RedBistro
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 4,314
I think he usually has A. Herrera?
Ok, we'll have to see I guess.
I think he usually has A. Herrera?
Think he's an indication van Gaal will play 4-3-3. He works best as either box to box or a playmaker in a midfield 3.Can he play in a 2 man midfield though?
This was posted 18 minutes after United announced the deal and after Herrera posted the pics on his own twitter.
This was posted 18 minutes after United announced the deal and after Herrera posted the pics on his own twitter.
Midfield would be my priority but I'd get a wide player.I would prefer someone who can play on both wings to replace Nani and Young.
This was posted 18 minutes after United announced the deal and after Herrera posted the pics on his own twitter.
If we sign Indi we'd have Indi, Ander, Jones.
I'll get my coat.
Only thing that worries me here is that last year we signed a guy who hadn't been playing regularly in CM and stuck him there. He's not looked at home, despite CM being his supposed natural position. We could do without Herrera taking a while to adjust.
Agreed. I just don't understand it.
It's pretty obvious, to be honest. When you support a club, you want it to allocate its scarce resources as productively as possible. 30m, or whatever, on a LB is a lot of money, especially when there might be an equally talented, or more talented, LB available for less.
United doesn't have the luxury of endless bankrolling and so mistakes, particularly expensive ones, are damaging to the club.
It's all very well saying, "It's not my money," but it is the money of the club you support.
It's pretty obvious, to be honest. When you support a club, you want it to allocate its scarce resources as productively as possible. 30m, or whatever, on a LB is a lot of money, especially when there might be an equally talented, or more talented, LB available for less.
United doesn't have the luxury of endless bankrolling and so mistakes, particularly expensive ones, are damaging to the club.
It's all very well saying, "It's not my money," but it is the money of the club you support.
And I can just imagine the welcome a response of plugging every hole with cheap £6m-£9m players would receive.
I think the people in charge are aware of how much or not we can spend. If we end up buying Shaw for whatever million pounds it is because we can afford it.
I think the people in charge are aware of how much or not we can spend. If we end up buying Shaw for whatever million pounds it is because we can afford it.
In the same way we could afford Fellaini, doesn't mean it was a good use of money. I'm well aware the club's managers will know the club's financial position. I'm saying I want our resources to be put to the most productive use.
It's not a difficult point I'm trying to make.
That calfAnder doesn't skip leg day...
Fellaini was obviously not a good use of money. Securing the left back position for the next decade would be very good use of money.