2016 US Presidential Elections | Trump Wins

Status
Not open for further replies.
i dont understand this, so Iowa has only less than 2000 registered Democrats?

30d2b966-6c26-4e31-a02e-fff944f6c8e2.png
That refers to delegates or whatever.
 
i dont understand this, so Iowa has only less than 2000 registered Democrats?

30d2b966-6c26-4e31-a02e-fff944f6c8e2.png

No. In each station people vote, and the number of electors(?) from that place is handed out in proportion. This refers to the electors (or whatever they are called)
 
"I might come back here and buy a farm" he should have followed it with "like you all buy a burger"

I'm pretty sure you could make a sophisticated sentence generator that would mimick Trump with ease. His particular brand of pandering is retarded, I can't believe people buy it.

Not to mention his fecking business anecdotes.
 
11 people voted for Jim Gilmore. In a whole state only 11 people voted for him. Is this the most pathetic campaign of all time? :lol:

I mean even Carly passed the 1000+ barrier.
 
lol, just saw this on facebook:

"That ironic moment when Bernie Sanders literally needs the 1%"
 
They can both declare victory, you'd assume. The margin of error is so small, that a recount would be needed.
 
They can both declare victory, you'd assume. The margin of error is so small, that a recount would be needed.

There are no paper votes! So no counting.
In delegates it's 21-20 right now, 3 to go. If he gets 1 more, he has tied.
 
Take a listen to the Canadian clown, Rafael Cruz.

I'm not going to lose any sleep worrying that he'll ever be elected potus, but there are way too many fecked up Americans who eat his stinking fecal matter.
 
Very pleased about Cruz. If Trump had won he'd have the nomination pretty much sealed up you'd think. Now there's a fighting chance.
Cruz has no chance. I'd imagine Rubio wins the nomination from here, and he's batshit crazy. Not that Trump is much better. The GOP is a farce, only it's actually dangerous.
 
Clinton is not going to be the next president.. No way.
She sounds robotic
 
Well my dream president would be Rand Paul, but that really has no chance of happening. At the moment, I'll settle for any Republican bar Trump.
Have you heard what Cruz and Rubio are about? American Exceptionalism, evangelical nonsense, etc. It's Bush mk II. Probably worse, because Bush at least had semi-intelligent people overseeing everything he did.
 
C'mon lads, she'd be a great president. First day in office, she goes and tells IS to "cut it out", and already she's done a world of good.
 
She's an idealist of the very worst kind. Take a look at who backs her... she'd be more at home in the Republican party (the old one before the likes of Bush and co transformed it into a carnival).
 
Have you heard what Cruz and Rubio are about? American Exceptionalism, evangelical nonsense, etc. It's Bush mk II. Probably worse, because Bush at least had semi-intelligent people overseeing everything he did.
My problem with Bush was really the war and the neo-cons, more than anything else. I mean he talked rubbish but he was the only president in recent history to attempt to fix social security. Of course it went nowhere and then 9/11 happened and it all went to hell.

In general, I care less what presidents say and more about what legislation / executive orders they'll push. Obama talked a lot of pro-immigrant rhetoric but his policies were much worse than Bush in that regard. I could see Cruz being a decent president. Uncertain about Rubio.
 
She's an idealist of the very worst kind. Take a look at who backs her... she'd be more at home in the Republican party (the old one before the likes of Bush and co transformed it into a carnival).

The only way she is an idealist is that she believes she'd be President in an ideal world, and that she'll do whatever she can to bring that about, even if she disagrees with it.

Back to 0.2% now!
 
The only way she is an idealist is that she believes she'd be President in an ideal world, and that she'll do whatever she can to bring that about, even if she disagrees with it.

Back to 0.2% now!
Neo Liberal idealism. America's Thatcher.
 
My problem with Bush was really the war and the neo-cons, more than anything else. I mean he talked rubbish but he was the only president in recent history to attempt to fix social security. Of course it went nowhere and then 9/11 happened and it all went to hell.

In general, I care less what presidents say and more about what legislation / executive orders they'll push. Obama talked a lot of pro-immigrant rhetoric but his policies were much worse than Bush in that regard. I could see Cruz being a decent president. Uncertain about Rubio.
The neo-cons you despise are pretty much the writers of the doctrine to which Cruz and Rubio subscribe. American Exceptionalism, massive army, invasions, rule the world by divine right, etc.
 
Trust me. Reagan and Thatcher were socialists compared to this new lot. well not quite that far.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.