Don't forget Ray Wilkins
Alejandro Garnacho (out) | Chelsea make enquiries
- Thread starter Luca[4]
- Start date
If we sell to a rival then it has to be 100 million for Nacho and nothing less. They had no problem sign Mudryk for 100 euro's or close who had an unproven track record so if chelsea want to jump we should be making them pay over the odds It's a whole different ball game selling to a foriegn club with a potential buy back clause then selling to a direct rival who will be benefiting from in the same league
Ideally if we are intent on selling him then he must go to Napoli for 60 million since they themselves usually demand high fees for their own players
Ideally if we are intent on selling him then he must go to Napoli for 60 million since they themselves usually demand high fees for their own players
£100 milion for Chelsea after we giving them £50 million for Mount
is that a serious question? It’s a weird one for sure.
He was under previous managers. Mourinho didn’t rate him but he was 25 and quite obviously didn’t have the potential to get much better at that point. Selling a 20 year old Garnacho because we need money is a completely different type of transfer.
What are we going to do, just sell every 20 year old that’s a bit inconsistent? He’s been overplayed and figured out a bit, he needs time to adapt his game, but he’s still a huge talent that we have very rarely had in the last decade from our academy.
This isn't going to happen.
Source - me.
Source - me.
Would rather not sell to Chelsea, but it would be funny after benching Sancho here, he followed him to London to kick him down the pecking order their.
It’s very hypothetical but I would, don’t see either making it big in this league but obviously I’m in minority here with such perspective.
People using Utd’s past poor signings as a bar for other clubs to meet makes no sense to me.
We signed Antony for 80m and Mount for 55m in two signings universally recognised as terrible value, yet we expect other clubs to get close to these figures for our players? Someone explain that one to me..
There’s no way anyone can seriously think Garnacho for 60m is selling ourselves short surely
We signed Antony for 80m and Mount for 55m in two signings universally recognised as terrible value, yet we expect other clubs to get close to these figures for our players? Someone explain that one to me..
There’s no way anyone can seriously think Garnacho for 60m is selling ourselves short surely
If we essentially end up swapping Garnacho for mount 
Honestly I'd be fine with him leaving. I get the feeling that he thinks he's much better than he actually is, and has a bit of Rashford syndrome. I don't really see where he fits into the current formation either.
What if the club think he isn't just inconsistent but simply isn't particularly good? Makes it a trickier proposition to turn down.
No. Mainoo is a special talent, Garnacho is just a good talent.
Two players with glaring holes in their Game , with £150 m on the table I say why not .
Mount was what 24/25? Mata was at his peak, just won their player of the season.
Some of ye lot would sell your missus to a drug cartel for a twix bar
Surprised to see so many people saying they accept £50m. If the roles were reversed then there's no chance we'd get someone of Garnacho's profile for that price.
For the people going on about getting rid of Rashford or Antony first - we need demand to actually move them on. There's not much we can do presently if the demand for them isn't there, and they aren't doing everything they can too to make a move happen.
Exactly. It’s why someone like Lindelof is still here and Smalling went years ago, one was actually wanted and there was interest. You can’t force teams to want these players.
Or stop clubs pissing money away recklessly
So had Mount, the season prior and the season prior to that!
What's weirder is you saying that us selling a player Amorim deems not fit for his system for a good fee is Chelsea somehow making a statement. Maybe it's us making a statement to the rest of the squad that no one is safe? No it can't be. It's got to be the plastics from London making a statement.
Is that why he keeps playing him?
@Judas doesn't think that's us making a statement though but if we sold Garnacho that's them making a statement. Didn't know we had a closet Chelsea fan amongst us.
Napoli selling Kvara for £68m he has similar goals per minute but double assists per minute, and much more about his game than Garna, so the price is less than £68m by at least a bit, add to mix that we are up financial shit street and have a history of underselling, £50m would be a minimum with a sell on clause included but it is realistic if we are actually serious about selling
This is going to shock you but during the busiest period with a squad lacking attacking options, the manager will make use of squad players. I know, it's shocking. Garnacho doesn't look comfortable in Amorim's system, so come summer, he will probably bring in a player who is a better fit.
Luckhurst doesn't know shite
That's not how this works. Garnacho is much younger and doesn't push for an exit.
I wouldn’t sell for 50m as I think Napoli will offer more - and I probably wouldn’t sell to Chelsea barring a crazy 90m offer - but if the roles were reversed we wouldn’t be trying to sign someone of Garnacho’s profile - his profile does not fit this system.
Weird how that doesn't apply to Casemiro, Rashford and in large parts Antony
He's a little younger not 'much younger'
Three years is not a little when you're 20 ffs
Only for a specific type of club, which probably doesn't include United at the moment. For most clubs it doesn't really matter what type of players they sell, if anything it's a bit better to keep the academy players and sell players with high book value.
Maybe but it certainly isn't as notable as you're trying to make out. Some exaggeration going on there.
Yeah you tell these old codgers
20 and a half years I'll have you know!
Why would Chelsea want garnacho when Estavio is arriving from Brasil and plays in the same position?
This is Chelsea we are talking about.