Scarecrow
Having a week off
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 12,364
Exclusive preview of the 2016 Presidential Debates below:
Never gets old.
Exclusive preview of the 2016 Presidential Debates below:
I don't see anything in his life that makes me think he cares about fairness.
He literally believes that he is smart because his dad was rich! With that kind of worldview, there is no fairness. And with his talk of "winning", "losers", "great", "destroy", he is very pro-conflict too.
Then they'll pick him and he/Dems will not just look stupid, they'll suffer too. "Sri" seems to be quite anti-environment based on his past cases as a lawyer as it is, and one of the big upcoming fights before the SC is on the EPA.
He is definitely moving to the middle.
Not sure who he will pick to draft out his policies. Should be interesting.
I don't think he's moving anywhere. He'll be wher he always is, in the land of gaganonsense (Like how you think Hillary is a phony and always remains a phony)
He certainly has mentioned centrist policies.
He certainly has mentioned centrist policies.
To confirm Godwin's law, but not because I want to say he's a new Adolf: the Austrian c*nt was economically a left-leaning centrist. Doesn't mean he was any good at actual economic policy. Or strategy for that matter. Its not about what you want to do, its about what you actually manage to do.
To confirm Godwin's law, but not because I want to say he's a new Adolf: the Austrian c*nt was economically a left-leaning centrist. Doesn't mean he was any good at actual economic policy. Or strategy for that matter. Its not about what you want to do, its about what you actually manage to do.
Trump sounds a lot like Arnie when he was running for CA governor. He came in with all these big ideas about shaking things up and besting the 'girlie men' in the legislature. He ended up losing all of his major legislative fights and being pretty ineffective. His biggest successes occurred when he teamed up with dem speaker Fabian Nunez and put together compromise legislation.
Trump can bluster from the WH but it won't do anything.
He has so far created the policies of 'we love America', 'we'll do it the right way', 'We'll beat ISIS', 'We'll beat china, Japan', 'We'll build a wall', 'We love winning', 'Weak', 'Jeb!'
To confirm Godwin's law, but not because I want to say he's a new Adolf: the Austrian c*nt was economically a left-leaning centrist. Doesn't mean he was any good at actual economic policy. Or strategy for that matter. Its not about what you want to do, its about what you actually manage to do.
You also have to imagine that the Clinton machine has a massive amount of attack material they are waiting to unleash on Trump.
The left isn't in love with large corporations.
will agree ol Adolf should not have broken the nonaggression pact with Russia.....
seriously. You are not a fan of Trump I take. Who would you have preferred?
Oh, but the historical left-wing, not full on communist, statesmen have been. If they realize that they can't "take the means of production" as Marx preached, the next best thing has always been figuring out which large capitalists would be buddy buddy with them. The whole unions x companies way of managing the economy only works if the companies are large, not if the whole thing is fragmented. It also eventually comes from a desire to be an exporter of goods, which means that large national companies get subsidies, tax breaks, etc.
Sanders talks his talk... if he were President for two terms and midway through Boeing comes knocking, saying that the higher taxation means they had to up prices, are losing out to Airbus in major contracts and are now looking to lay off some 1,000 employees due to reduced demand. What does Sanders do?
Put in an import barrier
My order of preference for the Presidency runs (ran):
1. Kasich
2. Bush
3. Clinton
4. Christie
5. Rubio
6. Cruz
7. Sanders
8. Trump
If Biden had ran he'd rank in no. 2 for me ahead o Jeb!, which means that realistically he'd be my no. 1. As of now I just hope Clinton has it in her to stay steady through the year. I know Sanders is a well-meaning, honest guy. I want money out of politics too. Its just that socialism, of all the things I've thought long and hard about in my life, is one I'm convinced doesn't actually work. On a philosophical level I find little to like about it, probably because I'm an individualist.
Mitt Romney on Fox moaning about Trump not releasing his taxes. You can't make this shit up!
I'm surprised the Clintons haven't been using surrogates to hammer Rubio too. Straight out of the Nixon playbook of divide and conquer.
hmmmm. Scandinavians prove it does work. and it can work here in the States. The will is missing though.
That's a whole other debate, and an interesting one. http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/Sanandajinima-interactive.pdf
hmmmm. Scandinavians prove it does work. and it can work here in the States. The will is missing though.
First Ohio poll that I've seen. These were what I used to follow regularly 4 years ago, and what made me confident Obama was in.
Primaries:
Trump 33
Kasich 29
Cruz 11
Rubio 10
Sanders 45
Clinton 44
2 scary scary points:
- A near majority of respondents would like to see a Republican capture the White House in 2016 (49%), with 38% preferring that a Democrat remain in the Oval Office, and an additional 8% undecided.
Kasich wipes both Hillary and Sanders out in his home state. I can't see him agreeing to join the Trump clownshow though.
- Hypothetical match-ups:
- Trump v. Clinton: It’s a tie (39% to 37%, respectively) with 20% of likely voters expressing that they wouldn’t vote for either candidate, and an additional 4% undecided.
The single reassuring data point:
- Trump v. Sanders: Sanders wins 43% to 38%; and suggests that the populist message is popular among both liberals and conservatives.
Vote Bernie to stop Trump
They are more afraid of the word than anything else. people hear socialism and think of USSR or some failed state.
Social Capitalism is a better way to describe countries like the Scandinavians, and should be used more by Bernie.
That's a whole other debate, and an interesting one. http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/Sanandajinima-interactive.pdf
I don't have time to go through the whole thing but a document is titled Scandinavian unexceptionalism. When Scandinavian countries consistently score near the best on poverty, education, mobility, they are, by definition, exceptional.
Conservatives think he's a liberal, liberals think he's a Nazi
Conservatives think he's a liberal, liberals think he's a Nazi
hmmmm. Scandinavians prove it does work. and it can work here in the States. The will is missing though.