Rednotdead
New Member
The time to judge is one minute after the window closes on 1st Sept. Then we'll know what deals have been done and whether he's up to the job or not. He will know that himself.
Van Gaal out?
Ok. Fergie off the board?What VG has to do with it? He hasn't even started his job yet.
Ok. Fergie off the board?
Fella walked in a pub, he says, "Eight brandies, please." He's knocked the eight brandies back and says, "I shouldn't be drinking like this with what I've got." Barmaid says, "What you got?" He says, "feck all."The person responsible for transfers is Woody
And who suffers at the end of the day ? The truth of the matter is if we had finished in the top three then we'd most likely have made a lot more money than we'd have spent if you consider that lower placed teams made more money than we made for winning the league last season . Why would the club ignore players like Strootman and then end up spending double that in signing Fellaini if their intention was to spend as little as possible ? Why sign a player like Mata for our record fee ? Imo it's the football side that is letting us down in these situations because there are the ones that are supposed yo point out to Woodward those type of targets . Woodward is our negotiator not our scout and there is a limit to what he can do to get a deal done, he can't exactly force Southampton to accept our bid and Shaw to agree to our terms in the desired time can he ?I have always said that building a strong squad does not require world class players at every position. You buy a better player than you currently have at a certain position. That should be the mindset for every transfer window. There is no need to be shooting for the stars.
Maybe the club does this on purpose knowing they can make bids that are sure to be rejected, and at the same time, pretend like they were trying to sign players,when in reality, they had no intentions in doing so. I guess that would be the cynical point of view on the issue.
And who suffers at the end of the day ? The truth of the matter is if we had finished in the top three then we'd most likely have made a lot more money than we'd have spent if you consider that lower placed teams made more money than we made for winning the league last season . Why would the club ignore players like Strootman and then end up spending double that in signing Fellaini if their intention was to spend as little as possible ? Why sign a player like Mata for our record fee ? Imo it's the football side that is letting us down in these situations because there are the ones that are supposed yo point out to Woodward those type of targets . Woodward is our negotiator not our scout and there is a limit to what he can do to get a deal done, he can't exactly force Southampton to accept our bid and Shaw to agree to our terms in the desired time can he ?
So when were all our transfer targets leaked under them?
But who are the players we want? I refuse to believe our transfer list included players like Hummels, Reus and Fabegas.This. Seems like people are expecting miracles from the man - we will get the players we need this time.
But who are the players we want? I refuse to believe our transfer list included players like Hummels, Reus and Fabegas.
But who are the players we want? I refuse to believe our transfer list included players like Hummels, Reus and Fabegas.
Well with the amount that gets leaked from the club these days I wouldn't be surprised if it really did include unrealistic big names.We don't know yet.
My worry is we're only linked with big names, Van Gaal is a man known to build within rather than spend so we never know but if we don't sign anyone before the world cup concerns will kick in, players prices will rise and they'll know we are desperate to sign someone and will inflate their price even more like what happened last summer.I don't think that either, but I do think that van Gaal has decided who we are going after - and that there are different processes going on. We don't really need to know until it is done, even though it is boring to wait
Well my point was that transfers aren't as clear cut as they may appear to be. Kroos just yesterday said that he didn't ever consider us as an option at all. And we were led to believe it's a done deal?I never said the 30 million was for Hummels. I said 30 would be available for the position. As for Bayern telling me to piss off, 40 is just the starting point of negotiations. Remember these bids are based on the assumption that I would really want these players and would do everything possible to sign them. I wouldn't really want to pay 40 for Kroos. I don't even like him that much. I also do not like Fabregas and I wouldn't even bid for him.
To tell you the truth I don't even like the list of players(except for Shaw) that have been mentioned in the papers.
Really? Not only do we need two top quality CM's, we need a consistent and reliable CB and Winger.Should give it time our new manager is hardly in the door and not like there has been a plethora of deals elsewhere. To much hyperbole and drama these days. Our squad is good enough for a top 4 place as it is, when we buy hopefully that will take us into contention to challenge again. Wold be great to get 4-5 players in bu in reality we probably only need 1 or 2 to challenge.
And LB, if people think Evra is should be the main man in that position they've got another thing coming.Really? Not only do we need two top quality CM's, we need a consistent and reliable CB and Winger.
Ahhh forgot LB, although Shaw isn't world class his potential is there.And LB, if people think Evra is should be the main man in that position they've got another thing coming.
My personal view on him is that he's obviously a very smart man and very good businessman. He's currently learning how to play the transfer game and I think when he gets it right he'll be worth sticking by.
All probably true. Only problem is you'd think a club like us would be able to get someone in who already knows how to play the transfer game.
The time to judge is one minute after the window closes on 1st Sept. Then we'll know what deals have been done and whether he's up to the job or not. He will know that himself.
This. Seems like people are expecting miracles from the man - we will get the players we need this time.
This, basically. All within two weeks of the season ending the following has happened: we've hired a popular new manager and fan favourite as assistant manager, signed another fan favourite on a new contract and bid an exceptional amount of money for the best 18 year old defender in the game.
What, exactly, has gone so wrong? If things go tits up this Summer I'll be the first to hammer him come September, but unlike last season, I can't be arsed with getting angry each and every day. What will be will be.
This, basically. All within two weeks of the season ending the following has happened: we've hired a popular new manager and fan favourite as assistant manager, signed another fan favourite on a new contract and bid an exceptional amount of money for the best 18 year old defender in the game.
What, exactly, has gone so wrong? If things go tits up this Summer I'll be the first to hammer him come September, but unlike last season, I can't be arsed with getting angry each and every day. What will be will be.
I can't understand people who defend Woodward so much when they know so little about what exactly is prime directive is with regards to transfers.
Woodward, unlike gill, is a glazer man through and through. He could easily , let's say, fly home from Australia to make it look like he's gonna try and sign a big world star and just goto the Barcelona museum.
Or he could let's say bid on a player, refuse to budge on an offer and then leak to the press that it was imposters not acting on behalf of the club. Or he could just put stupid bids in for players to make it look like the club is ambitious in its transfer dealings...
Or he might just have very little to do if the united manager has a generic 30million budget to spend. The papers can do all the promotion on how big the club is in stature and how many players we are going to sign. If we don't sign players, the manager seems to get the blame and the club owners seem to get away with any ridicule by some of the more moronic fans who somehow think a selective three year period of decent spending proves they are not a problem!!
If you talk big, like our clubs pr machine likes to, you have to deliver..
Most people believe that the clubs prime targets would be gotten before the World Cup. Even on a basic maths level, if any of our targets have a good World Cup their value will increase and given our owners love of keeping profits, I don't think they want to be forking out more for the same player in July!
People are expecting a little too much. Granted, last year we did some silly things and that's partly on Woodward. But it's hardly as if Gill got every deal we wanted. Nor can you do it quickly if the other sides are taking their time.
It's about doing things wisely and in a proper way, that's all we can ask. Hopefully it will get us the right deals. Sometimes it won't. No club gets everyone they want, whenever they want it. Even Real Madrid.
@Drummer, the 37m we've spent on Mata is just about the sort of money we're losing because of the lack of CL football next season. Do you really think the Glazers approved the deal just so we don't miss out on that?
I believe there's good money to spend. I don't believe for one minute the 150-200m pounds reports, that's ridiculous. But I also don't believe United being an Arsenal is the sort of branding the Glazers want for us - if only from a business perspective.
This might well be our intention but there isn't much Woodward can do if clubs decide to hold onto their players in the hope that their price might rise after the WC. What more would you like him to do in Shaw's case for example? He's made a big bid which allegedly involves big wages for an 18 year old.If you talk big, like our clubs pr machine likes to, you have to deliver..
Most people believe that the clubs prime targets would be gotten before the World Cup. Even on a basic maths level, if any of our targets have a good World Cup their value will increase and given our owners love of keeping profits, I don't think they want to be forking out more for the same player in July!
"Most" people didn't believe that at all. Woodward does nothing but brief big, and yes it's immensely irritating, but I'm going to give him more than two weeks before I dig the grave. Of course, those who have done nothing but preach about time would do well to follow in similar fashion..
This might well be our intention but there isn't much Woodward can do if clubs decide to hold onto their players in the hope that their price might rise after the WC. What more would you like him to do in Shaw's case for example? He's made a big bid which allegedly involves big wages for an 18 year old.
Well my point was that transfers aren't as clear cut as they may appear to be. Kroos just yesterday said that he didn't ever consider us as an option at all. And we were led to believe it's a done deal?
Eh, Woodward has had over a year at this stage, why are you judging him only on last two weeks?.
Bearing in mind that moyes isn't around to take the blame anymore for Woodwards shortfalls....
But it's hardly as if Gill got every deal we wanted. Nor can you do it quickly if the other sides are taking their time.