Dorgu and Ayden Heaven, potentially Nkunku - which I'd be against unless it's in addition to keeping Garnacho.Laurie Whitwell said that we are working on other things so yes.
There is no mystery 10.
Dorgu and Ayden Heaven, potentially Nkunku - which I'd be against unless it's in addition to keeping Garnacho.Laurie Whitwell said that we are working on other things so yes.
I don't think Nkunku would be as well as Garnacho. I'd quite like that though.Dorgu and Ayden Heaven, potentially Nkunku - which I'd be against unless it's in addition to keeping Garnacho.
There is no mystery 10.
I think INEOS has now spotted that the club has bought a lot of players who are neither quick nor physically strong over the past few years. Prioritising stronger faster players in future will significantly improve our prospects both with Amorim and, in the event he leaves, someone else. It's not about his system - we were being out run and out muscled before.
I'm not sure about Dorgu but it seems from what I've read one of the main reasons for going for him is that he's a beast who is strong on the ball and can run up and down all day.
Looks like the interest has died down.
He may not be everyone's cup of tea right now, but giving on up on him so early is crazy. Like it or not he is a big part of why the last few months were not worse, with his goals and assists.
Find money elsewhere, selling him sets the entirely wrong tone for the future. He's clearly putting in the work, as the manager has brought him back in the fold big time.
As I suspected
They’ve watched him play it seems.
It was a joke mate.If they watched him play they would've surely seen that he's better than Mudryk/Neto/Madueke/Sancho?
As I suspected
They’ve watched him play it seems.
You put a strange amount of faith on journalists opinions.
As I suspected
They’ve watched him play it seems.
As I suspected
They’ve watched him play it seems.
IIRC Matt Law is quite reliable when it comes to Chelsea. And it does seem like talks about Garnacho to Chelsea have gone quiet now after it looked close to done deal just few days ago. If he does stay now, can still see us selling him come summer, whether to Napoli, Chelsea or somewhere else. One of few players (perhaps even only one) that can bring us big fee and enable signing a striker in summer.
It’s Matt LawYou put a strange amount of faith on journalists opinions.
It’s Matt Law
He's the most reliable journalist for Chelsea stuffIs he tier one Chelsea because he’s a Chelsea fan or just a more reliable journalist? If anything, Garnacho value went up since Chelsea interest, so if he is a fan he’d likely spin that they aren’t interested anymore when reality is he’s too expensive for them to go for in January.
We all see it differently of course but he wasn't that great against Rangers or Fulham for me. Couple of good moments and chances created but not much more. Don't think it was kind of performances that would make people at Chelsea go and sign him asap.He’s played quite well lately, I think. Especially against Rangers.
My dream signing at ST is Isak but that's not happening. Even if Newcastle were to accept our offer it would be some huge fee that we can't afford given our financial issues and need to strengthen in other positions as well.Would you go Gyokeres/Osimhen or look elsewhere for a striker just out of interest
Ruben accommodating him in a more comfortable wider role for me is a clear sign of the coach not wanting this lad to be sold. He doesn’t strike me as the flexible type when it comes to the formation so Garnacho playing wide and Maz playing more centrally is a good indicator.
Ruben accommodating him in a more comfortable wider role for me is a clear sign of the coach not wanting this lad to be sold. He doesn’t strike me as the flexible type when it comes to the formation so Garnacho playing wide and Maz playing more centrally is a good indicator.
65m for Garnacho coming up. Hope we don't sell him, he is clearly giving his all..Adeyemi has turned Napoli down.
We won't sell him for 65m65m for Garnacho coming up. Hope we don't sell him, he is clearly giving his all..
Yes we wouldWe won't sell him for 65m
Great pointGood point. I've been on the fence on selling him but I think I'm leaning towards not doing it. Him and Rashford were the two who were dropped for the City game, Amorim presumably challenged them to sort out their attitudes.
I'm assuming that the reason Garnacho is back in the side, with as you say, Amorim slightly tweaking the system to get more out of him, is because he's done what Amorim wanted him to do when he and Rashford both got dropped and sorted himself out.
Now what kind of message would it be to sell a young player who's done what was asked of him the first chance you get? And imagine if Garnacho was the one sold and Rashford stays...so we're getting rid of the kid who's put in the effort and the senior player who has said he's "ready for a new challenge" stays,
Exactly. With few days left in the window we would be crazy to sell as we won’t have time to bring someone else in. Unless they have already lined someone up of course, but I don’t see who is available who could make a positive difference to our attackWould be absolutely crazy to sell now, we need his threat more than ever now. One of the only players who can create and score.
Good point. I've been on the fence on selling him but I think I'm leaning towards not doing it. Him and Rashford were the two who were dropped for the City game, Amorim presumably challenged them to sort out their attitudes.
I'm assuming that the reason Garnacho is back in the side, with as you say, Amorim slightly tweaking the system to get more out of him, is because he's done what Amorim wanted him to do when he and Rashford both got dropped and sorted himself out.
Now what kind of message would it be to sell a young player who's done what was asked of him the first chance you get? And imagine if Garnacho was the one sold and Rashford stays...so we're getting rid of the kid who's put in the effort and the senior player who has said he's "ready for a new challenge" stays,
Keep in mind we have no other options right now. I reckon Mount will be ahead when he returns. If he returns.
Signing Dorgu and limiting him to being tucked inside also seems unlikely to me. I think this is Amorim being flexible, but in the long run he’ll be looking for a player to perform that role better.
And we should be asking for more. We always get rinsed for players. If we value Garnacho at 60m which I think is a reasonable price given his potential and age then that’s what we should hold out for. We need to get back to being powerhouses in the market and not walk overs.If they watched him play they would've surely seen that he's better than Mudryk/Neto/Madueke/Sancho?
Luckily it just looks like we are pricing him out of a move. Napoli and Chelsea wanted him for "reasonable money" which we are clearly asking for more.
There were three ways this could have gone -
(a) no talk of transfers and he stays (my preferred option),
(b) talk of transfers and he's sold (what looked likely with Napoli/Chelsea), and
(c) lots of interest, talks, negotiations and bids but no final move away
(c) can end up destabilizing the player, though I don't know how else the club could have gone about things once they decided he was for sale to sort out our financial mess. Another problem with the strategy in the first place, though.
Wild considering both clubs corresponding current standingAdeyemi has turned Napoli down.
Ruben accommodating him in a more comfortable wider role for me is a clear sign of the coach not wanting this lad to be sold. He doesn’t strike me as the flexible type when it comes to the formation so Garnacho playing wide and Maz playing more centrally is a good indicator.