prtk0811
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2016
- Messages
- 7,854
Aren't they ?
Absolutely not
Aren't they ?
I don't think either club was out of line, honestly. Madrid had all of the bargaining power and rightfully tried to extract as much as they could and we agreed personal terms but couldn't come to an agreement with the club. It's not particularly uncommon but what magnifies it is the media circus that comes with a megatransfer between United and Real
I think Chelsea are in a better position now that we're going for Lukaku. Despite Madrid's posturing they need to sell Morata and bring in Mbappe. in their minds he was going to United and they wanted to play chicken to get as much money as possible. Suddenly we've walked away and they need a buyer.Absolutely not
How? With Lukaku is not an option (still an if until he signs), they need to sign a forward since Diego Costa clearly wants the transfer. Don't forget Hazard's injury so they're without 2 of their main attacking options at the beginning of the season if they don't have a new forward. Chelsea would play right into Madrid's hand. With Perez's form, he may as well tapping Hazard & Courtois in the process
But they are not so desperate as we where, Griezmann transfer didn't gone according to our plans,Zaltan with injury and we badly need of striker where as for Chelsea they would go into negotiation table with Costa in their side though he might be flirting with A.Madrid the situation is not so desperate comparing to us.They aren't. Real now know they are desperate as well. They are losing Costa and have been blindsided by us for Lukaku. The price won't drop at all. Wouldn't surprise me if Perez didn't bring Hazard into the equation.
I think Chelsea are in a better position now that we're going for Lukaku. Despite Madrid's posturing they need to sell Morata and bring in Mbappe. in their minds he was going to United and they wanted to play chicken to get as much money as possible. Suddenly we've walked away and they need a buyer.
In mean time Real would have also understood that this would their last chance to sell Morata, who is unsettled so they wouldn't bother in getting down on their asking price.
This will backfire now and reflect very badly on their stance of rejecting our offer and denying morata his dream move. If they are willing to accept a lower fee then they should have accpeted our offer.
They don't have any choice now, sell him to Chelsea for the asking price.
Ofcourse he is he should have forced a move and handed in a trasnfer request when they rejected our last offer which was already inflated and more than decent , Perez is loosing grip on the transfer buisness acting like a real dimwit, on the other hand his ego never seems to amaze me when he does not realize he is dealing with the biggest and richest club in the world and keep acting like a smart ass which he is absolutely not.
Probably was trying to fund ronaldo's taxes with overinflated morata money.
When they sign 16 year old kids for 40 m the books are going to be heavyly loaded.
Would absolutely surprise me. Buying a (not even quite) top striker is such a huge investment nowadays that I can't imagine anyone buying two of them. Also, both players want to be the no.1 option at their club. I guess Lukaku's competition will be Rashford next season.Would there still not be a possibility for us to sign Morata as well? Lukaku can, unfortunately, go a bit AWOL during the big games, and can also dominate games where we shouldn't have drawn last season. Is there not a case for having both, considering are potentially losing Rooney (still a striker) and Ibra? Even when we had those two, we were goal-shy.
Perhaps, this is our way to pressure RM to not play games with us regarding his fee, now that Morata's relationship with the club has been soured somewhat.
No issue if you guys disagree, I just think we still can't expect our current stock + Lukaku (with Mourinho's magic Drogba wand) to suddenly start banging in all the goals we need.
Would absolutely surprise me. Buying a (not even quite) top striker is such a huge investment nowadays that I can't imagine anyone buying two of them. Also, both players want to be the no.1 option at their club. I guess Lukaku's competition will be Rashford next season.
She didn't. It was more bullshit from the media.Only person I feel sorry for is his wife for having her honeymoon cut short.
Yeah, it's a risk, but one that's inavoidable imo. (I'm one of those who aren't too convinced of Lukaku, btw.) The scarcity and expensiveness of up-and-coming top strikers means that each top club can pick one prospect at best and just has to hope it works.Understandable, I just think we are so light in the goals department that Lukaku is a risk. That said, buying a million strikers isn't the correct answer either. I just think we need options, and that's something we are lacking at the moment.
Up front, as it stands we have Lukaku and Rashford. If one of them gets injured then we are stuck with playing Martial out of position. We need depth, and depth that can guarantee goals. Have a look at a lot of the club's subs list (as well as ours historically) and you will always see someone there who can come on and bag some goals if required.
Right now? I'm not so sure. I'm not saying we need to be like Real and have a bunch of galactico's sitting on the bench, but if we are to aim for bigger things, we need to start thinking bigger.
Agree. Feel for Morata if he really wanted the move wich it seemed like he did.Madrid's asking price for a bench warmer was obviously preposterous. It's not like we low balled them, we were offering over 60m pounds. That's a shit ton for a serial substitute. From Utds perspective, Morata has a lot of fine qualities and I was excited for his transfer, even if we hugely over paid, but he was still a risky transfer because he remains relatively unproven. He's never consistently led the line for any club at any point of his career.
I'd still welcome him here, but I'm happy we made the choice we did.
I'm sorry, Jive did not keep Morata on the bench so they could fool Madrid into not buying him back.Yes, the reason he started so few games for Juve was that he was 21 when he joined, and wasn't meant to be a starter. He impressed them, though, so the following season they used him conservatively, hoping to keep Madrid from using their buy-back (Juve tried to buy out the buy-back for a reason).
For Madrid this season in the league (which is what it seems like you're referring to), he scored 15 goals and assisted 5 in 26 appearances (or 1341 minutes, which translates to a goal roughly every 67 minutes). 14 of those were starts. 11 of his goals and 3 of his assists came in those 14 starts.
Yeah, it's a risk, but one that's inavoidable imo. (I'm one of those who aren't too convinced of Lukaku, btw.) The scarcity and expensiveness of up-and-coming top strikers means that each top club can pick one prospect at best and just has to hope it works.
A third no.9 might be in Mourinho's plans, but if so, I'd rather expect him to be of Chicharito/Llorente calibre.
He needs to hire Raiola.
Hopefully then a chair hits Senor Perez.
Pretty muchThe media are blowing it out of proportion because it totally blew up in their faces, after weeks of telling us it would 'be done in the next 48 hours'. A nice attempt at diverting from the fact that they were completely clueless.
When was he meant to get married then? During the season?If he organised his wedding better he could have left silly season free to sort his fecking life out hey. But this cnut decided to get married and feck off on a honeymoon!
I bet he didn't realise how quickly married life takes control of your life. I have zero sympathy!
Why not?When was he meant to get married then? During the season?
Only person I feel sorry for is his wife for having her honeymoon cut short.
Why? She'll do piss all for the other 51 weeks of the year, who cares.Only person I feel sorry for is his wife for having her honeymoon cut short.
Why? She'll do piss all for the other 51 weeks of the year, who cares.
They did play him less cos of the uncertainty of Madrid triggering the buyback clause. Juve were not interested in grooming him for Madrid. The uncertainty affected the player as well.I'm sorry, Jive did not keep Morata on the bench so they could fool Madrid into not buying him back.
That's fecking ridiculous.
Totally agree. Morata is a better footballer and more what we need. If Chelsea get him, he will be the better signing. Hope I'm wrong but just don't see it.
If Lukaku gets injured we are pretty much fecked if we only have Rashford and Martial as we cant depend on them.Really think we should go for him as well and play two upfront. We'd have Rashford, Martial, Lukaku and Morata. The first two can also cover wide to get more game time.
We havent signed any of them yet though,so you'd never know.This is finished with.
United wouldn't have briefed everyone today (including the BBC) that we've ended our interest in Morata if there was still a chance we could sign him.
The ship has sailed. It wouldn't make sense to sign both anyway. If both were to start up front, the likes of Martial, Rashford, Mkhitaryan, Mata, Pogba would have to operate in a 4 man midfield, which they would be totally unsuited to.
I would say something if either Morata or Lukaku were adept to playing as wide forwards, but they're clearly central players.
Yeah, hard to feel sorry for the new wife of a 24 year old millionaire.Why? She'll do piss all for the other 51 weeks of the year, who cares.