Desert Eagle
Punjabi Dude
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2006
- Messages
- 18,369
Means feck all. Even 3 runners up medals would mean feck all.Three Cup semi-finals, and achieving the primary aim(CL) is just an average season, wow just wow
Means feck all. Even 3 runners up medals would mean feck all.Three Cup semi-finals, and achieving the primary aim(CL) is just an average season, wow just wow
For Man Utd it's an average season. We used to make fun of Arsenal for celebrating making top 4 every year. Making the EL semifinal by beating Copenhagen to get there and getting knocked out by Sevilla is no great achievement. 3rd is decent for a rebuild process, but we also finished 33 points behind the leaders. Beating City has been a highlight though.
If you factor in that the path to the Europa semi final was devoid of quality opponents, and that we finished nearer in points to the relegation zone than 1st place, you may well say it was an average season. I actually think it went from absolutely woeful, to shite, to more promising, to knackered. Our points tally is nothing to say anything positive about, nor our goals tally. Our performances didn't really befit a United team until Bruno was signed late January. Yes, average season with plenty of room for improvement next season, which is needed.
Means feck all. Even 3 runners up medals would mean feck all.
Yeah okay Mr Angry.
Yeah, because we are are talking about someone who has been the best in his job for over a decade!Ah right, I forgot. Anyone who thinks that someone outside of United is good isn't a real United fan. Do you think Messi is good or are you a United fan?
Yeah, because we are are talking about someone who has been the best in his job for over a decade!
You can't be suggesting that Poch is the managerial equivalent of Messi, because even his biggest fan bois aren't that fecking deluded.
He is brilliant coach but not what we need now. We have so many young players who need managers/coach who trust them and improve their game. Conte is more about getting experienced players to get the job done. He is too volatile.
I'm not. But using Rob Corona's logic, we should all go support Messi and "turn our backs on United completely" if we think he's that good and wanted to sign him.
I'm just pointing out that thinking "that guy that isn't at United would be an improvement if he came to United" doesn't mean you're a fake fan. Plenty of OGS defenders here use stupid arguments like that and throw a fit when they get called out on it.
Who's throwing fits?
If you're Ole out you're in the minority and if your choice of replacement isn't a proven winner then expect kick back.
Its a strange time to be calling for a managerial replacement.
I think there's a lot of people in here who don't quite understand how important understanding your employer's culture has more weight than a CV or achievements. Pochettino is undoubtedly a good manager but he'd never succeed at a club like United, neither would Nagelsmaan
Total nonsense. Why wouldn't they? And what is this culture that neither would understand?
I'm fine with kickback. It's just the couple of times I've responded to the arguments from those rubbishing Poch, they just say "deluded" and don't bother explaining themselves. The arguments most of them use seem pretty obviously weak but they ignore it and just insult whoever disagrees with them.
Also, I don't think being in the minority means your opinion should automatically get dismissed. It's likely on a fan forum, but it makes the people who do it look daft.
Means feck all. Even 3 runners up medals would mean feck all.
I responded to the post you were called deluded for and explained why I didn't think the point you were making made much sense.
To be fair to other poster he'd given up at that stage as it seemed you were moving goalposts to make out Poch coming third, in what had been a two horse race, was some kind of achievement.
I don't think it was moving goalposts. I explained why just limiting it to a two horse race was silly. It was only a two horse race because Spurs were better than everyone else other then Leicester. You can't just rule out every team Spurs was better than and say "well, they finished behind Leicester so that's rubbish".
I'm really loathe to continue talking about Poch but isn't that criticism based on the fact that they had a good team who were playing well and were well in the title race until April/May when they collapsed?
They'd battered us and Stoke and then got 2 pts from their final 12 available and ended up in third.
I don't think it's really fair to frame that argument as nonsensical on the basis that 19 teams didn't win the title just like every other year.
That's the point I was calling you out on.
You're mischaracterising the argument and reducing it to simplistic nonsense.
EDIT:
What I said to you originally is this:
Your retort, that it would mean every other manager failed because they didn't win the league, doesn't really hold water anyway as United and City changed their manager after that season and Liverpool and Chelsea fired theirs before Christmas.
I don't remember your post actually.
Anyway, I disagree that I was reducing it. The point that poster made was already simple. I couldn't reduce it more if I tried.
But again, you could also point out that that good team that was playing well has to reflect well on Poch to some extent and the fact that, despite a poor end to the season, they still got one of the club's best results in the league. People who criticise Poch's record on here cherry pick the negatives (finishing behind Leicester and Arsenal one year, bad end to that season) and ignore the positives (finishing ahead of everyone else, being well ahead of everyone else for the vast majority of that season). It's similar to how some pundits have criticised OGS by saying Chelsea, Arsenal and Spurs have had issues so finishing ahead of them somehow doesn't count.
There is a reason that Poch wasn't sacked after that season. Because everyone (outside of United fans looking back on this season in 2020 trying to defend OGS) could see that he had done a good job. Maybe the vast majority of pundits, non-United fans and journalists who seem to rate Poch highly (or at least higher than OGS) are all wrong and united fans trying to defend Ole are right about his main competitor for the job and we should all shut up and root for Ole or go support Poch instead but I doubt it.
Under Poch, Spurs finished higher in the league then they did before, went further in the CL then they did before and consistently competed with teams spending much more then them. That's a good performance.
Lost 3 semifinals in one season, two of which we are favourites. He should be sacked for just that alone. Such a weak manager. Let's put it this way. He would never be on the shortlist for any top 7 clubs in England if they are looking for a new manager never mind an elite club. We should have just let him go end of the season and signed Pochettino.
Lost 3 semifinals in one season, two of which we are favourites. He should be sacked for just that alone. Such a weak manager. Let's put it this way. He would never be on the shortlist for any top 7 clubs in England if they are looking for a new manager never mind an elite club. We should have just let him go end of the season and signed Pochettino.
If you look at our net spend following seasons we made CL vs missed, its significantly higher when we fail to qualify. That shows you the Glazers/board care about the revenue and sponsorship implications (addias deal) of making top 4. That's it. The Glazers and Ed especially with his background are businessmen FIRST, second and third. The ambition to win falls on the manager and players. It was always like that even during SAF. But SAF was a serial winner who was OBSESSED with winning so it wasn't as obvious.Whatever my opinion on OGS, if our board fail to give him at least 2 decent signings, it pretty much means our ambition is top 4. So unless he's a miracle worker, OGS ain't winning no league with us but this would be the case for any other decent manager.
The combination of reluctance to spend and absolutely clueless transfer business means we don't stand a chance as a club. Liverpool also have greedy owners but at least they've made sure their structure allows them to make money and keep the club successful.
You dont seem to grasp the connection between a rebuild and culture (going back to our roots)That's another thing some people say. I don't think the culture at United is so unique a top manager wouldn't understand it. Liverpool have a unique culture and Klopp has no connection to it. Pep had no connection to Bayern. Was Alex Ferguson an ex player at United? Had Mourinho been at Inter before winning a treble? They all did alright. Football is football. A good football manager is a good football manager regardless of what some teams wearing a similar shirt did at the same stadium a decade ago. Some managers may suit some teams (not clubs) slightly more because of their playstyle but that's it.
All fans like to imagine that their club is some unique snowflake that only a select few can understand but it's no different from how all parents think that their child is more special than most.
Such a terrible manager. Has no vision for the club and no players would ever want to play for a PE teacher. Sack him now!!!!!!
Ole signs player shortlisted by Real Madrid.
they are still lurking, polluting this forum with their moan and hate. Today is not a good day for themWhy would anyone sack ole at this point? His signings look good, he has clubs interest at heart, red through and through. Players love him. Fans love him. He needs time and proper backing.
Close this god-awful thread, never right from the start and now it’s just plain stupid!
You dont seem to grasp the connection between a rebuild and culture (going back to our roots)
If you are going to use Klopp as an example, and I think you should. Look at the time he needed to reset and build his team. It was the same for Pep, although he took over a winning team and got backed insanely. If you can’t recognise how far Utd have drifted from their identity and culture, I am not surprised you don’t recognise the job that needs to be done. Right now the job isn’t being backed, unless you think Ole should turn Lingard into Messi. You might want to focus on the peices in that puzzle instead. But then again, reading through your posts I don’t think you are a Utd supporter at all, but a whum.
I'm aware that questioning the manager means you're somehow not a "real" supporter in some people's eyes but seeing as that's a stupid idea, I don't care.
Obviously the better the team he builds will result in an increase in our expectations but right now, right this second we should all be happy with the direction we’re heading.
It’s fine to question a manager but if anyone questions him now while he’s doing a fine job of building the best team we’ve had since fergie left then they need their head checking.
Obviously the better the team he builds will result in an increase in our expectations but right now, right this second we should all be happy with the direction we’re heading.
The improvements are all over the pitch now. I was sceptical at first but Ole is doing a good job.
I'm not happy because (1) I don't think Woodward is genuine about paying for a title winning squad and (b) it would be a waste of money anyway without a world class coach capable of playing a team in a modern formation. I might be wrong of course. But I don't see any reason at all to think so.
So Sancho and a CB should I be expecting top3 or do I have to wait another season for my expectations to be a title challenge and I can truly judge him then?
Disclaimer* Only if we get the transfers we require for next summer too.
What is a 'modern formation'?I'm not happy because (1) I don't think Woodward is genuine about paying for a title winning squad and (b) it would be a waste of money anyway without a world class coach capable of playing a team in a modern formation. I might be wrong of course. But I don't see any reason at all to think so.