Dembeza
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2015
- Messages
- 539
I’m shocked that you are shocked, this is the CAF.I am honestly shocked that some people are actually arguing that Poch is a better manager than Jose. I am honestly shocked.
I’m shocked that you are shocked, this is the CAF.I am honestly shocked that some people are actually arguing that Poch is a better manager than Jose. I am honestly shocked.
I’m shocked that you are shocked, this is the CAF.
I do agree.
But would jose win anything with a spurs level club? Would poch win with a big club?
Why do people suddenly erase PORTO from their memories when talking about Jose? And how about Inter winning that CL?
Didn't you see the guy how replied on this saying he was lucky at this time to have top players as Deco and Carvalho ? They are even stripping this success from him and giving it to other universal reasons.
Pochettino is a good manager end of story. Look what he did with Southampton and look at them now. Look at Spurs before he took the reigns. If you don't fancy him that's fine, but any suggestion he's overrated or somehow doesn't have a "winning mentality" (I personally hate when fans use this made up rubbish as an argument) is utter nonsense. His teams regularly dominate smaller opponents and play well against larger opposition. The same people slagging off on him will go missing if Spurs win a run of matches.
Didn't you see the guy how replied on this saying he was lucky at this time to have top players as Deco and Carvalho ? They are even stripping this success from him and giving it to other universal reasons.
Not just the CL, a bloody treble.Why do people suddenly erase PORTO from their memories when talking about Jose? And how about Inter winning that CL?
Doesn't that reasoning make Poch look worse? He had Kane and Erickson and he still couldn't win anything with the club.
The notion that Spurs have squad depth issues is such a myth. All the players they've being signing for ages is being veiled by a summer where they signed none and sold none.Their squad definitely is overrated on here. The first team is a competitive but they have serious depth issues. Still you are correct that they do have bottling mentality that we see with many sports teams that haven't won anything in a long time. They definitely should have won a small trophy in this period when they are good. That is a blot on Pochettino. However, I didn't know mentioning that they didn't strengthen in the summer is going to be so contentious with some. It's bewildering.
It will be the new Manchester United way.So you want to follow up the negative bore fest of Lvg and Jose with simeone? Wow
I'm still on the bandwagon. Would love him here after José wins the quadruple.3 defeats in a row, and the hype bandwagon has ever so slightly calmed down.
Now I would subscribe to this timeline.I'm still on the bandwagon. Would love him here after José wins the quadruple.
Porto once yes.
Would he win with that level of team now?
The notion that Spurs have squad depth issues is such a myth. All the players they've being signing for ages is being veiled by a summer where they signed none and sold none.
It will be the new Manchester United way.
Glorious Boredom.
You have Dier, Wanyama, Winks, Dembele and Sissoko for two positions.Have you seen our bench options? We are severely lacking in central midfield for starters.
You have Dier, Wanyama, Winks, Dembele and Sissoko for two positions.
You are not the only team that have issues at CM though. Even City can only call on Fernandinho, Gundogan, Douglas Luiz and Delph. It's not much better than yours.Having numbers does not necessarily mean depth - look at the quality there - not much.
Having numbers does not necessarily mean depth - look at the quality there - not much.
I don't get it with Hotspur fans, when we tell them they have a good team they'd downplay it till no end as if they're fecking watford. Just so that they can justify Poch not winning anything and that top 4 is the holy grail of hotspur. As if you're actually supporting Pochetinoo and not Tottenham.
bottler's mentality, when you accept this notion that your manager can't realistically win any trophies you might as well pack it up.
Having numbers does not necessarily mean depth - look at the quality there - not much.
Why do people suddenly erase PORTO from their memories when talking about Jose? And how about Inter winning that CL?
Because its by far the massive exception.
Inter were hardly some tottenham level team either
Oh but they were, they were shit before he took over and shit after he left, and are still shit today, they only won every thing when Jose was coaching, but no he was lucky according to you haha.Because its by far the massive exception.
Inter were hardly some tottenham level team either
Well, Liverpool have only 4 midfielders for 3 spots, and Chelsea have the likes of Drinkwater and Barkley in case Kante got injured, which is underwhelming.
In Liverpool match you had the likes of Sanchez, Wanyama, Son and Aurier on the bench, how is that poor ? Are the other teams have any superstars on their bench ?
The only team in the league with great depth is City, otherwise, you will only find good depth in the likes of Madrid, Barca..etc.
Almost all English teams don't have any good sub to replace their best player if he gets injured. United can't replace Pogba/Lukaku, Chelsea can't replace Hazard, Liverpool can't replace VVD/Salah/Keita, same to Spurs can't replacing Kane. It's not an issue for Spurs alone to be used as an excuse.
I'm talking about central midfield - Wanyama is coming back from serious injury and is barely able to take part at present, behind him we have Sisokko who is one of the most useless midfielders in the league. Not great depth in central midfield - good depth in other areas I agree but it's CM i'm discussing.
Lack of investment or not he has a good team on his hands and had it last 2, 3 years. I think it's fair to say he should have won something with it. He probably won't do it this year either but he'll get his list of usual excuses, lack of investment being one of them.Funny how there are some posters in here using our lack of investment this summer to defend Mourinho but calling Poch overrated and not good enough for us ... despite Spurs complete lack of investment. At least Jose had 500m to spend in the last 3 years.
Oh yeah, they also just beat us 3-0.
Personally I'd love him here after Jose.
Oh yeah it's all luck.Yes. That said, you can always get lucky. He stumbled across a good Porto team including a few players that would go on to dominate in Europe (Deco, Maniche and Carvalho). And the road to victory was surprisingly easy. The only one of the teams he met in the knock-out that was among the two best teams in their league that year was Lyon (Monaco finished 3rd in Ligue 1)
Deportivo and Man Utd was not at their best. We had a back four consisting of P. Neville, W. Brown, G. Neville and Fortune (O’Shea for Fortune in the second match), and a 19/20 year old Fletcher as a winger and Butt and Djemba in midfield.
They did well to win it. But not many teams get a route like that.
Phew we can finally close this thread.
I mean, does anybody really think Pochettino is a bad manager?
He's not elite, and he's definitely not as good as Jose (who has won it all) but he's quite clearly done good jobs at both Southampton and Spurs. He improved both these clubs whilst spending very little, whilst playing attractive football and developing a number of players.
There's definitely an argument to be made that he's overrated, or that links to elite clubs are unwarranted due to his lack of trophies, but I don't see how you could argue he's a 'bad' manager. Surely that tag would go to the likes of Moyes or Pardew, guys who nearly always end up making the team they manage worse?
Oh but they were, they were shit before he took over and shit after he left, and are still shit today, they only won every thing when Jose was coaching, but no he was lucky according to you haha.
This.
To be fair it's not you spurs fans who overrate him it's our own fans. If the constant overrating and contrasting standards of Poch weren't so prominent on this forum there really wouldn't even be an argument to be had.
I am honestly shocked that some people are actually arguing that Poch is a better manager than Jose. I am honestly shocked.
Obviously Poch isn't a better manager, you're right, that's because Jose has a history of winning and Poch hasn't done anything like that yet. However Poch is a lot younger than Jose and has shown a lot of promise as a manager whereas lets face it, Jose has completely lost his magic touch in the last few years. I don't think it'd overly radical to suggest that in the next four to five years Poch could be a better manager than Jose, given one's rise and the other's decline. As I said, I'd like Poch here after Jose is gone, not for us to sack Jose and get him in (i'd only do that for someone like Zidane).Lack of investment or not he has a good team on his hands and had it last 2, 3 years. I think it's fair to say he should have won something with it. He probably won't do it this year either but he'll get his list of usual excuses, lack of investment being one of them.
Also I can't phantom how can anyone think Poch is a better manager. Jose had difficulties up until now at United but on the other hand he won trophies and his 2nd place is being downplayed and Poch's top 4 finishes are regarded as some kind of mercurial success. Not to mention now in an attempt to glorify Poch some United fans (which is strange to say the least) downplay even his Porto and Inter successes.
Jose will be judged at the end of the season but Poch, win or lose, will get his excuses.
It's strange that United fans defend a Spurs manager all the while shitting on their own. Maybe I'm too old school to get my head around it.
Fair enough. We will see. I don't this it's radical but who knows, there's no 100 percent guarantee he'll succeed in a bigger club. Also I don't agree Jose completely lost his touch but that's for another thread. I hope.Obviously Poch isn't a better manager, you're right, that's because Jose has a history of winning and Poch hasn't done anything like that yet. However Poch is a lot younger than Jose and has shown a lot of promise as a manager whereas lets face it, Jose has completely lost his magic touch in the last few years. I don't think it'd overly radical to suggest that in the next four to five years Poch could be a better manager than Jose, given one's rise and the other's decline. As I said, I'd like Poch here after Jose is gone, not for us to sack Jose and get him in (i'd only do that for someone like Zidane).
Your first paragraph makes me laugh, you could genuinely use the exact same thing for Jose.
Spurs fan making the most sense here, respect.It's standard 'grass is greener' syndrome. People always want what they don't have, but I guarantee if they got it that Pochettino wouldn't live up to their lofty expectations. Your quality of football may improve, but he can be an incredibly frustrating, stubborn manager who also simply isn't on the same level as Jose in terms of sheer ability to win trophies, which at an elite club is always an expectation. I don't think he's ready for United at all yet, he needs either a few years more at a club like us (Or if he does move on, another club on a similar level) because he still has a lot to learn. Some of the mistakes he makes on the bigger occasions simply wouldn't be accepted regularly by the biggest teams.