Have any of his sponsors commented on the allegations, or withdrawn sponsorship yet? A lot of them do even when it's only at the allegations stage.
I don’t know. I’ve only seen the documents after they were translated since those were the only ones they showed so I can’t comment on how they were translated or if they lost any of the context in doing so.
The documents everyone is using to believe he’s guilty are illegally obtained documents with no verification of them actually existing and it’s a translated version of them. They also have statements that directly contradict eachother.
It will degrade his image and he might even lose some sponsors over it but there’s no chance he actually gets convicted or the public actually finds out if anything happened. Just like after all the other Spiegel articles before this one.
There's a chance he gets convicted in a civil court in absentia I think. Perhaps @jojojo has better insight?
If he does it will be pretty big.
Ronaldo was asked about the subject and answered that it was fake news and there were people (the journalists) trying to make money from his name.
This is what the journalist took out of that statement.
Complete lie. Ronaldo didn’t talk about the woman at all. Not sure if it’s scarier that he’s lying on purpose or that he’s not able to get the obvious context out of a simple statement given they were the ones who apparently translated the documents.
@Classical Mechanic with the evidence that’s been presented by Spiegel and the documents that would have any consideration in court, there’s no chance he gets convicted. I’m guessing it’s entirely possible there’s more to it than that though. The only thing to do now is wait and see what happens given we don’t really know what’s true or not.
I think Spiegel getting sued for publishing illegally obtained documents that themselves admit were statements said by Ronaldo to his lawyer in confidence is pretty much a certainty though. Unless I’ve missed something and that’s somehow legal.
Don't some countries allow that sort of thing if it's deemed to be in the public interest? Spiegel could probably make a strong argument for that being the case here.
Potential for an OJ-esque trial?
Have any of his sponsors commented on the allegations, or withdrawn sponsorship yet? A lot of them do even when it's only at the allegations stage.
Derschowitz is available.
I give it about a week before Avenatti or Gloria Allred is all over this case.
I think that would happen only if he is convicted. And quite frankly, that would be his biggest fear as there is little chance of prison for someone as famous and influential as him (assuming he's guilty).
He's built up the CR7 brand to remain relevant once he retires, but this has the potential to escalate and ruin his brand ala Tiger Woods.
Derschowitz is available.
Potential for an OJ-esque trial?
I don't really see this becoming a bigger story though. Reckon it'll die off.
What's she claiming... Another 200k... Might see him pay her off and another NDA? Probably more cost effective than loosing a sponsor or two
I doubt we’re going to see anything other than a civil trial, at the most. That doesn’t really have the same pizzazz as a criminal trial would have.
What's she claiming... Another 200k... Might see him pay her off and another NDA? Probably more cost effective than loosing a sponsor or two
'Disheartened' is a curious choice of word tbh. Surely 'concerned' would be more appropriate.
It's a blandism, that's for sure, but I've read dozens of press releases and RNS nearly every day for nigh on 18 years. That word seldom crops up.Disheartened is a place holder term that can be conveniently up or downgraded based on subsequent news of the case.
If that court document is legitimate, it’s damning. If she truly said no numerous times and he nonetheless sodomised her, then he’s a bastard and deserves the comeuppance.As much as I admire the guy, the fact that a $375,000 payment was made to keep quiet with the allegations is very telling.
Something has happened, I'm in no place to say what has happened though, but if it goes to court etc, he should be held accountable like any other person and be punished to the full extent of the law. Celebrity status has no place in alleviating sentences, I hate that.
Agree.If that court document is legitimate, it’s damning. If she truly said no numerous times and he nonetheless sodomised her, then he’s a bastard and deserves the comeuppance.
If that court document is legitimate, it’s damning. If she truly said no numerous times and he nonetheless sodomised her, then he’s a bastard and deserves the comeuppance.
Some incredibly weird people in this thread reading back on it and it's no surprise that as a society females struggle to get justice for these incidents, based on peoples views in here and general thinking.
Some incredibly weird people in this thread reading back on it and it's no surprise that as a society females struggle to get justice for these incidents, based on peoples views in here and general thinking.
What actually happened here?
Girl & guy went home together, had sex, he pushed for anal, so offered it, but said ”no, stop” some times but didn’t just get off the bed and kept her ass in position so he ”pushed his luck” a bit too much?
Is that right? Or has he taken her to the room and pinned her down against her will and raped her? I can’t really make head nor tail of the information out there.
Who is to say she didn't try and get out of the anal position though?
Well in the quotes everyone is saying make him look guilty, doesn’t it also say ”she kept offering her ass”?
You can go from behind the normal way though. He seemed to have forced it into the wrong hole despite her saying no several times. I'm guessing she switched position just to go "doggy style"?
I'm just sick of the stuff in the media now, guys accused of things without evidence having their lives ruined. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply in a regressive left society. Punish people for provable crimes, protect their identity until there is actually any evidence. This US Judge case at the moment is a farce, absolutely not a shred of evidence yet he's being dragged through the whole circus. Did he do it? Maybe, but that means nothing without evidence.