Amorim: «We are maybe the worst team in Man United history»

The relative challenges posed by the English and Scottish leagues in the 1980s were much, much closer than those posed by the Premier League and the Portuguese league in the 2020s.
Maybe, though the Scottish League as a whole was still a long, long way behind the prem. It still doesn't change the fact that exactly the same could have been leveled at Fergie when he joined. Point is that it's far too early to start writing Amorim off.
Would it not have been better to sell van der Beek before the situation became comical? Fergie had European success to his name, while Amorim's European record is mediocre at best.
Am I missing something? What's VdB have to do with anything?
 
Comparing every manager with Fergie will lead us nowhere, we already did that starting with Moyes.
Agreed but it's making the wider point that just because a manager arrives from a weaker league and struggles initially doesn't mean they're guaranteed to fail. Fergie is the best example of this.
 
So what's the alternative? Get another coach and play sitting deep with the odd counter attack again?

I'd rather burn everything to the ground and start up again, similar to Chelsea.

Backing a manager whose greatest strength is potential, while being very rigid in his formation and playing style, may be more detrimental than utilizing the current team's strengths and building from there.
 
Agreed but it's making the wider point that just because a manager arrives from a weaker league and struggles initially doesn't mean they're guaranteed to fail. Fergie is the best example of this.
Fergie should never be given as an example or be included in any comparisons. He is the fairytale of any football manager. His story will never repeat itself in our lifetime.

There are no guarantees, football is not just black or white, fail/succeed etc. Why would losing most of our games nowadays be an indication of potential success?

Backing a manager whose greatest strength is potential, while being very rigid in his formation and playing style, may be more detrimental than utilizing the current team's strengths and building from there.
I tend to agree it's much harder, if not utopic, to think that we will change a whole squad before we change the manager.
 
Fergie should never be given as an example or be included in any comparisons. He is the fairytale of any football manager. His story will never repeat itself in our lifetime.

There are no guarantees, football is not just black or white, fail/succeed etc. Why would losing most of our games nowadays be an indication of potential success?


I tend to agree it's much harder, if not utopic, to think that we will change a whole squad before we change the manager.
Nonsense - Fergie can absolutely be used as an example or a point of comparison and frequently is. It's just that you don't agree with this particular point of comparison. As I said, though, Fergie is just representative of the broader point that judging a manager this quickly and in such a knee-jerk fashion is risky and to think it's acceptable because he comes from a 'weaker' league is nonsensical. Slot came from the Dutch league and seems to be doing ok. Mourinho came from the Portuguese league and did great things. Fergie came from Scotland and built a new club. Also, re the bolded, who said that? It's a strawman. I never said that losing most of our games is an indication of potential success because that's stupid. I said that to judge the manager so quickly simply because he came from a weaker league is knee jerk and dumb.
The original post I was responding to suggested it was too early to judge Amorim. I used VdB as an example of when the club should have cut its losses sooner rather than later.
It's a silly comparison, in all honesty. Comparing a player that the management didn't want and that hardly featured to a manager that management wanted very badly and that seems intent on backing him makes zero sense. Also, if you do want to make that comparison, imagine if we had've gotten rid of Evra and Vidic based on what were (from memory) very slow starts...
 
.It's a silly comparison, in all honesty. Comparing a player that the management didn't want and that hardly featured to a manager that management wanted very badly and that seems intent on backing him makes zero sense. Also, if you do want to make that comparison, imagine if we had've gotten rid of Evra and Vidic based on what were (from memory) very slow starts...

We will see where the cards lay when it's all said and done, I don't see anything from this guy that suggests He will be a success in the long run. I hope I am wrong but I would rather not back an inflexible system that could leave us in a worse position this time next year.
 
Backing a manager whose greatest strength is potential, while being very rigid in his formation and playing style, may be more detrimental than utilizing the current team's strengths and building from there.
He better be very good in the transfer market because tactically he has shown very little so far. He just talks that we will become better down the line but I don't understand how we will become better? Does he need 9 new players or does he need a preseason to implement his ideas?
 
I lay all of this blame on the players. For all the talk about the "system" it's a red herring for me, an excuse. These are professional footballers. If they can't follow simple instructions then they should quit and go and find another job.

Instead of standing [here], stand [here] instead.
Instead of ambling back when you lose the ball, run back quickly.
Instead of hugging the touchline, play in field a bit.
 
I'm willing to give Zirkzee time.

I get that Hojlund is young but he's shown nowhere near enough to suggest he's going to be a top player.

Our attacking stats under Ten Hag this season were amongst the worst in the league by the way.
Rasmus was injured at the start if the season/ preseason and our joint top scorer last season. His conversion rate is very good, but we create nothing as a team. Our strikers will improve once the team improves.
 
He better be very good in the transfer market because tactically he has shown very little so far. He just talks that we will become better down the line but I don't understand how we will become better? Does he need 9 new players or does he need a preseason to implement his ideas?

Yes, some new players are needed. Not that many. I'd argue, though, that time is the most important thing. Since he's arrived they've had barely a handful of actual training days. I do believe that, even with limited transfers, a full offseason to fully implement the system will make a massive difference.
 
If we're going to be married to this set up, I gather the youth teams also need to, right ?
What happens to the development of fullbacks and wingers we have at the club ?
 
And at the moment, we have a big problem.
We certainly do, another consequence of the lack of succession planning following SAF/ David Gill's departure.

In giving over the Football side to Sir Jim, the owners have more or less admitted their culpability (of previously recruiting players as much for their ability to sell shirts, as to fitting into a playing style)
We have therefore finished up with a 'Motely Crew'/squad of players and now Ruben wants to try to fit square pegs into his round holed system, which is not going to happen, at least for a couple of seasons.

It was rumored that Ruben didn't want to come until the end of the season, and we can all see why; he isn't going to change and the players, even the ones who want to accommodate his methods, will need at least a full preseason training (possibly not even going to get that it ) to have any chance.

It seems a bit like we will shortly be called into quoting the Dad's Army character Pte Frazer ..."we're all doomed... doomed a tell yer".

Where's 'Big Sam' when you need him :lol::lol:
 
If we're going to be married to this set up, I gather the youth teams also need to, right ?
What happens to the development of fullbacks and wingers we have at the club ?
They become defenders, forwards, or wide players.
 
I agree about Ruud. That said, I think they honestly thought that the Glazers were so incompetent that no manager could succeed under them and he deserved more time. I partly understand the logic but he was obviously appalling at transfers and deserved no input.

Perhaps, the Glazers have been a hinderance to every manager including Fergie. But having said that I don't think Ten Hag would have been successful under any regime. The style of football he wanted to play was batshit.
 
The current results are only an issue for the manager if you are taking the view that he was brought in only to get immediate results and a short term bounce.

He said from day 1 that it was going to be hard. He said not to get excited after good results and he warned everyone this was likely to happen. If folk chose to ignore it because it wasn't what they wanted to hear then I guess that's their problem.

There are no guarantees with any manager but this one has had 8 training sessions and no signings and people are already suggesting he is fired... it's unbelievable really.
 
He better be very good in the transfer market because tactically he has shown very little so far. He just talks that we will become better down the line but I don't understand how we will become better? Does he need 9 new players or does he need a preseason to implement his ideas?

I don't understand the unwavering trust that many supporters have in him, especially without any solid evidence to back up his supposed prodigious coaching abilities. I hope I’m wrong and that he proves himself, but I have a feeling he may be out of his depth.
 
I don't understand the unwavering trust that many supporters have in him, especially without any solid evidence to back up his supposed prodigious coaching abilities. I hope I’m wrong and that he proves himself, but I have a feeling he may be out of his depth.
Yup. We struggled for goals before he arrived and started to play Dalot and Mazraoui as fullbacks. He seems very stubborn and can only play one formation. 2 lucky wins in the PL so far.
 
International caps don’t mean much I feel these days. I’d say most non English players in the PL are likely to have been or are currently full internationals for their countries.

Secondly in terms of players thriving at other clubs. If you look at the clubs they’ve thrived at and the league they’ve thrived in you quickly find your answer.
It’s funny but for years whilst it was fair to point out the PL tax for signing player being a deterrent, I now feel we’ve gone too far the other way and aren’t signing enough players from the PL or even the championship.

Dunno about what you felt but I can hand on heart say the only signing (since 2022) that had excited me or I was convinced would be instantly successful here was Casemiro. And although it’s gone pear shaped. His first six months here were light years above what any other signing has produced in the same period.

Look at our other signings in that time, all came from far lesser leagues. I think people get excited with any summer window. If you sign a few players people get giddy (see people rating the summer window just gonr as a 7/8).
But look at our last three summer windows and the overwhelming majority of signings have not come from top clubs or top leagues. And the ones who did come from top leagues (Hojlund/Zirkzee/Mazraoi etc) were not actually that successful for any substantial period at their old clubs. Casemiro and Eriksen were the two most established on paper when we signed them and I’d strongly argue what the pair produced between August 22 and March 23 is the best of every signing since that summer of 22. Unfortunately age has caught up to them.

So when you say thrive at other clubs. Martinez, De Ligt, Ugarte, Antony in particular thrived but thrived at top clubs in tin pot leagues.

You simply cannot bring in a load of players with this history into the prem and be successful.

Of course you are still right, we absolutely should not be 13th even with this squad but throw in a poor manager (ETH) poor club culture, and bad egos in the dressing room and it all adds to the horrificness and that’s when you find yourself 13th.
When ineos came in, they said themselves that they will be looking at managers who fit the system THEY want to play, so we can assume Amorim sets that mould, which in theory means the players they sign moving forward will be players suited to that system. Not an individual managers style but an overarching system, so if Amorim doesn’t work out, the players they have will still fit that criteria. They’ve gone out and bought a load of players last summer that don’t fit the very thing they stated would be the case. Why? Because a manager said he wants them? We know that doesn’t work.. look at the last 12 years? My point is ineos have made exactly the same mistakes we have been making for years now. It doesn’t fill me with confidence I can’t lie. Our recruitment is so so poor it’s almost laughable, it’s not a ETH thing, this was happening way way way before him. One sure fire decent signing in 12 years. Bruno. It’s that.

Amorim is clearly going to die on this hill, his system, which is fine, it means next season we will be more experienced with it and better prepared, makes sense, but we need points now. We’re 13th in the league and the players we have, like I said before, are better than 13th. The rate we’re going we’re genuinely going to finish in the bottom half of the table, when was the last time that happened? Fergies 88-89 season?

Time will tell, he will need a lot of financial support, do you feel confident ineos will give him that? I’m telling you now if ineos don’t pull off the spectacular there will be riots because why even feck with us if you can’t afford us? Why bother. We don’t need another glazers, we need actions and to see something different.
 
We certainly do, another consequence of the lack of succession planning following SAF/ David Gill's departure.

In giving over the Football side to Sir Jim, the owners have more or less admitted their culpability (of previously recruiting players as much for their ability to sell shirts, as to fitting into a playing style)
We have therefore finished up with a 'Motely Crew'/squad of players and now Ruben wants to try to fit square pegs into his round holed system, which is not going to happen, at least for a couple of seasons.

It was rumored that Ruben didn't want to come until the end of the season, and we can all see why; he isn't going to change and the players, even the ones who want to accommodate his methods, will need at least a full preseason training (possibly not even going to get that it ) to have any chance.

It seems a bit like we will shortly be called into quoting the Dad's Army character Pte Frazer ..."we're all doomed... doomed a tell yer".

Where's 'Big Sam' when you need him :lol::lol:
I didn't understand the urgency in getting Ruben in straight away. Our "best in class" bods must have known that (a) he plays a system that he adheres to, and (b) the current players may not be able to operate in the confines of that system. Didn't Wilcox see this? Didn't Berrada have a clue? This reminds me a bit of when the Doc took over mid season in 1972. We dodged relegation that year but he was unable to put a winning team together until we were on our way down. Fergie arrived mid-season too and look how long it took him to put a side together that was capable of winning trophies. United has got form for this type of thing. I just hope Ruben has the skills to build the side he wants but for now, it seems like it's all damage control.
 
He better be very good in the transfer market because tactically he has shown very little so far. He just talks that we will become better down the line but I don't understand how we will become better? Does he need 9 new players or does he need a preseason to implement his ideas?
That shouldn't be his job. He should have a say, sure, but managers are not scouts. We've wasted billions learning that expensive lesson.
 
I don't understand the unwavering trust that many supporters have in him, especially without any solid evidence to back up his supposed prodigious coaching abilities. I hope I’m wrong and that he proves himself, but I have a feeling he may be out of his depth.

To be fair, I don't understand why anyone is too critical of him either. He took over a shite squad, with injury plagued players and a shite attitude. To top that off, he was brought in directly before the busiest and hardest point in the season. He'd have told the club that he would want to use his own tactics and formation and they agreed to go with him yet so far we've had no transfers to help the guy out. We basically dealt him a shite hand with no ability to change that hand and some of you expect him to change the fortune of the club around immediately.

It's a load of bollocks. Either give the guy a fair shot and allow him to have a proper transfer window and pre season or just accept that this club will forever be a shit show as our fans don't have the patience to attempt to change formations or strategy because we can't cope with some bad form. The reality is the League was fecked, ETH did far too much damage, our best chance of having any kind of success this year is through our cup runs and so far we're doing pretty well. Personally I made peace that this Season was a write off and if we do well in the cups that will be a nice bonus to what will be a terrible season.

If we continue to have a string of poor results by December 26 then that'll be a different story.
 
We certainly do, another consequence of the lack of succession planning following SAF/ David Gill's departure.

In giving over the Football side to Sir Jim, the owners have more or less admitted their culpability (of previously recruiting players as much for their ability to sell shirts, as to fitting into a playing style)
We have therefore finished up with a 'Motely Crew'/squad of players and now Ruben wants to try to fit square pegs into his round holed system, which is not going to happen, at least for a couple of seasons.

It was rumored that Ruben didn't want to come until the end of the season, and we can all see why; he isn't going to change and the players, even the ones who want to accommodate his methods, will need at least a full preseason training (possibly not even going to get that it ) to have any chance.

It seems a bit like we will shortly be called into quoting the Dad's Army character Pte Frazer ..."we're all doomed... doomed a tell yer".

Where's 'Big Sam' when you need him :lol::lol:

Yes indeed.
 
I don't understand the unwavering trust that many supporters have in him, especially without any solid evidence to back up his supposed prodigious coaching abilities. I hope I’m wrong and that he proves himself, but I have a feeling he may be out of his depth.

Go back and look at the incredible dumpster fire that Sporting was when he took over. Players were literally being attacked on the training grounds by ultras and many simply walked on their contracts (one of which was Bruno Fernandes). The club was in absolute shambles...way worse than what we're seeing here. He turned them from a trophyless s***show to the dominating club in the league.
 
I lay all of this blame on the players. For all the talk about the "system" it's a red herring for me, an excuse. These are professional footballers. If they can't follow simple instructions then they should quit and go and find another job.

Instead of standing [here], stand [here] instead.
Instead of ambling back when you lose the ball, run back quickly.
Instead of hugging the touchline, play in field a bit.
Exactly. I'm a big believer that if you have good players, they can play in multiple positions, obviously, there will always be positions that outright don't suit players, but some of the mistakes our players make are the same as when they played in Ten Hag and Ole's reign. It's pretty obvious to me it's a player issue.
He better be very good in the transfer market because tactically he has shown very little so far. He just talks that we will become better down the line but I don't understand how we will become better? Does he need 9 new players or does he need a preseason to implement his ideas?
Feel like it's a rhetorical question. He needs his own players, and he needs to be able to have time to train his players yes.
 
Until he gets at least one summer window where he brings in players, i will not judge him. I'm a bit concerned about whether the tactics will work in the EPL, but I will fully support him until he has at least 2-3 players in that he wants.

But here's my take.

He said United are "being" maybe the worst team in Man United history. He said this after discussing how many games they have lost and their current record. So i don't think he was necessarily saying it's the worst squad or 11 they have ever fielded but they are playing like it. I think he was basically having a go at how bad they are playing. But at the same time, there is the undercurrent that the team, if this is what they can do, is shit.
 
Until he gets at least one summer window where he brings in players, i will not judge him. I'm a bit concerned about whether the tactics will work in the EPL, but I will fully support him until he has at least 2-3 players in that he wants.
We don't operate that way anymore. It's no longer "buy whoever the manager wants". That's a recipe for disaster.
 
Hard not to warm to Amorim for his honesty and the affable way he has fielded questions.

I think that 'worst team' quote was pretty stupid though. Your players are bad enough when they're playing for you, what happens if they down tools? While I wouldn't expect you to go down (too many bad teams), it's not a foregone conclusion. Some of Mourinho's quotes towards the end of his (second) Chelsea and Manchester United stints made me wonder if he was actively trying to be sacked and that Amorim quote gives off similar vibes.

He's also something of an idealist in that he appears determined to stick to a system come what may and one that doesn't appear to suit your squad. At first I thought this might be a good thing as I thought Ten Hag was ultimately too pragmatic, sacrificing a style of play and method for short-term results,. However, I'm starting to think it might be worth Amorim being a little more pragmatic for now, get some results and then start to remodel your system and style of play. Also interesting that Liverpool reportedly got cold feet about his system and they've got a whole lot more right than you have in recent years.

That said, i think he's entitled to a few transfer widows before folk start pulling him to bits. Not a lot of this is his fault, but it does appear if he's made things unnecessarily difficult, even if there's some truth in what he said.
 
We don't operate that way anymore. It's no longer "buy whoever the manager wants". That's a recipe for disaster.
Well he has a unique system which requires inside forwards and wingbacks. So we will need players adept at those roles. THey knew his system and surely knew they would need to make specific purchases to have it work here.
 
Go back and look at the incredible dumpster fire that Sporting was when he took over. Players were literally being attacked on the training grounds by ultras and many simply walked on their contracts (one of which was Bruno Fernandes). The club was in absolute shambles...way worse than what we're seeing here. He turned them from a trophyless s***show to the dominating club in the league.

Since 2010 Sporting has had 10 top-three finishes (including 2 winning seasons) they weren't slumming it. I also don't put any stock in achievement in the 7th-best league in Europe.



To be fair, I don't understand why anyone is too critical of him either. He took over a shite squad, with injury plagued players and a shite attitude. To top that off, he was brought in directly before the busiest and hardest point in the season. He'd have told the club that he would want to use his own tactics and formation and they agreed to go with him yet so far we've had no transfers to help the guy out. We basically dealt him a shite hand with no ability to change that hand and some of you expect him to change the fortune of the club around immediately.

It's a load of bollocks. Either give the guy a fair shot and allow him to have a proper transfer window and pre season or just accept that this club will forever be a shit show as our fans don't have the patience to attempt to change formations or strategy because we can't cope with some bad form. The reality is the League was fecked, ETH did far too much damage, our best chance of having any kind of success this year is through our cup runs and so far we're doing pretty well. Personally I made peace that this Season was a write off and if we do well in the cups that will be a nice bonus to what will be a terrible season.

If we continue to have a string of poor results by December 26 then that'll be a different story.

Claiming that ETH, who is a far more accomplished manager with a flexible playing formation, has harmed the team while wanting to support a less experienced manager who needs specialist players, seems counterproductive to me. This team is better than the bottom half of the table, and if he can't lift them out of that position by the end of the season, retaining him would be a poor decision.
 
Since 2010 Sporting has had 10 top-three finishes (including 2 winning seasons) they weren't slumming it. I also don't put any stock in achievement in the 7th-best league in Europe.





Claiming that ETH, who is a far more accomplished manager with a flexible playing formation, has harmed the team while wanting to support a less experienced manager who needs specialist players, seems counterproductive to me. This team is better than the bottom half of the table, and if he can't lift them out of that position by the end of the season, retaining him would be a poor decision.

It's clear to everyone that ETH fecked this team. All the evidence supports that, from our poor goal scoring, to our abysmal defending.

You're complaining about a Manager that hasn't had a single transfer or even a pre season. Sorry, but you're talking utter, utter nonsense.
 
It's clear to everyone that ETH fecked this team. All the evidence supports that, from our poor goal scoring, to our abysmal defending.

You're complaining about a Manager that hasn't had a single transfer or even a pre season. Sorry, but you're talking utter, utter nonsense.

Is blindly backing a manager who has no significant achievements (Liga Portugal is average) and is likely to finish in the bottom half of the standings not the more nonsensical choice? I’m not saying he should be sacked tomorrow; rather, I believe he should be let go if we are still in the bottom half at the end of the season.
 
Is blindly backing a manager who has no significant achievements (Liga Portugal is average) and is likely to finish in the bottom half of the standings not the more nonsensical choice? I’m not saying he should be sacked tomorrow; rather, I believe he should be let go if we are still in the bottom half at the end of the season.
Fecks sake, you're looking for a miracle worker not a coach, at the very least he needs the January and summer transfer windows to get some players that are suited to the style we want to play, we haven't had a proper left back all season never mind a LWB, he's inherited a left wide forward who doesn't want to make any serious effort, 2 aging midfielders who don't really have the legs to play the roles we need, he doesn't have a striker that can score goals, even SAF in his prime couldn't fix this in the timeframe you are suggesting Amorin should have
 
I don't understand the unwavering trust that many supporters have in him, especially without any solid evidence to back up his supposed prodigious coaching abilities. I hope I’m wrong and that he proves himself, but I have a feeling he may be out of his depth.
It’s not unwavering trust. It’s what’s obvious. If we didn’t make it with this team with 2 managers, then there are many more who will come and go.

We don’t do a reset, the best we get is a Europa league position and more of the same.
 
Until he gets at least one summer window where he brings in players, i will not judge him. I'm a bit concerned about whether the tactics will work in the EPL, but I will fully support him until he has at least 2-3 players in that he wants.
Sporting turned over Man City 4-1 not so long ago playing this system.

Given time and the right players then this system will work against any EPL side.