Of course Weghorst shouldn't have any place in the team.
But if Erik rated Bruno's contributions from a deeper role he wouldn't be shoe horning Weghorst into Bruno's "best" position. We have way more available wingers than we have central players of late, and yet Bruno is being shifted out wide most of the time.
If ETH thought Bruno's work rate was ever useful he simply wouldn't be playing Weghorst as a defensive number 10.
This.. in bold.
Why people can't wrap their heads around this is still a mystery.. and in this I will support Ten Hag 100% as through naked eye Bruno has been the weak-link in that midfield.
Bruno kind of reminds me of Rooney when he was washed up. In the sense that some people couldn’t bring themselves to criticise or have honest assessments of the guy, despite them being poor. A bunch of “whataboutisms”.
Also this.
So, all of a sudden with ETH arrival you expect us to dominate possession against Pep and Klopp who are there for 7-8 years, won titles, CL, played CL finals and have established teams for a couple of years? Do you actually believe ETH is a miracle man ?
We have already beaten good teams: City, Pool, Arsenal, Barcelona, at home.
Improving us will take time and ETH is on the right track, with or without Bruno we are going forward, you have to understand that there isn't a better player than him in his position currently.
You are right about Bruno not being able to play in a midfield 3, but maybe that's not the plan, if City won titles playing a midfield 3 it does not mean everybody needs to play that way.
1. I have not questioned Ten Hag anywhere at all. Never will I, because through his eyes I can see he see's what I see in Bruno. A player who can't play in Midfield where you have to controll games + dominate teams.
2. All City, Pool, Arsenal games we beaten them with counter attacking football. Zero control of the game. 30% possession in City/Pool 39% in Arsenal. Only Barca we have over 40%. We know Barca intensity is not EPL levels.
True to it, after going to Etihad, Anfield, Emirates we were blown away in those games. People forget but in Emirates Arsenal were camping in our box for 25 minutes, they had the most touches in box against any team ever.
This is because of having 2 midfielders.
3. If we have no other player better than him for his number as you say it , why is Ten Hag playing Wout there? Why is Ten Hag unsure of Bruno best position? Why?
I will believe Ten Hag more than you, sadly. He see's something that many people don't see it. That's why I'm trying to say in many words.
Again, I will say it, Bruno is the Maguire of our midfield.
We tried even back 3 with Maguire, ( tried wingbacks, having 2 defensive pivots ) as we are trying Bruno is right wing, left wing, next will be false 9 eventually it will come to pass he is a very big passenger in the modern game. He can't play in City/Arsenal/Liverpool team for sure
4. It's not city alone which plays with 3 flat midfielders.
Even the mighty Real where Casemiro won everything he had other 2 guys, look how Arsenal changed after implementing Odergaard, Xaka, Partey midfield.
All conquering City/Liverpool midfield were 3 flat midfielders.
Going forward I believe Ten Hag will deal with Bruno has he dealt with Maguire. A midfield signing during summer then phasing him out next season.
If Wout can take his position why not a 25 year old 'Odergaard' from some club.
Till then we shall have games like the last 2 weeks.
Barca - winning through sheer will.
Westham - on the ropes, then 2 goals after 90 minutes
Newcastle - winning through resolute defending + 39% possession.
Liverpool - on the ropes the thrashing.
I'm 100% convinced Ten Hag will deal with the Bruno conundrum by the summer, and I'm sure he will solve that problem for the betterment of Manchester United.