DannyCAFC
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2014
- Messages
- 2,551
- Supports
- Charlton Athletic
The point is the focus will be on developing talent, not buying in established talent.
How many "no brainer" signings have we paid big money for to come in and make an impact on a massive deal?
How many have worked...?
And big money signings always seem to work out so well for us
Well it's just about options, isn't it? Having multiple players in a position that could pan out and be an integral part of the team is probably a good thing rather than putting all your eggs in one basket... I'm just saying that a lot of people here seem to be of the mind that Amass is nailed on as a sure thing and that you therefore don't need need to spend money on improving the position as a whole.
Given he's 17, there's a good chance he either might be out on a loan spell or two and/or have his minutes managed carefully over the next 2, 3, 4 seasons anyway and that's even if he manages the step up to a level he's never played at before and starts to fulfil his potential - in which case there is a quite obvious need for a more established option.
Yes United have made bad big money signings in recent years, but you can't then just blanket say 'well we shouldn't be spending big money on players'. End of the day Davies is one of the best players in the world in his position, would probably be a great fit if Amorim adopts his favoured 3-4-3 system as expected and is out of contract so it would be foolish to not at least consider him. Obviously there will be questions about his motives if he was indeed interested in joining which will need to be weighed-up, but overall I see fewer obvious red-flags than pretty much every other big money transfer United have completed in recent years.