Adam-Utd
Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 39,954
haha yeah, he's definitely had it shaved off also! FFS. poor guy.Does look a bit red here in fairness
haha yeah, he's definitely had it shaved off also! FFS. poor guy.Does look a bit red here in fairness
If he had that done, someone has definitely led him to believe the deal was on.haha yeah, he's definitely had it shaved off also! FFS. poor guy.
Poor guy. Dreams shattered by Perez.
Alvaro Morata 'dyed his hair' red for Man Utd unveiling before move collapsed - reports
http://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...-red-hair-dye-Manchester-United-transfer-news
Then I hope we didn't mislead Morata to move Everton along or get at Perez. I know it is always good to make Perez look bad, but not at a players expense.I would be very surprised if we put in more than an enquiry for this guy. Lukaku says in an interview that he knew for a couple of months that he is coming to United, I remember he even came out with some interviews a month or so back where he said he knows where he's going, but everyone assumed it was Chelsea.
The fact we were actually negotiating with United is because he wanted to leave. If he didn't, we wouldn't even have listenedMorata will be fine. As has been said, if he wanted to leave he would have forced his exit but did not say anything to the press.
The choice of Chelsea seems very complicated, as well as Mbappé, so presumably he will have to compete again with Benzema.
Surely next time his agent will be more cautious
We got the wrong striker, methinks. I would have preferred Morata to Lukaku. Better technique and composure, and therefore better link up play. I think he's a great finisher, too. Did pretty decent in the CL.
Hope Chelsea don't get him.
I have the same fear. I do wonder why we were only willing to go to £66m for Morata. And I wonder why, if Lukaku was first choice as the media has been briefed, did we submit a final bid for Morata just a day before agreeing a fee for Lukaku...? Was Morata actually first choice, but only up to a certain price? Why value Lukaku at £24m higher?We got the wrong striker, methinks. I would have preferred Morata to Lukaku. Better technique and composure, and therefore better link up play. I think he's a great finisher, too. Did pretty decent in the CL.
Hope Chelsea don't get him.
Marca disagrees.Does look a bit red here in fairness
We got the wrong striker, methinks. I would have preferred Morata to Lukaku. Better technique and composure, and therefore better link up play. I think he's a great finisher, too. Did pretty decent in the CL.
Hope Chelsea don't get him.
I have the same fear. I do wonder why we were only willing to go to £66m for Morata. And I wonder why, if Lukaku was first choice as the media has been briefed, did we submit a final bid for Morata just a day before agreeing a fee for Lukaku...? Was Morata actually first choice, but only up to a certain price? Why value Lukaku at £24m higher?
I have the same fear. I do wonder why we were only willing to go to £66m for Morata. And I wonder why, if Lukaku was first choice as the media has been briefed, did we submit a final bid for Morata just a day before agreeing a fee for Lukaku...? Was Morata actually first choice, but only up to a certain price? Why value Lukaku at £24m higher?
Morata will be fine. As has been said, if he wanted to leave he would have forced his exit but did not say anything to the press.
The choice of Chelsea seems very complicated, as well as Mbappé, so presumably he will have to compete again with Benzema.
Surely next time his agent will be more cautious
I fear you are correct. Hope we are wrong.We got the wrong striker, methinks. I would have preferred Morata to Lukaku. Better technique and composure, and therefore better link up play. I think he's a great finisher, too. Did pretty decent in the CL.
Hope Chelsea don't get him.
We got a proven premiership goalscorer and you think Morata was the less risky option? Because until he actually does it he is a risk no matter how good he is. I feel he could be great but we'd of had to hoped there was no adjusting period.I fear you are correct. Hope we are wrong.
You can be a proven Premiership goalscorer and be unsuitable for a top side. I think Morata is as close to a sure thing as you can get.We got a proven premiership goalscorer and you think Morata was the less risky option? Because until he actually does it he is a risk no matter how good he is. I feel he could be great but we'd of had to hoped there was no adjusting period.
With Lukaku its hitting the ground running.
Since when is 25 goals a season unsuitable?You can be a proven Premiership goalscorer and be unsuitable for a top side.
De Gea + cash!?Worth a De Gea plus cash swop?
Aubameyang and Belotti are both very good players though, hardly scraping the barrel.
If he had done that he would have been in an even worse situation, we would have dropped him anyway and he'd be damaged goods for Real Madrid's fans.Don't feel sorry for him, if he wanted to be here he should've pushed for the move and submitted a transfer request instead of worrying about cutting ties with Madrid.
Don't feel sorry for him, if he wanted to be here he should've pushed for the move and submitted a transfer request instead of worrying about cutting ties with Madrid.
De Gea + cash!?
I wouldn't even entertain a Morata + cash offer for De Gea.
Bale, Kroos + cash or Ronaldo
Silly post. Don't write stuff like that.Worth a De Gea plus cash swop?
bonySince when is 25 goals a season unsuitable?
We got the wrong striker, methinks. I would have preferred Morata to Lukaku. Better technique and composure, and therefore better link up play. I think he's a great finisher, too. Did pretty decent in the CL.
Hope Chelsea don't get him.
Worth a De Gea plus cash swop?
Marca disagrees.
He was a one season wonder.bony