andersj
Nick Powell Expert
Atletico Madrid have been successfull in a 442 the past few years.
Excellent response.
Feck me 28 goals in a side like Torino.
That is not to be sniffed at. Typical overlooking of a player in a small side. what does he have to do to get into the Spain squad?
Really? Cause it seems to me he's the most advanced player that started on our side bar Martial, which I suppose that's where a secondary-striker would appear.That was 4-3-3 with Rooney in midfield.
2 up front makes a lot of sense these days with more teams switching to 3 at the back though.
We don't need numbers for the sake of having numbers. We need a coherent system and players who will fit that system. A one striker formation with Morata as first choice, with Rashford and Martial as rotational cover is more than acceptable. Signing Belotti for 100m euros or whatever exorbitant price he'll cost only to have him sit on the bench makes virtually zero sense.My apologies but anyone who watched United last season, would understand we need players of the ilk you questioned! Quite self explanatory. However, if you insist, I can try and explain to you why we need "numbers". You will get bored
So, according to you what formation did we play Arsenal away (Rooney and Martial upfront), Chelsea away (Mkhitaryan and Rashford) and then at home (Lingard and Rashford). These were difficult, more defensive games and without Zlatan, so what do you expect coming next season when playing lower table teams at OT? I admit we can insist on 4-2-3-1 with a forward on the left (Rashford or Martial) and a striker upfront, but neither Rashford nor Martial can be used like that upfront and then we would only have Morata.
An attacking mid rather than another striker (assuming we're sticking with a similar formation). Don't know who though, hopefully someone good!Who are we signing more then, besides Morata? Or are you expecting that, after a season almost ruined by our last of finishing, we'll lose both Zlatan and Rooney and still just get one more striker? Mourinho would have to be mad for that.
We “decided” against Griezmann because he dumped us!I'm confused with Morata being used in many people's potential formations as a 10 or support striker as he's an out and out central striker, if we wanted a support striker or a 10 surely we'd not have decided against activating Griezmann's release fee seeing as Griezmann is arguably the best support striker in the game outside of Messi.
If Belotti had been in the season just gones form for 2 or 3 seasons then I'd say yeah let's go on for him but does anyone remember Immobile or Cerci who both had great seasons for Torino and scored lots of goals so got a big move to Dortmund and Atletico respectively and have done nothing since, one good season in a league where only one team wins and the rest can finish anywhere isn't enough for me to want us to spend £80 million on.
No. But what clubs say in press briefings isn't always true.
As if Mkhitaryan, Mata, Lingard wasn't enough of that?An attacking mid rather than another striker (assuming we're sticking with a similar formation). Don't know who though, hopefully someone good!
Not two strikers, man, two forwards!We didn't play with two strikers in any of those games. We (pretty much) always play either a 4-2-3-1 or a 4-3-3. With wide forwards and attacking midfielders in addition to a striker.
That was when we used to play 2 strikers in a 442. We now only play one striker, so need half as many.We always had four strikers, top strikers. Not one and three mix and matches.
Maybe why we only score half the goals.That was when we used to play 2 strikers in a 442. We now only play one striker, so need half as many.
Could be!Maybe why we only score half the goals.
We don't need numbers for the sake of having numbers. We need a coherent system and players who will fit that system. A one striker formation with Morata as first choice, with Rashford and Martial as rotational cover is more than acceptable. Signing Belotti for 100m euros or whatever exorbitant price he'll cost only to have him sit on the bench makes virtually zero sense.
I suppose you can follow suit of suggesting any other radical formations like a 3-5-2 or an ordinary 4-4-2, but I'd be extremely surprised to see Mourinho line us up in anything other than a 4-3-3 or a 4-2-3-1.
With Griezmann playing as a second forward - a role neither Morata not Belotti are very well suited forAtletico Madrid have been successfull in a 442 the past few years.
He's not that much ahead of Herrera in that graphic. Anyway, it wasn't a 4-4-2. If it was, Rooney would have been much closer to their CBs when they had the ball (he was in midfield mostly).Really? Cause it seems to me he's the most advanced player that started on our side bar Martial, which I suppose that's where a secondary-striker would appear.
We don't need numbers for the sake of having numbers. We need a coherent system and players who will fit that system. A one striker formation with Morata as first choice, with Rashford and Martial as rotational cover is more than acceptable. Signing Belotti for 100m euros or whatever exorbitant price he'll cost only to have him sit on the bench makes virtually zero sense.
I suppose you can follow suit of suggesting any other radical formations like a 3-5-2 or an ordinary 4-4-2, but I'd be extremely surprised to see Mourinho line us up in anything other than a 4-3-3 or a 4-2-3-1.
It will, as always with Mourinho, unless he really trusts the attacking flow of the team, dependent on the adversary. Tactical flexibility will be of use constantly. Now, lower table teams should be welcomed to OT with two powerful forwards, not overcautious 4-3-3.If we sign him we're playing 2 up top, simple as that. Maybe as the two striking options that Lingard and Rashford played as v Chelsea. Everything is pointing to 3 at the back imo.
Have you seen them play? Cause they actually excel at ball recovery tracking back, and specially Belotti is a pain in the ass following midfielders around. Of course they haven't got playmaking characteristics, but when facing buses at home, half our games, they would be most useful.With Griezmann playing as a second forward - a role neither Morata not Belotti are very well suited for
Make it a 4-4-1-1, then, if that makes you happy. The point is, since Rashford played upfront, Mourinho felt the need to have someone closer to him than Zlatan needed. And I'm seeing more and more of that coming next season.He's not that much ahead of Herrera in that graphic. Anyway, it wasn't a 4-4-2. If it was, Rooney would have been much closer to their CBs when they had the ball (he was in midfield mostly).
Don't disagree with your view on the formation but I still don't think it's overkill though.
Say Perisic and Morata (assuming both sign) get injured/lose form, Martial and Rashford cover those positions then who? Lingard? Rooney? Not ideal. We'd still be one short with two attacking additions. While Depay didn't play much last season, he was an option and still hasn't been replaced.
What 'done us over' was ridiculous amounts of game-time down to being in the Europa League and weak rotation when it was possible. You guys are being too extreme with your hypothetical injuries. We'd have slightly more cover than any of our direct rivals.So who would your cover be on the wings if Martial and Rashford don't start on the wings? What happens if Morata gets injured? Who will rotate Rashford/Martial then? Are either Rashford or Martial adept at holding up the ball like Morata/Belotti do?
What done us over towrds the end of last years campaign was numbers. Not just numbers but quality. Reality is, we need numbers, especially with the likes of Zlatan & Rooney leaving. Ok, Rooney hasn't left but you can clearly see Mourinho will not play him.
Having 3 players for every position definitely is overkill but if you insist we must replace Memphis, those minutes could go to someone like Pereira.Don't disagree with your view on the formation but I still don't think it's overkill though.
Say Perisic and Morata (assuming both sign) get injured/lose form, Martial and Rashford cover those positions then who? Lingard? Rooney? Not ideal. We'd still be one short with two attacking additions. While Depay didn't play much last season, he was an option and still hasn't been replaced.
Not saying it should specifically be Belotti but I really think three attacking additions is the right number. That's also taking into account that hopefully Rooney does move on because even if he stays I really can't see him being used much.
It's a long season. Hopefully we'll have a run in Europe and the cups and we need adequate cover and competition for places for that. Competition keeps players on their toes, they should be looking over their shoulder worried about their place. If the Martial of most of last season turns up, we should have enough adequate options to sit his arse in the stand. He needs a massive improvement in form and attitude to be relied upon anyway.
In 4-2-3-1, Mourinho's favorite template, we now have 5 players (Lingard, Mkhitaryan, Mata, Martial, Rashford… I'm not counting Rooney) for 4 positions, and if you just add, as expected, Perišić, Morata and Belotti, we get exactly 8 players, so precisely what we need. Of course, if you're imagining we'll play 4-3-3 all the time, 8 is way too much. But we aren't, so no worries there.Having 3 players for every position definitely is overkill but if you insist we must replace Memphis, those minutes could go to someone like Pereira.
I did. Griezmann is roaming around looking for openings, he has good vision and passing, etc. How is their workrate and pressing are going to compensate for that?Have you seen them play? Cause they actually excel at ball recovery tracking back, and specially Belotti is a pain in the ass following midfielders around. Of course they haven't got playmaking characteristics, but when facing buses at home, half our games, they would be most useful.
We played 4-3-3 for large parts of last season and our team is well suited to playing it again next season. I'm not sure how you can be so dismissive.In 4-2-3-1, Mourinho's favorite template, we now have 5 players (Lingard, Mkhitaryan, Mata, Martial, Rashford… I'm not counting Rooney) for 4 positions, and if you just add, as expected, Perišić, Morata and Belotti, we get exactly 8 players, so precisely what we need. Of course, if you're imagining we'll play 4-3-3 all the time, 8 is way too much. But we aren't, so no worries there.
Even by your logic, since Rashford isn't a striker who can play alone upfront now, we still need two, one to start and another to be on the bench.We played 4-3-3 for large parts of last season and our team is well suited to playing it again next season. I'm not sure how you can be so dismissive.
But either way, it doesn't make sense to sign another striker if we continue to play a one striker system.
Good goal, good run. He will give us goals no matter what. I hope we sign him as well.
If we're signing an additional striker - which we don't need - solely to be a bench player, it won't be 100m Eur valued Belotti.Even by your logic, since Rashford isn't a striker who can play alone upfront now, we still need two, one to start and another to be on the bench.
Of course he can. He was far more effective there than he was on the wing too.Even by your logic, since Rashford isn't a striker who can play alone upfront now, we still need two, one to start and another to be on the bench.
It wasn't a 4-4-1-1 though, it was a 4-3-3. And 4-4-1-1 isn't two up front.Make it a 4-4-1-1, then, if that makes you happy. The point is, since Rashford played upfront, Mourinho felt the need to have someone closer to him than Zlatan needed. And I'm seeing more and more of that coming next season.
What 'done us over' was ridiculous amounts of game-time down to being in the Europa League and weak rotation when it was possible. You guys are being too extreme with your hypothetical injuries. We'd have slightly more cover than any of our direct rivals.
Morata*, Martial, Rashford, Mata, Mkhitaryan, Lingard, Perisic*, and at a push, Pereira. That's 8 players. Contrast that to those around us; Chelsea seem to have 5 (Hazard, Costa, Willian, Pedro, Michy); Liverpool have 5 (Mane, Coutinho, Firmino, Origi, Sturridge); Spurs have 7 (Kane, Alli, Eriksen, Son, Lamela, Janssen, Sissoko); Arsenal have 7 (Alexis, Ozil, Giroud, Welbeck, Walcott, Ox, Iwobi, Perez). Only City will have more, and they overload themselves with about 5 of those starting anyway, so it's not really numbers for cover.
I'd assume each of those will make one or two signings, or end up replacing - i.e. Lukaku for Costa. All will end up on similar-ish amounts of attackers. Most likely anywhere from 6-8 attackers for most of the top sides.
Bench player? If Morata's injured and we need to fight back a result at home against a bus, who will you put, Martial or Lingard or Mata, all known for their amazing heading abilities? Oh, I see, you want to keep relying on Fellaini…If we're signing an additional striker - which we don't need - solely to be a bench player, it won't be 100m Eur valued Belotti.
Forget it, I see you're one of those fans who see a 4-3-3 in everything.It wasn't a 4-4-1-1 though, it was a 4-3-3. And 4-4-1-1 isn't two up front.
Bench player? If Morata's injured and we need to fight back a result at home against a bus, who will you put, Martial or Lingard or Mata, all known for their amazing heading abilities? Oh, I see, you want to keep relying on Fellaini…