Spiersey
Full Member
I imagine the committee are extremely pleased Guan still made the cut. Unlucky by Tiger but still fancy him to win it.
I don't think they'll take the interview as gospel, but surely they'll have to review the tapes.
The PGA haven't been afraid of making these calls before. Remember the guy was DQ'd for testing the sand a few years age in a major.
just got in the official site: http://www.augusta.com/
it's funny how they don't talk about cabrera even though he is sharing the fourth position, while they talk about players that arent even close to him
i remember this happening a few years ago, when he won it.
selfcentered arent they?
Tiger is too big of a draw for them to disqualify. No chance of that happening.
just got in the official site: http://www.augusta.com/
it's funny how they don't talk about cabrera even though he is sharing the fourth position, while they talk about players that arent even close to him
i remember this happening a few years ago, when he won it.
selfcentered arent they?
At the end of the day, it doesn't matter who is playing and made that same shot, the rules are the rules and for me, Woods should be disqualified, otherwise it will set a precedent where others will do it in future tournaments and will use what happened to Woods in their defense should he not be disqualified. Cheated on his wife, and he is now cheating against his fellow professionals, what a low-life.
It's always the same, mate. Television broadcasters always follow the main draws, and suffice to say, Angel Cabrera isn't high on their priority list. Jason Dufner and Ryan Moore are two who are within a few shots of the lead and I don't recall seeing a single shot by either of them so far. And I've been watching pretty much every minute of the coverage so far.
It's because (like when he won it), the chances are he isn't going to be up there at the end, so they won't waste their screen time on him. If he starts well today though they'll start showing him.
You don't really think he was cheating do you? You're allowed to place the ball further back, it just needs to be in line. At worst I think he's misinterpreted the rules.
At worst he's hiding in plain sight.
It's because (like when he won it), the chances are he isn't going to be up there at the end, so they won't waste their screen time on him. If he starts well today though they'll start showing him.
You're allowed to place the ball further back, it just needs to be in line.
Well then he's definitely in the shit because he went back in line of his original shot, not the line the ball took when entering the water. If he was to go further back but in line, he'd have been taking his drop shot somewhere under the grandstand at the 15th, to the left of the pin (as you're hitting the shot.)
Strictly speaking, he's in the wrong. I doubt he'll be punished, though.
The Masters isn't a regular PGA Tour event, and nor are any of the other three Majors. They do employ PGA Tour/European Tour officials, though.
A World number one "misinterprets the rules." Come on Liam, no-one is that stupid, least alone Woods. He knew what he was doing all along.
Well then he's definitely in the shit because he went back in line of his original shot, not the line the ball took when entering the water. If he was to go further back but in line, he'd have been taking his drop shot somewhere under the grandstand at the 15th, to the left of the pin (as you're hitting the shot.)
Strictly speaking, he's in the wrong. I doubt he'll be punished, though.
A World number one "misinterprets the rules." Come on Liam, no-one is that stupid, least alone Woods. He knew what he was doing all along.
I actually meant to say 'accidentally broke the rules', but from what nahealai said, I don't think that's the case.
So he's got to take it from the line it went into the water (off the pin)? Not the line he took the shot from.
In the midst of yesterday's live text commentary, my colleague Ben Dirs described Woods taking that second shot from "pretty much where he was before".
Turns out that "pretty much" is not quite good enough according to the rulebook.
Woods carelessly revealed in his post-round interview that he had taken the ball back a couple of yards from where he hit the first shot on his second go.
Technically that should be a shot penalty. Technically, by signing for a card without that penalty, Woods could be disqualified.
Will 'technically' turn into reality? The Augusta officials are set to investigate and we are waiting to find out...
Do you think if Tiger bent the rules on purpose he would openly admit doing it in a press conference? Use your brain instead of your agenda against Tiger
Bizarre. Why would he admit taking the drop from the wrong place?
James Corrigan @jcorrigangolf 1m
get ready for a big green shit bomb to explode. tiger's going to get off with a 2-shot penalty...
Hunter Mahan @HunterMahan 10m
I've heard a two shot penalty for Tiger. Interesting
Do you think if Tiger bent the rules on purpose he would openly admit doing it in a press conference? Use your brain instead of your agenda against Tiger
With the cameras the sporting world has to offer, it would have been picked up anytime. Secondly, I dislike any form of cheating in sports, whether it is Busquets, Ronaldo or Young in Football, Armstrong or Cancellara in the Tour De France or Woods in Golf. This is not an agenda against Woods. He is a good player, but he is not above the rules. So, use your brain before criticising those whom you think have an agenda against one particular person when it is in fact against cheating in sport in general.
Making an error unawares to yourself is not cheating.