I do agree with your suggestion of Ten Hag and him taking time to implement his system and it may well be worth it for the long term despite him not yet being proven managing a massive club like United. The problem with Ten Hag and the current squad for me is let's say Ten Hag does take 2-3 seasons to implement his style, we'll also need a good amount invested in new players as the majority of our team are ready to win now, the core of our team, Maguire (28), Varane (28), Pogba (28), Bruno (27), Fred (28) are very much in the prime of their careers now, convincing them to go through another rebuild stage will be a bit of a long shot. I'm not saying I wouldn't recruit Ten Hag but from the boards perspective you can understand why they'd have reservations considering the amount invested in these players. Now, if we could look back in retrospect it would have been better to have gone for a Ten Hag type manager after Mourinho as to completely rip up the fundamentals of the team and start from scratch. However, us going for Ten Hag and going through another rebuild/implementing a system stage will basically show our boards incompetence and the fact that we wasted 450m worth of funds and 3 years with a subpar manager.
I, personally am torn between the two. But, I'm leaning more to Conte just for the fact that I don't want the last 3 years of squad building and investment to go to complete waste.
Yeah good points, but I feel a bit of sunken cost fallacy. I mean, we overpaid for Maguire. So there is no chance whatsoever that he could somehow turn it around (never sounds too mean, make it very unlikely). Varane just joined the club, he signed and won't leave the club would the project change. Pogba is out of contract and is demanding supposedly 400k per week. Are we really wanting to pay him that? Is the question who the manager is a factor in answering that question? And since when is Fred brought up when talking about the leading figures in our squad?
So all in all, I totally get your point, I could certainly live with Conte and I think, he could achieve great things. But, like so often in the last years, it appears to me as the easiest choice. The most obvious choice. It brought us LVG, Mourinho, Pogba, Ole permanent, Maguire, AWB, Sancho, Ronaldo. All those moves seemed so easy at the time. As if the resonsible figures at the club were happy that public opinion could be used as a reason to do something. This doesn't resonate to me - for me life is balance and you have to suffer when making bad decisions and you will get rewarded for hard ones. Costly ones. And Conte seems to be too easy for us now. A new dawn, a new figure we could put at the front of the ship, leading the course. I'd like United to start some sort of Bayern approach, get stronger in the club department, increase influence of technical director and so one, introduce the coach as a vital cog within a machine, which wouldn't stop even fully if the cog gets exchanged.
I don't know, interesting times though, lets see what happens. I am definitely curious.
Let's see, compared to the other options -
- The Ajax manager - unproven elsewhere
- Rodgers - will play better than Ole, but he's not exactly one you go for trophies
- Howe - same as above, arguable credentials for managing a superstar squad
- Zidane - doesn't seem to be interested at all.
Among these options, Conte is a no brainer. He's won the PL already. With Pep at City and Klopp at Liverpool. He's won the league with 3 different clubs.
Defensively solid, which is currently our main problem.
I would absolutely bet on Conte over all these options against the likes of Pep and Klopp. Newcastle are not relevant cause they won't be anywhere close to top4 in the next 2-3 seasons.
Last year, we have been relatively solid. This year we are without Varane in the worst games and we are really out of form, maybe due to trying to bed in new players. So even if I agree, we have to make sure to be way more solid than we are right now, the main problem for 5 years isn't defense. It is chance creation.