What annoys me more than anything about this Bruno slander since the weekend is the manager has to take most of the blame for playing him on the left wing.
It might not excuse his whining and playacting but the manager set us up to fail at the weekend. Anfield is no place to start experimenting. And I love this manager but he needs to have a good long hard look at himself too for those ridiculous tactics. Weghorst at 10 and Bruno on left didn't work at all. It was absolutely to the detriment of our team and also allowed Trent a free ride too.
Let's not make this about Bruno. The whole team was crap and so was the manager. The worst result in our entire history you could argue. Absolutely still fuming about it.
The manager doesn't have to apologize to anyone, especially to the players. The moment the previous manager decided that this is the way to go, he basically dug his own grave.
As far as the team as a whole is concerned, the biggest lesson to take from Sunday is that we still have a lot of work to do before we can claim with certainty that "we are back". Let this also be a lesson to all the fans who were pointing at the 2nd place(s) as a sign of progress. We will end this season with more silverware than Liverpool, we will probably finish above them on the PL table, too. And they will still be the better team, simply because their ceiling is still much higher than ours. Don't be angry for the things you can't change, like a freakish scoreline.
Going back to the game, was it really strange? Is the concept of the wide playmaker so alien to United fans, or do our fans actually believe that the only way you can operate on the wings is by having pace? Maybe every time the likes of Bernardo Silva, David Silva or Iniesta were/are utilized in the wide areas is a crime against the sport itself.
There was no experimentation, at least not one so wild to have people throwing their arms in the air. It's factual that Liverpool leave a lot of spaces open in the wide channels because they rely heavily on their FBs for creativity. Bruno is a player who needs space and time on the ball to work his magic. So, ETH set his starting position in the area on the pitch where he would find space. If he had to track back and find himself in a deeper position, Rashford would occupy that space and we would search a ball to him for the counter. Again, he put the best creator in the area where he would find the most space to exploit.
Why Weghorst centrally? Because when you have Rashford stretching the defence vertically to create pockets of space between the lines, you need someone to receive the ball and protect it. If you can't do that, how on earth will your wide players get in-behind? How will the midfielders get higher up the pitch? How will Shaw (mainly) and Dalot/AWB get the chance to play on the overlap/underlap? You need time for these things, and keeping the ball is what offers you time. Bruno didn't start centrally because he would have Liverpool's midfield constantly breathing down his neck. That's not his game, he needs space.
Because something doesn't work (for various reasons) doesn't necessarily make the logic bad. It kinda worked for 45 minutes. If we had better and more posssession-safe players, it could have worked better, too. But it feels like the discussion with Mata. Why didn't any United manager start him centrally, and how he was wasted in the wide areas? The answer is simple: Because he couldn't keep the ball under pressure and when he received it with his back to goal, his first three or four touches were always backwards and sideways.
ETH has done a lot of good things in these 8 months and he has also made some bad calls. The one thing you can't accuse him of is that he doesn't do his absolute best to facilitate the players' strengths while implementing his principals.