Just about to say this - I’d accept him going to Chelsea but they’re paying a lot more than a club from abroad.
He’s contracted until 2028 so either pay up or he stays.
Alejandro Garnacho (out) | Chelsea make enquiries
- Thread starter Luca[4]
- Start date
He’s contracted until 2028 so either pay up or he stays.
They started selling hotels.
It feels like such a glaring design fault in the PSR rules that they essentially incentivize clubs to sell home-grown players. Surely that’s not something anyone wants?
Have they Airbnb'd the bridge
There's not one thing in Garnachos game that screams world class. With a lot of interest in him now would be the best time to sell as he won't bring in another offer as good as this in the future. For once please can we sell at the right time. Missed an opportunity to sell Bruno in the summer (instead we gave him a fat new contract that we'll regret in 2 seasons) don't make the same mistake now.
is mydruk any good for a LwB role? he's blazing fast isnt he?. and Isnt Nkuku a good inside forward player? how did they turn so many players to shit? they're probably worse than us
Why do people are set against selling domestically? Seems very small time.
It is small time.
Selling to a rival a player that helps them and makes us weaker? I know you think he’s bobbins, so your opinion is simply you don’t give a Feck.
As long as we get fairly rewarded I see nothing wrong with it unless you have a comparable bid from outside of the league.
I see it as exactly the same as selling them Sancho.
Take it and go!!!!
It would be an awful deal, and I don't rate Granacho that highly.
The sporting director and techincal director do make signings and sells without consulting with the manager. Do you think the Man City board signed and sold players without Guardiola's input? The difference is the previous board gave veto to the manager and let him dictate and sign who wanted. This is not the same thing at all under Ineos.
I agree some people are impatient when it comes to young players, but sometimes we are guilty of being too patient or thinking just because a player is young then they are going to improve and become world class.
But this isn't about whether garnacho improves or not it's about whether he's worth keeping if he doesn't fit with Amorims system. I like Garnacho and think he's always positive on the pitch but he is not a generational talent who is ever going to be the player people imagine him to ever becoming and we should not be putting a players career and how we'd like to see them ideally progress above the manager's and club's plan
Lavia?
Totally different situations to me. Sancho has proven his level in this league, average. Plus we wanted rid quite clearly. Garnacho still has time on his side to show more, even if I’m not sure he’ll fulfill the early promise/hype.
Yeah but if the club decides to sell him then ultimately they don’t think he’s that good and can replace him with someone better.
Like you say I don’t think he’s amazing but I’m not really bothered if he stays and wants to be a rotation option. Just can’t see him being satisfied with that.
People really need to stop this romanticism, it held us back post fergie thinking we could get another long term manager and it’ll hold us back if we aren’t ruthless with any player, academy or not. We literally do not play with a left winger and he’s a left winger who’s shown nothing to suggest he can play as a 10 or LWB. Take the cash and let it fund the rebuild.
I suppose I still have a nagging doubt in this clubs ability to do this, even though we do have a new team in charge of this aspect. We need to start properly upgrading our average talents.
If Chelsea make a 150m double bid for Kobbie and Garnacho do we accept?
Fully agree of course, it’s on them from here on out to prove they can do it.
The summer will be very interesting.
Burn this post with fire
Chelsea have players like Nkunku, Chukwuemeka and Madueke available, are there any deals to be done here? Could do some creative accounting in terms of fees which would probably be beneficial to both clubs.
No I wouldn’t sell Mainoo at present.
Wouldn't sell Kobbie to a PL side.
It would certainly be a big statement about where we are as a club. Shite.
feck off chelsea
100m or feck off.
Chelsea need to pay up for Sancho first. Once that bill is paid they can ask about others.
I always find it funny that in Italy you have players that have played for Inter, Juventus and Milan and it never seems a big deal there. United and Chelsea have been selling each other players for a while. Same to a lesser extent with Arsenal and United.
Personally I’d be sad if Garnacho left but I trust the manager and the club structure to have assessed his qualities. maybe he isn’t right for this system we’re committed to.
I can see him leaving eventually, but certainly not now and especially not for the money being mentioned. There are no good alternatives in January and we have other priorities in terms of getting people out of the door. Namely Rashford and Antony who contribute absolutely nothing.
I think the PL part of this should be irrelevant, if we sell him further down the line it will be because he turns out to not be good enough.
Feeder club to the elite
They will pay up. That’s how an obligation works.
And to Chelsea
Was it a big statement when they sold Mount to us and the donkey to arsenal? Or when they sold us Mata? Or Matic?
If we sold him it wouldn’t be to any elite clubs.
How old were those players? There’s a big difference.
Mata was their best player at the time arguably. Or certainly one of them.
Mount for Garnacho makes me sad