I prefer Quenda, don’t get me wrong Frimpong is quality, I just feel like he offers the same threat as Amad has at RWB.
I get he’s 17 but we’re not competing for 2/3 years, so if Amorim thinks he’s as good as we all think he is bring in the next generational star.
Wouldn’t be against either just think Quenda is the next world star.
But that's the thing, do we need a similar player type to Amad so urgently or can that wait for another year?
Besides, I don't know how expensive he'd be since Sporting will definitely want to keep him and what it would mean for the chances of a potential Gyokeres signing.
Comparing both players these are their pros:
Quenda:
- knows Amorim's system
- is younger, but a bigger gamble
- is left-footed, likes to cut inside
- Portugal connection (coaching staff, Bruno, Dalot)
- will need time to adapt to the English football tempo and physicality
- will likely be expensive (and what would it mean for a potential Gyokeres signing? Would Sporting allow us to get two players after we took their manager already?)
Frimpong:
- is a home grown player (massive plus!)
- more experienced, still "only" 24, yet he has only had one serious injury (Syndesmotic ligament tear, out for 53 days) in his entire career
- right-footed and has a good cross, which would benefit the new CF
- most likely cheaper, since he apparently has a release clause of £33m
- slightly better at defending (he's played as RB before and wasn't that bad, it's just not his main position)
- Dutch connection (De Ligt, Mazraoui, Zirkzee,
Ten Hag)
- likely to come in and become a starter right away
Both:
- have bursting pace, something we really lack in our squad
- compensate their lack of height with technique and balance, but have clear weaknesses in set piece defending
- are perfectly used to a 3 back system
For me many arguments are in favor of Frimpong, even though I clearly rate Quenda, too.
Just don't think it's the player that we need right now.