UNITED ACADEMY
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2018
- Messages
- 13,127
- Supports
- Erik ten Hag
Ok, here goes.
Do I think that, with the newly added timeframe, Ole inherited less original players (ignoring the quality of those players) then Conte inherited at Chelsea? Yes. That is factual albeit
I asked simple yes or no question and you still couldn't answer it. So let me repeat the question again, were Valencia, Fellaini, Herrera, Smalling, Sanchez, Lukaku here last season?
Do you accept you were wrong with regards to the original timeline (that took you about 8 post to add in) of Ole inheriting them ?
What original timeline? You can't be serious comparing a manager who took in charged mid season as caretaker to manager who had full season, if that's the case that would be the most stupid argument & comparison I have ever read.
The very first post that you replied I have been talking about 19/20 season and you compared it to Conte, remember this (the quote below):
You don’t be 6th and jump to league title right away. You make progress every season. First full season expectation is to make it top 4, second full season is to close the gaps between United and Liverpool, third full season is to challenge the league and finally winning it. We want high standard because this is big club but it’s unrealistic to fix 6 years problem within 1-2 years.
Do you accept I was correct that Conte and Ole are more similar stylistically to Conte and Jose?
First of all, why is it relevant to our original discussion? (been asking this for 3x already and I didn't get the answer from you).
Second, No and it's debatable like what you said, remember this is you:
Debateable how different his style is.
This is what I was trying to explain to the other poster but, for some reason, the idea of Ole being in any way pragmatic seemed to deeply offend him. I see him as defense first for the reasons you say, we are a reactive team and that's no bad thing when we are definitely at our best in transition and on the counter but rarely will we set out to dominate possession in attacking areas and impose ourselves on another team, unless it's one of the bottom teams in the league where the quality difference is so high.
I remember a quote from Ben Davies (I think) in the Spurs doc and he said the biggest difference with Jose coming in compared to Poch was there was so much more detail on opposition, how to stop certain players and how to setup up game to game. Ole is not that extreme but his setup is actually very similar when you look at players positions when out of possession.
It's all about finding a balance in the PL, Guardiola has definitely become less of a purist, Klopp went from winning nothing to winning everything after signing a specialist DM & GK, Chelsea won the league with Conte, Leicester with Ranieri, it's clear you can't go full Keegan and expect to win trophies.
@The Boy was spot on there. The way how you explained it was too simplistic to describe him as a defense manager. He was also correct about Ole that Ole is type reactive or I called it flexible manager. Summary stats what you provided doesn't conclude of Ole's style at all because he's changing his set up almost every games to suit the opposition team. Conte & Jose had their own style and set up and they stick with it unlike Ole. You wouldn't expect such open game like last Sunday from Jose against Leeds. Ole is less complex, give freedom to his players more for fluidity and always set up differently almost every games.
Last edited: