I am not a scout so me not knowing somebody "who is contributing as much" still doesn't help your argument. I just tried to explain, that blunt categories like "good" and "bad" don't really work at the highest Level. We've seen Sancho for Dortmund, actually a lot of players flourished for Dortmund yet fell short heftily once taken out of that environment. The question should be what roles are required in the team and who is best suited to fullfill that role.Go on then, use your "these-days-methods"(wtf?) and give me a player who contributes as much as Bruno does. It is fecking mental to point at him and say it's his fault we are where we are or that we will be a better team without him. Bruno needs some good players around him for once instead of having to do it all on his own.
Well there aren't many teams out there who don't follow such principles. Certainly the more successful ones do. We on the other hand are tragically underorganized on the pitch and it effects our results more and more. You are right, the very best players will thrive in many different Systems and roles but the majority of the (only) good players will only really flourish in specific environments. On top of that, no hyperbole needed, I've never seen any claims that could be described as anywhere close to "mathletes". Nobody asks to go Ajax or Tiki Taka, nobody wants to go full force rigid and systematic, but we have to move out of the red zone at least so the lack of control is no longer contributing to our issues on the pitch.I don't believe in this "system above all" nonsense.
I firmly believe that a good player can and will thrive in any system. Of course players will have preferences. Of course there will be systems that are slightly better suited for them. But a good player will always be good if he plays for a good team that doesn't hold him back. In the few instances where it doesn't work out it's most likely an attitude problem or off-pitch issues (Zlatan in Barcelona being the first example I can think of).
Pep and Klopp have different styles, but I can guarantee that they would both do great even if you "scrambled" their teams by giving Klopp half the City players and vice versa. And the same is true for Ancelotti and Flick now.
Not sure why you'd describe it as Obsession. Even if Bruno is as good as you see him apparently, it would still be extremely problematic for the team to be so over-reliant on one player. It is clear that without him we lose out on abilities that good teams have to have. And while there maybe never has been a time where somebody said "lets build around Bruno" it is what happened. Under Ole the team certainly was set up to maximize his capabilities from a certain point onwards. Under ETH, his and Rashfords connection was seen as the primary attacking route in season one. He is the captain, he is playing every minute, the team materialized to this state around him. Not his fault, not his flaw. To me personally, he is a symbol of the way we play the game. And given that performances and (since this season mostly) also results are suffering, the way we play can and should be questioned.What the feck does “building a team around him” even mean?! He’s a good player, who can play a couple of different positions and will look a lot better when we add more good players to the squad. Up until the point he is no longer good. But we haven’t reached that point yet. It’s really that simple. I will never understand this newfound obsession that online football fans have of making a very simple sport stupidly complicated.
Great way to discuss. Always a good idea to open the door to politics to keep the ad hominems fresh. It surely was warranted given all the personal attacks your gentle soul had to suffer. How long will it take until you label it right-wing to criticise a player?It's a the same logical fallacy often seen with conspiracy theorists.
"Ok, but what if this obviously good player actually is a problem? And only I and a handful of other individuals are the first to notice? Holy shit, we're smart for noticing this. Wake up, sheeple!"
Nah, that has to be the Liverpool game. Great Opponent, great Performance - yesterday he was good but the majority of the match was us defending with 10 men behind the ball, no environment to really shine.Ran himself into the ground for us tonight. Hard not to be proud of that effort. Showed some quality too - maybe his best performance for us this season
I am not a scout so me not knowing somebody "who is contributing as much" still doesn't help your argument. I just tried to explain, that blunt categories like "good" and "bad" don't really work at the highest Level. We've seen Sancho for Dortmund, actually a lot of players flourished for Dortmund yet fell short heftily once taken out of that environment. The question should be what roles are required in the team and who is best suited to fullfill that role.
And for the record - yes, Bruno is more or less connected with everything good we do these days. But you can't buy shit with that, given that we don't seem to go anywhere as a team. And just for the record, try to calm yourself down, I have never said that "all is his fault" or "we'll be better without him". It doesn't really help any discussion if you just project your views on others.
Well there aren't many teams out there who don't follow such principles. Certainly the more successful ones do. We on the other hand are tragically underorganized on the pitch and it effects our results more and more. You are right, the very best players will thrive in many different Systems and roles but the majority of the (only) good players will only really flourish in specific environments. On top of that, no hyperbole needed, I've never seen any claims that could be described as anywhere close to "mathletes". Nobody asks to go Ajax or Tiki Taka, nobody wants to go full force rigid and systematic, but we have to move out of the red zone at least so the lack of control is no longer contributing to our issues on the pitch.
People can doubt the relevance of systems, each to their own after all, but one thing can't get discussed away - the best teams out there usually not only have such systems but also very good individual Players. So it isn't either or - at the top, it is both. And given that these days we don't even have too many good individual Players, we might as well give it a shot with the systems, not like we could much worse.
I think this would only be reasonable, no reason to shit on such a simple concept only because I used it in connection to slight Bruno criticism. Especially given that specifically you think that he will shine in any system anyways.
Not sure why you'd describe it as Obsession. Even if Bruno is as good as you see him apparently, it would still be extremely problematic for the team to be so over-reliant on one player. It is clear that without him we lose out on abilities that good teams have to have. And while there maybe never has been a time where somebody said "lets build around Bruno" it is what happened. Under Ole the team certainly was set up to maximize his capabilities from a certain point onwards. Under ETH, his and Rashfords connection was seen as the primary attacking route in season one. He is the captain, he is playing every minute, the team materialized to this state around him. Not his fault, not his flaw. To me personally, he is a symbol of the way we play the game. And given that performances and (since this season mostly) also results are suffering, the way we play can and should be questioned.
Great way to discuss. Always a good idea to open the door to politics to keep the ad hominems fresh. It surely was warranted given all the personal attacks your gentle soul had to suffer. How long will it take until you label it right-wing to criticise a player?
Nah, that has to be the Liverpool game. Great Opponent, great Performance - yesterday he was good but the majority of the match was us defending with 10 men behind the ball, no environment to really shine.
You'll bring it far on here, newbie. Always a bad sign when different opinions on a football forum trigger you personally
It seems as if he is better playing deeper, where he can see the whole game rather that in the 10.
Yeah, he is pretty much alone with that extra bit of quality in our side. Amad is a big miss for us. He also has that little bit extra. Eriksen has it too and i think we need to use him more often. One of the 10s should suit him fine i think.I think it's really simple (in our case); the more involved Bruno is, the better. In CM he will get minimum 80 touches (sometimes more than 100) whenever we play mid table or lower table opponents. We also see that even when he plays AM he tends to drop deep because the team struggles to advance the ball effectively, so he must help out.
This is especially important now that Amad is injured. We don't have much quality on the ball and the only other creative player is Eriksen, who don't seem to have the legs to play game after game.
Had a good game. Difficult game to shine as attacking player but he certainly earned todays wages tonight. Good deliveries into the box, you'd wonder why we don't see that more often. Its as if playing with a little more conviction is a good thing.
Yeah, he is pretty much alone with that extra bit of quality in our side. Amad is a big miss for us. He also has that little bit extra. Eriksen has it too and i think we need to use him more often. One of the 10s should suit him fine i think.
Was soothing to watch them have fun with the Ipswich defense at the end there.
I guess, if some of our online fanbase has its way, we'll find out the answer to Critchley's question next season after we sell Bruno.
Had a good game. Difficult game to shine as attacking player but he certainly earned todays wages tonight. Good deliveries into the box, you'd wonder why we don't see that more often. Its as if playing with a little more conviction is a good thing.
The story of this thread - someone seemingly uses the wrong amount of praise and becomes the antagonist.Why don't you just try and give him an unadulterated compliment. It's possible. See how it feels. Could be a breakthrough moment for you.
Rather than "he was good but...."
Cmon, a good captain would scream until Dalot turned into prime Giggs and Ugarte into prime Scholes…Roy comes across really poorly in that clip. Bullshit arguments all around.
"Pretending to close people down"Yeah, that right there tells you everything you need to know about his bias. Not to mention the "they're 15th in the league" nonsense.
Keane was a world class captain, but not even he would have been able to drag this team to the top all by himself
I guess, if some of our online fanbase has its way, we'll find out the answer to Critchley's question next season after we sell Bruno.
Two things can be correct though. Bruno has been frustrating at times with his long balls and petulance, he also goes missing in games. At the same time though, he has been pivotal in some games, winning us points and god knows where we would be without him.Keane was a great player and a great captain but it's one thing to be captaining sides with the likes of Beckham and Giggs and Scholes and RVN and Stam and Rio and Rooney and Ronaldo in them, with the greatest manager of all time in the dugout.
And it's another thing to be captaining sides with the likes of Dalot and Hojlund and Onana and a dickhead like Sancho and a Rashford who can't be arsed to run, with really struggling managers like ETH and Amorim in the dugout.
The criticism Bruno gets on here is mental, we'd be completely fecked without him.
Whatever you think of him, one thing you certainly can't accuse him of is going missing. Whether he's playing brilliantly or poorly he always puts himself about and is never afraid to get on the ball.Two things can be correct though. Bruno has been frustrating at times with his long balls and petulance, he also goes missing in games. At the same time though, he has been pivotal in some games, winning us points and god knows where we would be without him.
Roy asked in the video who do you start with? I wouldn't start at Bruno but by no means is he above criticism. I'm looking probably at the senior players, the likes of Casemiro, Rashford, Onana, Maguire etc. Bruno is near the bottom in priority.
Not true. Someone else would be there in his place. Either way, has he seen the bottom three sides? We couldn't finish below them if we wanted to.
Who? Our transfers have been appalling.
Not true. Someone else would be there in his place. Either way, has he seen the bottom three sides? We couldn't finish below them if we wanted to.
Honestly think Keane would ask for a transfer out of the club.Roy comes across really poorly in that clip. Bullshit arguments all around.
"Pretending to close people down"Yeah, that right there tells you everything you need to know about his bias. Not to mention the "they're 15th in the league" nonsense.
Keane was a world class captain, but not even he would have been able to drag this team to the top all by himself
Who? Our transfers have been appalling.
Literally anyone. That's how certain I am that we wouldn't be in the bottom three, regardless of if Bruno was here or not.What?
Someone who is never injured and has the output Bruno has? Who would that be then?
Apparently not having an answer to that question does not invalidate the argument that we could get someone better than Bruno.What?
Someone who is never injured and has the output Bruno has? Who would that be then?
This. He's really tiring to listen toMore often than not Keane talks out of his backside.
It's almost like he's human?Two things can be correct though. Bruno has been frustrating at times with his long balls and petulance, he also goes missing in games. At the same time though, he has been pivotal in some games, winning us points and god knows where we would be without him.
Roy asked in the video who do you start with? I wouldn't start at Bruno but by no means is he above criticism. I'm looking probably at the senior players, the likes of Casemiro, Rashford, Onana, Maguire etc. Bruno is near the bottom in priority.
It's almost like he's human?
Him questioning someone else's commitment and work ethic is ironic considering he turned his back on his own fecking country.This. He's really tiring to listen to