AaronRedDevil
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2018
- Messages
- 10,029
He's easily worth 100m. I love when people severely under value our playersI would take 60m plus in a heartbeat. We need to move on from the majority of this team.
He's easily worth 100m. I love when people severely under value our playersI would take 60m plus in a heartbeat. We need to move on from the majority of this team.
I wouldn't want us to be paying £100m for a player who turns 30 in September.He's easily worth 100m.
He's got an engine. Bruno is not your normal player, he doesn't get injured or miss a single game. Creates all your chances and he's insanely pivotal to any attack. The man is worth every cent. 70-80m at minimum.I wouldn't want us to be paying £100m for a player who turns 30 in September.
He's got an engine. Bruno is not your normal player, he doesn't get injured or miss a single game. Creates all your chances and he's insanely pivotal to any attack.
He's easily worth 100m. I love when people severely under value our players
I think you'd have dozens of offers for 60m. I wouldn't want to stand in his way if he wants to move on but i'd still want a stupid fee to let him go. I might reluctantly let him leave for 90m after a lot of haggling and him being really intent on moving on but I'd consider it a bad deal if we get less than 100m60m+ minimum I think.
Clearly you love Bruno so you're letting a bit of bias seep in.
In general, no clubs will not pay 100m for players that are in their 30's. And that has nothing to do with how good you think he is, we are talking about what price he'd actually fetch on the market.
I'm thinking in € personallyUm, I think it’s you getting the valuation wrong. Not a chance in hell you’d get £100m for someone of his age.
I think you'd have dozens of offers for 60m. I wouldn't want to stand in his way if he wants to move on but i'd still want a stupid fee to let him go. I might reluctantly let him leave for 90m after a lot of haggling and him being really intent on moving on but I'd consider it a bad deal if we get less than 100m
Wow you really seem to be struggling to cope with the news that Odegaard is a better player than Bruno. Surprising.
If you swapped Odegaard with Bruno they'd probably be further away from the title than they are currently. By how much, who knows.
I think you'd have dozens of offers for 60m. I wouldn't want to stand in his way if he wants to move on but i'd still want a stupid fee to let him go. I might reluctantly let him leave for 90m after a lot of haggling and him being really intent on moving on but I'd consider it a bad deal if we get less than 100m
Or Kane with one year left on his contract. Or higuain to juventus.Exactly. The only exception to that statement is Ronaldo, who I think is in a category of his own.
I'm thinking in € personally
Unluckily for you, that ain’t gonna happenI'm excited about moving on him from and the chaos ball he encourages.
I agree i wouldn't want us to spend 100m on him. But im not sure selling your best players for huge fee's is always a foolproof, great plan either. The only reason i'd consider it is because he could fetch a stupid, overpriced offer (ie 100m+).Just saw your other post but I mean 60m pounds for what it's worth.
I don't think selling any 30 year old for close to 100m is a bad deal. History has shown it pretty much never is in fact, no matter how much it might suck to see them leave. And that's often with teams that are far more successful, we are looking at a full rebuild right now and an extra 90m would go a long way towards doing so instead of hanging on to a great player that's going to elevate the squad to MAYBE top 4 if everything goes perfectly?
I'm excited about moving on him from and the chaos ball he encourages.
</thread>
Very similar stats to De Bruyne who plays in the most possession heavy side in the world.I think Bruno leaving is massively viable if a manager who values possession comes in. Great contributor to the team but at the expense of the team being consistent in the build up. I think Bruno out and Neves in to pair with Mainoo and a younger defensive midfielder, physically imposing behind them is a recipe for success.
It's not that Bruno is a bad player but depending on how the team will play next season it could be a benefit.
That's all well and good, but is he still going to have that engine in 5 years time? £70-80m at the maximum.He's got an engine. Bruno is not your normal player, he doesn't get injured or miss a single game. Creates all your chances and he's insanely pivotal to any attack. The man is worth every cent. 70-80m at minimum.
It is Bruno who wants to leave, not the other way around. He will stay only if his ambition is met. He is tired of the non-stop rebuild process.
I agree i wouldn't want us to spend 100m on him. But im not sure selling your best players for huge fee's is always a foolproof, great plan either. The only reason i'd consider it is because he could fetch a stupid, overpriced offer (ie 100m+).
I can see Rashford probably wants to leave as well regardless the fans opinion on him. He is basically on the same boat with Bruno.We have been in 'transition' for 11 years. It's f'n ridiculous. If I was Bruno and I heard that Bayern were in for me I'd walk to Germany. We are not on their level, or anything close to their level.
Manchester United met Bruno Fernandes last week to discuss his future, with the club making clear they want him to stay and the midfielder expressing a desire to remain at Old Trafford, according to The Athletic.It is Bruno who wants to leave, not the other way around.
Nevertheless, both players current highest placement in the league is 2nd. Odegaard being better than Fernandes or not isn’t why Arsenal are currently better. Bruno is probably our only top player at the moment in my opinion, Arsenal would be better if they had him in their squad 100%.Yeah but there's no doubt they are a side worthy of being title challengers. In no small part because of Odegaard.
And if they weren't up against a financial doping monstrosity coached by the best manager in the world, they'd walk the league now and probably for the next couple of seasons.
What we should move away from. Even Rashford has been dragged to this group. Rashy used to score against City, Arsenal, Liverpool in high frequency but now he's a shadow of his former self.I understand this point. But the problem is the replacements are 1-2 good games per season.
The way he plays, and the fact that he's captain, I'd say he'd be detrimental to any rebuild. I'd sell him for the right priceEven if you bring in Arteta Mkii or Emery it will take 3 to 4 years to rebuild. Does Bruno want to give his last 4 years at his top level in another rebuild?
What is the right price? He has high wages, has no resale value, no marketing power like Messi or CR7, and he only has 3 to 4 years left in him.The way he plays, and the fact that he's captain, I'd say he'd be detrimental to any rebuild. I'd sell him for the right price
Manchester United met Bruno Fernandes last week to discuss his future, with the club making clear they want him to stay and the midfielder expressing a desire to remain at Old Trafford, according to The Athletic.
I'd sign off on 40-50m.What is the right price? He has high wages, has no resale value, no marketing power like Messi or CR7, and he only has 3 to 4 years left in him.
He's close to being fully amortised (if not done already) so I think 50+ would be considered.I'd sign off on 40-50m.
I can see Rashford probably wants to leave as well regardless the fans opinion on him. He is basically on the same boat with Bruno.
Yet doesn’t encourage it for his national team.
Probably the most underrated player I can remember in all my time watching this club, and by some distance. Unbelievable looking at this thread how many can’t wait to see the back of our best player due to some nonsensical idea that he can’t play possession