Downing to Liverpool?

alastair

ignorant
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,310
Location
The Champions League
We're getting Mata if one of Nasri of Cesc leaves. Downing is fecking shite and is right up Liverpool's street with regards to recent transfer policy.
Wenger must think hell will freeze over if he spends more than £15m on one individual, which is why Mata(and Benzema for that matter) are placed firmly in my 'unlikely' file.
 

RDCR07

Not a bad guy (Whale Killer)
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
30,444
Location
Transfer Forum
I am surprised Arsenal are still linked with another winger when they need to replace at least one or maybe even two central midfielders.
 

Team Brian GB

Baby Cameron loves X-Factor
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
16,249
Supports
Chelsea
Can someone tell me what Downing has actually done at Villa?
 

alastair

ignorant
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,310
Location
The Champions League
I am surprised Arsenal are still linked with another winger when they need to replace at least one or maybe even two central midfielders.
That's part of it. The other part is the Stuart Downing part. I'm of the view-point that if we want to sign a top quality winger, let's go for it. It's not going to hurt. But Downing? That would lead me to self harm.
 

O'Sheady

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2003
Messages
557
Location
In the shead
Woeful article - if anyone really believes we could go into a season playing a flat 4-4-2 with two out and out wingers and two centre-forwards, they're completely deluded.
Why because you have been so sucessful with the system you have been using? Plus the player who made that system tick will be gone, it is reasonble to think you will at least be looking for a plan b.
 

alastair

ignorant
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,310
Location
The Champions League
Why because you have been so sucessful with the system you have been using? Plus the player who made that system tick will be gone, it is reasonble to think you will at least be looking for a plan b.
Indeed, but not that. If Cesc leaves, I'm still pretty sure it'll be a semblance of 3 in the centre of midfield, if only because it's a tall order to ask Wilshere at 19 to play in a 2.
 

Sam

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
31,585
You tried it in the CL final and are still recovering.
We also won the League by 9 points and finished 12 points ahead of your lot.

Nice try though. File under the section 'Must try harder' ;)
 

alastair

ignorant
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,310
Location
The Champions League
We also won the League by 9 points and finished 12 points ahead of your lot.

Nice try though. File under the section 'Must try harder' ;)
I never denied that. The point is that you play 4-4-2 very rarely, and when you have played it, it hasn't worked. Which is why you use it sparingly.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,875
I never denied that. The point is that you play 4-4-2 very rarely, and when you have played it, it hasn't worked. Which is why you use it sparingly.
If we played 442 in the final then we played 442 pretty much the entire season.
 

Sam

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
31,585
I never denied that. The point is that you play 4-4-2 very rarely, and when you have played it, it hasn't worked. Which is why you use it sparingly.
Like when we played it 3 times in a row vs Chelsea and won every single time? Or when we won a CL Semi Final using it?

I'm not saying we use it every single game, we clearly don't. But we do on occasion, and despite your claims, it has quite clearly worked.
 

alastair

ignorant
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,310
Location
The Champions League
If we played 442 in the final then we played 442 pretty much the entire season.
I really don't want to get into a discussion which I know I shall 'lose' because you'll post some stats and chalkboards of player footprints to prove that it was a 4-2-3-1 as opposed to 4-4-2.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,875
I really don't want to get into a discussion which I know I shall 'lose' because you'll post some stats and chalkboards of player footprints to prove that it was a 4-2-3-1 as opposed to 4-4-2.
That's why I didn't take issue with the fact you called it a 442, if that's what you interpret as a 442 then fair enough...but it's the same formation we've played all season?
 

O'Sheady

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2003
Messages
557
Location
In the shead
Focusing on the 442 aspect of that article is missing the point. You may lose two of your best ball players now,with them you have won nothing playing the way you have been. Any players you bring in will likely be a step down in the passing department (for the moment, Wenger will likely bring in some future stars who could blossom) so you might want to bring in somebody who can cross the ball. It works for us.