If Carrick barely played last season (which is not exactly true), that just shows why Herrera had such high ball winning stats.
Matic is a replacement for an aging Carrick who either played or did not play. That is a fact.
In either case, who denied Herrera was a good ball winner? Just that it is not enough, and that circumstances favored his ball winning stats. His passing and what he does with the ball leaves much to be desired.
Erm, who cares about Matic's stats this season? Eyes are enough to see he's been great and in any case, season's not over. We have also had more control in the initial games than last season.
Nope, I pointed out that if Swansea game is his best position, he belongs on the bench. Saw that?
I am not judging him based on Pogba's position. I am simply saying we don't need a defensive B2B or a ball-winner who does feck all other than that. We don't need him in DM because if Matic. We also know he is not, or no longer, an AM to give Pogba competition.
Certainly was very damning, that these set of players scored less than Bournemouth. Precisely my point, that they did not perform well last season and so an average player like Herrera got POTY.
But this doesn't mean they are permanently so. Chelsea finished 10th and Leicester 1st, but that doesn't mean Chelsea are permanently shite. So, just a bad season for some good players.
Didn't I say in my last post that Matic is a replacement for Carrick?
Matic is a defensive mid, but he can also win the ball back, which he has done for us as well. Don't tell me a DM never does that. As he screens the defense well, we do not need a ball winner like Herrera.
Stop using hipster speak to dodge the obvious. Point is, we don't need two defensive minded mids, nor a ball winner whose passing leaves a lot to be desired.
He was vital cause we had no-one better. I never denied that. As an average player, he can "do a job".
Hypothetically, if Herrera and Matic get injured now, McTominay will be vital for us as he has to start every game. Doesn't make him a world beater.
Herrera is capable of 2-3 exceptional performances
and a bunch of average ones. I'd class that as average for a club like ours. If you think that is above-average, then these are personal terminologies not worth arguing over.
The simple point is, is he adequate enough for United to compete at the highest level? Answer is no.
Games where we require a three man midfield will be few. We will only require him to have a solid midfield againdt top teams.
If his passing was better and he was able to influence our attack more, Jose would bench Mkhi and go with a 4-3-3 now itself. That we play a 3 man midfield sparingly, is because we have a competent DM in Matic and a #10 is required as Herrera does not contribute much to attack. Think if Fellaini was available now, it us possible we might have tried a 4-3-3 and benching one of Mkhi or Mata due to poor form. Same cannot be said for Herrera.
A third ball winning mid or whatever terminology ou use for him, is not required for a top club.