Red Dreams
Full Member
He wasn't the only one...but it's funny because, he's always wrong
highly entertaining fellow though.
He wasn't the only one...but it's funny because, he's always wrong
I hope the US doesn't reduce itself to voting in the wife of a former president. I mean FFS, we are talking about what is supposed to be a serious democracy here. The son of a former president being elected just 8 years after his dad was bad enough.
I hope the US doesn't reduce itself to voting in the wife of a former president. I mean FFS, we are talking about what is supposed to be a serious democracy here. The son of a former president being elected just 8 years after his dad was bad enough.
The other option could be a guy whose brother and father were 2 of the last 4 presidents.
She isn't running as the wife of a former President. She's running as herself and as a citizen has every right to do so.
The other option could be a guy whose brother and father were 2 of the last 4 presidents.
Yeah, just like Mrs Shinawatra of Thailand, Mrs Jagan of Guyana and Mrs Kirchner of Argentina. All women who by remarkable coincidence (and nothing else) managed to be elected as presidents soon after their husbands had left office.
Yep. And it's worrying that Americans don't see this as an indicator that something it wrong with their democracy.
Bush I
Clinton
Bush II
Obama
Bush III/Clinton II
Maybe Chelsea Clinton can have a pop in 2024.
Yeah, just like Mrs Shinawatra of Thailand, Mrs Jagan of Guyana and Mrs Kirchner of Argentina. All women who by remarkable coincidence (and nothing else) managed to be elected as presidents soon after their husbands had left office.
Yep. And it's worrying that Americans don't see this as an indicator that something it wrong with their democracy.
Bush I
Clinton
Bush II
Obama
Bush III/Clinton II
Maybe Chelsea Clinton can have a pop in 2024.
Yeah no, Hillary is a JD from Yale, a senator and secretary of state on her own accord. That's mighty impressive no matter her family relations.
Yeah no, Hillary is a JD from Yale University, a senator and secretary of state on her own accord. That's mighty impressive no matter her family relations.
She'd never have been the Senator from NY without having been married to the President and thus would never have been Sec. State.Yeah no, Hillary is a JD from Yale, a senator and secretary of state on her own accord. That's mighty impressive no matter her family relations.
She'd never have been the Senator from NY without having been married to the President and thus would never have been Sec. State.
She became a senator and secretary of state AFTER her husband was elected POTUS!
Keep dreaming.
From what I have seen of Sanders, I like him.
Would I be right in thinking he is unelectable?
Her husband may never have made president without hillary beside him eitherShe became a senator and secretary of state AFTER her husband was elected POTUS!
Keep dreaming.
She'd never have been the Senator from NY without having been married to the President and thus would never have been Sec. State.
Her husband may never have made president without hillary beside him either
Did I say that? No so what point are you trying to make? Reality is without being the First Lady she never would have had the opportunity to be NY's senator and thus Sec. State.Would she also not be able to pass law school if her husband wasn't Bill Clinton? She was a partner at a law firm, a congressional legal counsel before marrying Bill and if her public office credentials don't work out, she also served on the board of directors for Walmart while living in Arkansas.
All I said is she would not have been NY's Senator. Which let's face it is true.I don't get this criticism for Hillary. Love her or hate her, she's a highly accomplished person. If Barbara Boxer, Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand can be US Senators without being the wife of a former US president, why couldn't she?
I'd say it's easy to be a Jackie Kennedy or Diana. It's fecking hard to be Hillary Clinton.
That is a valid pointHer husband may never have made president without hillary beside him either
All I said is she would not have been NY's Senator. Which let's face it is true.
I don't which is why I made no claim about that.It might be, just for the sake of argument let's agree on that. But how do you know had she not married Bill she wouldn't be Senator of another state?
I don't which is why I made no claim about that.
You did say she wouldn't have been Secretary of State, though.I don't which is why I made no claim about that.
Look the two Bush boys would never have gotten on the world or national stage. Where would JFK and RFK and Teddy have gotten without their Dad's money and connections? Hillary's career path is tied directly to being Bill's wife. Al Gore's political career was certainly aided by his Dad being a Senator from Tennessee. And so on and so forth.
This does mean they are all incompetent and would never have achieved anything with their lives. It just recognizes something that helped them along their current path.
You did say she wouldn't have been Secretary of State, though
But I don't think Hilary Clinton particularly has it easier than the Bush brothers, for example, or many of the other examples of people who got into power because of family ties.
Well she is smarter than the Bush brothers.I think that's widely accepted, to be fair. The impression I get of American politics is that it's full of people who largely are where they are because of their connections. But I don't think Hilary Clinton particularly has it easier than the Bush brothers, for example, or many of the other examples of people who got into power because of family ties.
She and Bill built their wealth, influence and political muscles together from scratches. That's a damn sight better than W and Jeb, JFK or Al Gore.
Much the same way people say Hillary is where she is now because of her husband, you can say he wouldn't be 42nd without her along the way.
Much the same way people say Hillary is where she is now because of her husband, you can say he wouldn't be 42nd without her along the way.
Well she is smarter than the Bush brothers.
The rest of my post that you snipped said basically exactly that. This conversation goes back to someone saying America would be reducing itself by voting for her, which is what most people here are arguing against.First Lady to NY Senator to Sec. State the connections are clear.
It has nothing to do with putting her down because she is female. I pointed out make politicians who owe their positions to family connections
I hope people realize I have not said she is unqualified.Yep, that's mostly the point I'm making. She's undoubtedly benefited from her husband's position greatly, but there are plenty of others who had ridden their family ties to a greater extent. Clinton's certainly been heavily involved in politics anyway, so she's not really any less qualified than the other Democratic candidates. Probably more qualified than a lot of them.