dubplate warrior
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2015
- Messages
- 1,398
What does this prove exactly?
That he's a shit captain and a petulant primadona.
What does this prove exactly?
I think you have to be careful what you wish for with Bruno Fernandes. He obviously isn't a player without flaws, but we've also massively lacked intensity when we've played without him in recent times. I agree with the sentiments about him being a chaotic player, but that works both ways. There have been plenty of occasions when we've struggled to create and Fernandes has made something happen.
The misstep we made with Fernandes was giving him that new contract before ten Hag even worked his first day on the job. You've effectively made him undroppable from that point forward and taken the decision out of the manager's hands. I don't necessarily think he would've been replaced anyway but it was such a bizarre thing to do. Fernandes' contract wasn't even close to coming up and it gave strength to his position when nobody else in the team was afforded that privilege.
The dark arts are fine when you're winning 1-0 at Anfield and want to time waste. Or when you're 0-0 and want to con the referee and gain a marginal edge.
Not when you're in the middle of a hammering. None of the histrionics are acceptable, just sets a spineless and defeatist standard for his team mates. Even worse is rolling around feigning injury as your team mates are getting counter attacked because you gave it away.
Are they all? Or maybe this is just an opportunity a few have been waiting for all season to make sure they are heard.Even more annoying than yesterday’s defeat are the Pogba fans who can’t wait to s*** on Bruno every time we lose or don’t play well.
What point are you trying to make about Bruno here? Just say it rather than beating about the bush. Do you just want him dropping or actually selling?
Who is this Pogba person you are referring to?Even more annoying than yesterday’s defeat are the Pogba fans who can’t wait to s*** on Bruno every time we lose or don’t play well.
I want him out of the captaincy equation, and I want enough competition in the squad so we dont start him in every game in 4 competitions next season. Especially the big away games where he is inevitably terrible.
Right now I'd say he's our best option on the right, if only because he can actually put a decent ball in the box. I'm pretty sure ETH has already decided he's not reliable enough in midfield. Are we playing Weghorst in number 10 because he's better for the role than Bruno, or because we have so little talent on the wings that Bruno is needed out there every game. Hard to say.
And naturally I also want him to stop acting like a petulant baby when things dont go his way.
In terms of wanting more competition and an improved squad I don’t think you’ll find anyone that disagrees with you? Even Ten Hag will want more quality options and the opportunity to not have to play him every single game.
The disagreement is whether Bruno is someone we build the future team around. Clearly the right route is not to. We cant build a team to mitigate all of Bruno's many weaknesses if we ever want to compete at the top again.
If we have an ideal summer window, Bruno will end up fighting it out with Antony to start on the right. Only because we've wasted too much on Antony to move on from him after 1 season.
I think what you're saying is right but it's one of those things that still ranks pretty low for where we're currently at. Wout Weghorst still currently starts every game for us, for example.I think dropping Fernandes depends on who it is that's replacing him. If United are in the market for a 10 then it should be one who cycles possession well in phases of play a little bit like Odegaard who doesn't have standout stats but is fundamental to the genuine performances of this Arsenal midfield. Maybe Wirtz pre injury but I still feel that in order for this team to better the performances Fernandes eventually is going to have to adapt his game or be dropped.
It's all good putting up with unforced errors in what is a weakened league this year (especially the top 8) but in the UCL beyond qualifying rounds the opposition will punish you for these sorts of lapses. For me Fernandes and Fred have a ceiling in terms of what they bring to the phases of play. United need to invest heavily in this area along with a striker in the summer. There's a perception creeping in that these current crop of players are apart of the transition but many of them need replacing.
Instead of Bruno Fernandes, there is a feeling at #mufc that Raphaël Varane, David de Gea or Casemiro would be better suited to the role as club captain [
@SamiMokbel81_DM
,
@ChrisWheelerDM
]
Sources close to #mufc have indicated there are reservations inside the United camp over whether Bruno Fernandes has the right attributes to take on the club's full-time captaincy role [
@SamiMokbel81_DM
,
@ChrisWheelerDM
]
Many at #mufc - players included - were irritated by Bruno Fernandes' behaviour on the pitch against Liverpool [
@SamiMokbel81_DM
,
@ChrisWheelerDM
]
I mean 7 months in and we are competing aren’t we? What’s to say that can’t continue with Bruno given so far we’ve been more than competitive so early in the rebuild?
There is an acknowledgement that a new #mufc captain should have little to do with popularity. However, there is a sense that others within the dressing room would be more suited to a role in terms of nurturing a collective team-spirit [
@SamiMokbel81_DM
,
@ChrisWheelerDM
]
I think what you're saying is right but it's one of those things that still ranks pretty low for where we're currently at. Wout Weghorst still currently starts every game for us, for example.
I think if we choose to move away from a midfield including Fernandes, we should be looking to shift the balance of how our current midfield operates anyway. I wouldn't be looking for another 10 but two numbers 8s - that's how most teams have had success in European competition in recent years. De Jong would be a good start.
Thanks for that. Hmm, I don't know about De Gea. He is too meek for me.Here we go
We're competing relative to last season. We're still miles off a convincing title tilt.
Anyway, I'm almost certain ETH has already ruled Bruno out as a central player in his plans. And we're seeing the evidence of that in every game now even with Eriksen injured, Fred knackered and Weghorst a championship striker.
Any of Varane, Martinez and Casemiro for me. I would choose Casemiro or Varane as they are organisers already and don't really lose their heads.It's funny actually. Hard to think of a squad over the years with so few convicning candidates for captaincy. At one point recently, I was thinking maybe Luke Shaw then yesterday happened.
McT would probably be perfect, if he wasn't so shit at football.
Lisandro Martinez probably the pick of a bad bunch but he seems a bit too maverick.
Agreed.I look at someone like Odegaard captaining arsenal. The martinelli goal that got pulled back at old trafford, odegaard's reaction was basically like " come on, you dont know what youre doing" but he puts it behind him, and went back to his job. There was no indication that he was going to let it affect his mentality. As soon as bruno gets annoyed and complaining about every decision, It means there's a high chance of us losing. Our recent upturn in form and results has meant we havent had to discuss his petulance in a while, but i'm not surprised at all the way he acted when things weren't going his way.
For all the talent he has, he is honestly my least favourite united player of all time. He tries to con referees, get other players booked, feigns injury and throws his toys out the pram. He's also what I class as a "cheating presser" in that he runs to close the ball down and it looks like he's busting a gut but really he's just getting out of position if we get countered on. You can take goals and assists away from a player and still have attributes that make people like them, but with bruno, once the output diminishes, theres nothing to enjoy. Not befitting of the badge, In my honest opinion.
It all started from Neville being a muppet in commentary suggesting he dived and it was nowhere near his face. Whatever is relayed in commentary is what tends to spill over into post match debates by fans online. It’s the same nonsense that’s being discussed today about Bruno wanting to supposedly be subbed off because of Neville’s incredible hawk eye sight which was way off.What’s mad is how many people need this footage to see the bleeding obvious. You could see that he got a belt in the mouth from the very first replay. Yet the pundits (and fans unable to think for themselves/use their eyes) got caught up in a fiction about the contact being on his chest.
Now nobody has any idea how much that actually hurt and he’s such a drama queen it’s easy to assume he wasn’t hurt at all. Whatever, he clearly got a smack from a flailing arm and should have been awarded a free. Instead we have our own fans doubling down on a false narrative, slagging off one of our players. Go figure.
You really think that counts as being smacked in the face?What’s mad is how many people need this footage to see the bleeding obvious. You could see that he got a belt in the mouth from the very first replay. Yet the pundits (and fans unable to think for themselves/use their eyes) got caught up in a fiction about the contact being on his chest.
Now nobody has any idea how much that actually hurt and he’s such a drama queen it’s easy to assume he wasn’t hurt at all. Whatever, he clearly got a smack from a flailing arm and should have been awarded a free. Instead we have our own fans doubling down on a false narrative, slagging off one of our players. Go figure.
You really think that counts as being smacked in the face?