MegadrivePerson
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
- Messages
- 1,694
Neh Kier Starmer for all his faults is genuinely a massive football fan.
Fair enough.
Still won't make him any more likely to ruin this countries relationship with Abu Dhabi though.
Neh Kier Starmer for all his faults is genuinely a massive football fan.
Nah it isn’t. It’s great advice if you wanna get something done and dusted and get your property back. If you are innocent in the case he explained. If you hand over your phone with PIN code the investigation is over far quicker and you get your phone back. There’s plenty legislation to use to seize your phone and there’s even a separate offence for refusing to provide PIN codes to enter said phone. Solicitors would actually advise cooperating so long as course if said suspect was innocent.
Beyond City, there is a larger question of who we let buy our businesses. Especially, some of our iconic ones around the country like long standing football clubs.
No Abramovich, No Usmanov, No Dubai, No Saudi state. At least do some basic diligence and apply common sense. No obvious crooks, no states.
I thought for a second that, maybe things are different in the UK... turns out they are not.
And your last statement is basically you agreeing with me. If your solicitor advises you to cooperate, you can do so knowing that it is in your best interest. As a layman, you don't know what you're up against.
I thought for a second that, maybe things are different in the UK... turns out they are not.
And your last statement is basically you agreeing with me. If your solicitor advises you to cooperate, you can do so knowing that it is in your best interest. As a layman, you don't know what you're up against.
As has been said multiple times, they admitted guilt, City haven'tWhat I’d like to know is why Everton and forest keep getting punished but not a single word about city
Ah yes, so you agree that if cooperating is not in your best interest, ie. there's illegal/dodgy things you might not want them to find out about (whether related to the accusation or not), then don't cooperate.... As City have done.I thought for a second that, maybe things are different in the UK... turns out they are not.
And your last statement is basically you agreeing with me. If your solicitor advises you to cooperate, you can do so knowing that it is in your best interest. As a layman, you don't know what you're up against.
The more you think about it, the more bizarre and embarrassing for English football this is.
115 charges and still allowed to function and continue in the meantime as if nothing has happened.
A criminal in such circumstances would have bail conditions and some kind of restrictions whilst this went to court. It really is a disgrace.
Give in to the dark side...It’s so hard rooting for City in this match. I’m almost rooting for united for the first time in my life.
They win an ETH keeps his job citing progress what could be going forward. But I just want City to get punched in the nose in a final. Knocked out of the Cl when favored and knocked out of the FA Cup by inferior city neighbors would have to hurt.Give in to the dark side...
I don’t usually like Craig Burley at Espn as he mostly behaves like a Liverpool and City loving twat. But he tore into City a week or two back which was wonderful to see - more pundits need to grow a pair and call City’s bullshit out.And here's ESPN's Luis Miguel Echegaray this morning praising City with only a briefest mention of the charges. It's comical how the media just fall in line.
Time for a £500m spend, by hook or by crook.
New bogus sponsorship announcement imminent.
He probably won’t keep his job. It’ll be a lot like Van Gaal.They win an ETH keeps his job citing progress what could be going forward. But I just want City to get punched in the nose in a final. Knocked out of the Cl when favored and knocked out of the FA Cup by inferior city neighbors would have to hurt.
Hope so. Cheating bastaaaadsWasn’t sure where to put this and didn’t think it needed it’s own thread but overnight, went from 2000/1 down to 10/1 to get relegated. They are currently 25/1 to get relegated
Something is stirring
Wasn’t sure where to put this and didn’t think it needed it’s own thread but overnight, went from 2000/1 down to 10/1 to get relegated. They are currently 25/1 to get relegated
Something is stirring
Doesn't mean anything on it's own.
Not many people are putting any reasonable amount of money on this outcome, so all it takes is for 1 person to make a "feck it" bet and lob 1k on it happening, it shifts the odds completely.
Probably bookies covering their arse.
People might be tempted to chuck 10,20 quid on at 2000/1 due to the charges.
Haha, saw that coming. 115 charges…
From 2000/1 to 25/1???
I am no expert but I seriously doubt that one person lumping on city to get relegated at 2000/1 makes that much difference
From 2000/1 to 25/1???
I am no expert but I seriously doubt that one person lumping on city to get relegated at 2000/1 makes that much difference
If one bet superceeds all the volumetric liquidity on a pool for the preceeding months, yes, 2000/1 > 25/1 is easily achievable.
Let me give you a bit of context.
Remember when Leicester won the league? The odds were 5000/1. Do you know how many people placed a bet? 1 person. £50. The next day, this 1 person betting reduced the odds to 2000/1.
1 other person making a bet of £1000 would have reduced to odds to 100/1.
2 bets totally £1050 can reduce odds from 5000/1 to 100/1, yes.