That's where you are wrong. That's also the point the other thread has been trying to make. He simply needs to play in this chaotic way to get his high stats.
It doesn't mean that he's not intelligent or that he's just a street footballer. He wants to be the main provider and he can produce good numbers. But his game lacks a lot of things: Technique, ball retention and ball carrying skills and the ability to receive the ball on the half-turn. So, he often shifts out of position and roams into the spaces where he believes he can have the space and the time on the ball to pick out a pass while facing the goal. The likes of KdB or Odegaard may have similar passing completion stats, but they don't lack all of these things. This makes them capable to operate within the frame of a structured system. And a well structured system leads to well-drilled moves (and their variants) on the pitch. Which is the basis around which most good football sides have been built in the last 15 years or so.
I believe you can understand the paradox when you're arguing that the man who wants to be at the heart of our midfield needs better possession players around him. Possession football is all about controlling the chaotic nature of football. It's about taming the chaos, not embracing it. I am also not sure but, judging by experience, whenever people say that possession teams lack a cutting edge, they mean Pep's sides who like to pass the ball into oblivion. Well, in the previous 6 years they've been averaging 95 PL goals p/s, mostly by playing without a main striker, too. Structure and purposeful movement on the ball can provide you with a cutting edge. And, as opposed to relying on individualism, it's more dependable and lasting. It's also harder to achieve. In the end, the question isn't really about Bruno's numbers or his commitment to the cause. It's about whether we are going to continue being a side that lives and dies by how he chooses to play the game.