming they'll get at least a 1 point deduction, would they have any reason to apply it next season rather than this?
Pending appeal.Assuming they'll get at least a 1 point deduction, would they have any reason to apply it next season rather than this?
Wouldn't surprise me. But when does the statute start from?So reading the articles, even though the pl has no statute of limitations. The fraud and civil law of England has 6 years which is as of next month will be 6 years from when the Der Spiegel article first came out. It looks like everything they've been doing was delaying to get to this date.
Therefore to me it also looks like they'll get away with the majority of it again, with their fans and the club claiming exoneration again.
I hope someone on here will correct me and show me where this is incorrect.
So reading the articles, even though the pl has no statute of limitations. The fraud and civil law of England has 6 years which is as of next month will be 6 years from when the Der Spiegel article first came out. It looks like everything they've been doing was delaying to get to this date.
Therefore to me it also looks like they'll get away with the majority of it again, with their fans and the club claiming exoneration again.
I hope someone on here will correct me and show me where this is incorrect.
So reading the articles, even though the pl has no statute of limitations. The fraud and civil law of England has 6 years which is as of next month will be 6 years from when the Der Spiegel article first came out. It looks like everything they've been doing was delaying to get to this date.
Therefore to me it also looks like they'll get away with the majority of it again, with their fans and the club claiming exoneration again.
I hope someone on here will correct me and show me where this is incorrect.
Well… but the Der Spiegel article isn’t when the offenses occurred. 6 years since the article. Which means most likely at least 7 or 8 years since the offenses. I don’t remember the article verbatim, but I thought it dealt with mostly with stuff from around 2014 and earlier.Proceedings have already started, so surely a statute of limitations wouldn't apply.
Doesn't concealment amend the timings?Well… but the Der Spiegel article isn’t when the offenses occurred. 6 years since the article. Which means most likely at least 7 or 8 years since the offenses. I don’t remember the article verbatim, but I thought it dealt with mostly with stuff from around 2014 and earlier.
If the 6 year statute of limitations thing on stuff like fraud is true … that cuts out a huge part of what I felt like they could pin them on.