croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 38,744
And that alone is reason enough for the titles to not be awarded to 2nd place teams.
Yeah just want the Armstrong method
And that alone is reason enough for the titles to not be awarded to 2nd place teams.
Wasn't the armstrong method to give it to 15th placed guy after everyone else was disqualified?Yeah just want the Armstrong method
Not getting sucked into this until a real punishment has been decided. I also think point deduction won't really be enough, they'll be back a year later and get back to their old shenanigans.
Like it tainted Juventus?Depends on where they end up really, bottom of the pyramid and it's the end of Man City, If they drop down to the Championship they will have a core of player willing to hang around for a year and come back up.
Wonder if a load of their players have some sort of exit clause if they're relegated though as would probably hurt them more.
But going forward the club and everything it has achieved will be tainted, you can't just brush this off and move on.
Like it tainted Juventus?
I still think a deal will be agreed behind the scenes. One which looks like the PL have acted strongly but that Abu Dhabi are happy with.
Something like a £500m fine - which whilst a lot of money - isn't that considerable to AD in the grand scheme of things. The PL looks strong and City get away relatively scot free. The may even throw in a points deduction of 6-20 points which will be reduced on appeal.
There's just no way I can see them being relegated or stripped of the titles. The UK government won't want to upset their UAE counterparts - it was admitted that the City hearing has been discussed at government level and the FOI request wasn't disclosed because it contained 'sensitive information' so who knows what is happening behind the scenes.
This feels the most realistic outcome. Expecting the PL to stand up against the political manoeuvrings clearly going on seems naive to me.
Have to admit my level of interest in football lives and dies with this hearing.
I personally don't think the UK government would protect them. I'm Irish and not going to pretend I understand the politics in England. Personally, I would imagine they would want to be seen to have a fair penalty and it would be an 'easy' thing to please the public with. They jumped on the Super League proposal, didn't they bring it up in the house of commons?I still think a deal will be agreed behind the scenes. One which looks like the PL have acted strongly but that Abu Dhabi are happy with.
Something like a £500m fine - which whilst a lot of money - isn't that considerable to AD in the grand scheme of things. The PL looks strong and City get away relatively scot free. The may even throw in a points deduction of 6-20 points which will be reduced on appeal.
There's just no way I can see them being relegated or stripped of the titles. The UK government won't want to upset their UAE counterparts - it was admitted that the City hearing has been discussed at government level and the FOI request wasn't disclosed because it contained 'sensitive information' so who knows what is happening behind the scenes.
To be fair though, is there any point discussing it in depth? Any discussion has the caveat of ‘if they’re found guilty’, so it’s basically a hypothetical conversation.Never in depth
Wouldn't be surprised if this is ballpark where we end up.I still think a deal will be agreed behind the scenes. One which looks like the PL have acted strongly but that Abu Dhabi are happy with.
Something like a £500m fine - which whilst a lot of money - isn't that considerable to AD in the grand scheme of things. The PL looks strong and City get away relatively scot free. The may even throw in a points deduction of 6-20 points which will be reduced on appeal.
There's just no way I can see them being relegated or stripped of the titles. The UK government won't want to upset their UAE counterparts - it was admitted that the City hearing has been discussed at government level and the FOI request wasn't disclosed because it contained 'sensitive information' so who knows what is happening behind the scenes.
I heard on the radio the other day that it probably wouldn’t be until spring until a decision is made. To me the sensible outcome for a points deduction would be at the start of the following season. I’m also unsure whether City would be able to lodge an appeal.I'm wondering how and when the hoped-for points deduction will be announced and implemented. Think about it: if they announce a withering punishment - say enough of a point deduction that guarantees they are dumped into League One - before the end of the year, then every match they play after the announcement they will know is meaningless. How does that affect the clubs they played before the announcement? Their second half of the season will be a dead rubber.
Then there's the monetary compensation to all the clubs they cheated out of being able to play CL and EL football. Monetary compensation for clubs relegated and so on. That's more of a disgorgement, taking away what they had no right to have. Then after that, comes the fines. Since they basically print their own money, any sort of fine is going to be a slap on the wrist, and real punishment will have to be in the form of voiding achievements. Maybe a season where they play every home match behind closed doors too.
The FA is at a crossroads here.
I think you're right. Announced in the summer, right before the City open top bus parade.I heard on the radio the other day that it probably wouldn’t be until spring until a decision is made. To me the sensible outcome for a points deduction would be at the start of the following season. I’m also unsure whether City would be able to lodge an appeal.
It's certainly going to lose a lot of its luster.Well game over for this league then
I still think a deal will be agreed behind the scenes. One which looks like the PL have acted strongly but that Abu Dhabi are happy with.
Something like a £500m fine - which whilst a lot of money - isn't that considerable to AD in the grand scheme of things. The PL looks strong and City get away relatively scot free. The may even throw in a points deduction of 6-20 points which will be reduced on appeal.
There's just no way I can see them being relegated or stripped of the titles. The UK government won't want to upset their UAE counterparts - it was admitted that the City hearing has been discussed at government level and the FOI request wasn't disclosed because it contained 'sensitive information' so who knows what is happening behind the scenes.
It's certainly going to lose a lot of its luster.
Probably will end up with people devoting more time to their local clubs and/or finding a new club in a new league altogether.
I have a few friends that have already defected to Stockport for this very reason. It’s a sad state of affairs.It's certainly going to lose a lot of its luster.
Probably will end up with people devoting more time to their local clubs and/or finding a new club in a new league altogether.
I have a few friends that have already defected to Stockport for this very reason. It’s a sad state of affairs.
Up the fecking Hatters!I have a few friends that have already defected to Stockport for this very reason. It’s a sad state of affairs.
Honestly, if the scum manage to win their case, the other 19 premier league teams should decide not to play against them. It’s disgusting how they’ve been allowed to get away with what is objectively cheating, and they should be forcibly liquidated at the very least.
Yeah just want the Armstrong method
Generating FM signals or producing Titanium?
But yeah I couldn't stomach Starfish even 10 years after the fact 'winning' the league. It's one of the great joys in life to know that Twat never won one.
Who the feck is Starfish?Generating FM signals or producing Titanium?
But yeah I couldn't stomach Starfish even 10 years after the fact 'winning' the league. It's one of the great joys in life to know that Twat never won one.
I suspect if there is significant punishment Abu Dhabi will withdraw it's investments from the UK completely, to teach us a lesson. I don't know much about their investments but I suppose it would result in job losses and reduced taxes one way or another but so be it, can't be blackmailed.
Yes of course. Discussing the facts, the potential outcomes, doing in depth analysis of the leaks, etc. is what serious journalists that would want to present an unbiased view of the situation would do.To be fair though, is there any point discussing it in depth?
They are a large importer, but other countries would fall over each other to take our place and sell them instead, they wouldn't suffer any shortage of arms. The switch would be their punishment to the UK.They’re a massive importer of weapons from the UK, they don’t invest in us for charity - and war is bigger business than football, so I doubt it would have much impact.
Slippy G.Who the feck is Starfish?
Ah. I didn’t get that reference whatsoeverWho else?
Thing is, I don’t think even the serious journalists know the answers to those questions, and even speculating could jeopardise who knows what - it is an ongoing case after all.Yes of course. Discussing the facts, the potential outcomes, doing in depth analysis of the leaks, etc. is what serious journalists that would want to present an unbiased view of the situation would do.
SkySports have no intention of doing that.
There's always rugby or *starts to vomit* feck I don't even want to think of a life without football.Have to admit my level of interest in football lives and dies with this hearing.
There's always rugby or *starts to vomit* feck I don't even want to think of a life without football.
I blame them for everything anyway. It's their fault I'm bald.Well you have City to blame for all of this
Yeah.Their guilt is an inevitability at this stage. City have invested huge resources into delay tactics rather than fighting the claims. The timeline was posted earlier in this thread but essentially the hearing could have been completed over 3 years ago.
Kicking the can down the road isn't the action of an entity believing they can defend their actions. Let's not forget this is a civil matter too. The EPL need to prove City probably broke their rules. They have to prove it is more likely, than not, the allegations occured.
Once proven, I suspect City are in for a decade of legal issues. There are the criminal issues. False accounting (Section 17 Theft Act 1968) seems nailed on for the high level executives. Concealing criminal property (Section 327 POCA 2000) which is effectively money laundering. Then you have the fact this is effectively a complex fraud (resists making a Fraudiola reference). City have repeatedly made false representations from which they gained, and others were exposed to a risk of loss (Section 2 Fraud Act 2006). The most appropriate primacy for the investigation is likely the National Crime Agency (NCA) and Serious Fraud Office (SFO). That'll take a few years to unpick I suspect, a few convictions coming out of that. Custody threshold definitely passed when considering the societal importance of sport and the reputational damage to one of our biggest global exports.
Then all the civil stuff will begin. Every time City have finished ahead of another team, they've cost each team ~£1m in finishing position prize money. Years they've won, that's £19m. Second, £18m, etc. 15 years of it going to be around £200m. Then you have teams being relegated because City were cheating to stay in the league. Then the teams losing out on Champions League, Europa League and Conference League football because of a cheating team finishing ahead. The sponsorship implications of those losses. City have probably cost other teams around £750-1bn in lost revenues, just on those factors alone.
In short, I'd expect a couple of decent prison sentences for the coordinators of the conspiracy to defraud and financial ruin for City but likely playing out until 2035.
That's just blatantly untrue because other outlets have reported on this.Thing is, I don’t think even the serious journalists know the answers to those questions, and even speculating could jeopardise who knows what - it is an ongoing case after all.
Man's brought it back.Who the feck is Starfish?