Woman accuses Cristiano Ronaldo of rape - CR7 case only

Status
Not open for further replies.
Revenge from what? Genuine question.
 
Out of curiosity, is there anyone here who sided with Christine Ford over Brett Kavanaugh and now sides with Ronaldo over Kathryn Mayorga?
 
He looks like a disgusting, oily narcissist, so I’m not even remotely surprised. I hope this woman gets the justice she deserves.
 
Vato said:
:lol: wtf, this all happened before we signed him ffs.
Click to expand...
I think it hapened the day after you signed him.

Perez ploy from the start, this girl was his agent on Vegas to get dirt on Ronaldo so he could exert revenge in the future if he ever needed to. Now he left for Juve, pull the trigger.

Still don't understand "revenge" from what exactly, but makes perfect sense.
 
KirkDuyt said:
La Repubblica published it today apparently. Don't have link handy sorry.

This, him not winning best player, the red card, all part of a Perez' lead campaign.
Click to expand...
If it was La Repubblica it certainly wasn't direct quotes from him. At best someone linked with him or Gestifute. But conspiracy theories on Italian newspapers aren't nothing that special. Not saying what you said is false of course, only putting things into context.
 
SCP said:
If it was La Repubblica it certainly wasn't direct quotes from him. At best someone linked with him or Gestifute. But conspiracy theories on Italian newspapers aren't nothing that special. Not saying what you said is false of course, only putting things into context.
Click to expand...
Ah, yeah I have no clue, I just read it on a Dutch site that collects global headlines.
 
KirkDuyt said:
Ah, yeah I have no clue, I just read it on a Dutch site that collects global headlines.
Click to expand...
No problem next months the conspiracy theorists will flourish like mushrooms. From one side or another. Will stay away from this. Too sensitive to make jokes.
 
Would it not benefit both parties (the accused and the accusor) to keep their names private? Whatever happened and whatever the outcome, I can't see why this is made public.

Is there a good reason that I just can't think of?
 
duffer said:
Would it not benefit both parties (the accused and the accusor) to keep their names private? Whatever happened and whatever the outcome, I can't see why this is made public.

Is there a good reason that I just can't think of?
Click to expand...
keeping it private will only benefit Ronaldo, the woman needs the media in her side(if what she says is true). It's very difficult going against wealthy people without media helping you out.
 
duffer said:
Would it not benefit both parties (the accused and the accusor) to keep their names private? Whatever happened and whatever the outcome, I can't see why this is made public.

Is there a good reason that I just can't think of?
Click to expand...

The initial NDA leaked and the German publication was all over it for a while, asking her to comment. Chances are it would have leaked again once the case was re-opened as well. I don't think it's possible to keep such a high profile case private forever.

Also maybe, having it out in the open prevents Ronaldo's team from bullying her and trying to bury it. Spiegel have said they got an ex Vegas cop to try and do the same back when it happened.
 
duffer said:
Would it not benefit both parties (the accused and the accusor) to keep their names private? Whatever happened and whatever the outcome, I can't see why this is made public.

Is there a good reason that I just can't think of?
Click to expand...

In the times of Ffootball Leaks and globalization something like this can only stay under wraps for so long and while I don't condone hacking or making a public spectacle out of rape case in general, I do think that it's probably the lesser evil to have these things leaked than having everything swept under the carpet and kids potentially idolizing a rapist.
 
do.ob said:
In the times of Ffootball Leaks and globalization something like this can only stay under wraps for so long and while I don't condone hacking or making a public spectacle out of rape case in general, I do think that it's probably the lesser evil to have these things leaked than having everything swept under the carpet and kids potentially idolizing a rapist.
Click to expand...

I think woman who is accusing Ronaldo getting a shitload of hate from the millions of his fanboys is more important (than the public knowing about the accusation). Coming forward with these sort of allegations is hard enough without a huge spotlight.
 
duffer said:
I think woman who is accusing Ronaldo getting a shitload of hate from the millions of his fanboys is more important (than the public knowing about the accusation). Coming forward with these sort of allegations is hard enough without a huge spotlight.
Click to expand...

True, that's the other side of this particular coin and a legitimate concern.
 
duffer said:
I think woman who is accusing Ronaldo getting a shitload of hate from the millions of his fanboys is more important (than the public knowing about the accusation). Coming forward with these sort of allegations is hard enough without a huge spotlight.
Click to expand...

Possibly inevitable given the Nevada law case. Anonymity may not even be an option for her.
 
duffer said:
I think woman who is accusing Ronaldo getting a shitload of hate from the millions of his fanboys is more important (than the public knowing about the accusation). Coming forward with these sort of allegations is hard enough without a huge spotlight.
Click to expand...

Given how the rabid fans of a comparative small fry like Ched Evans managed to ruin a woman's life about four times over I dread to think how badly this one could end.
 
NinjaFletch said:
Given how the rabid fans of a comparative small fry like Ched Evans managed to ruin a woman's life about four times over I dread to think how badly this one could end.
Click to expand...

Wasn't his football career also totally screwed and wasn't he later deemed innocent or am I remembering it wrong? I get that siding the women in cases like these are the in thing to do but can you guys try to be more objective sometimes
 
fellaini's barber said:
Wasn't his football career also totally screwed and wasn't he later deemed innocent or am I remembering it wrong? I get that siding the women in cases like these are the in thing to do but can you guys try to be more objective sometimes
Click to expand...

You are indeed remembering it wrong. He later deemed "not guilty", meaning the jury weren't sure of his guilt. That isn't the same as being deemed innocent.

All of which has nothing to do with Ninjafletch's point either really.
 
fellaini's barber said:
Wasn't his football career also totally screwed and wasn't he later deemed innocent or am I remembering it wrong? I get that siding the women in cases like these are the in thing to do but can you guys try to be more objective sometimes
Click to expand...

Yeah, good job missing the point buddy. I was talking about the woman having her life ruined by the trail by rapid fans of him.

In this instance, I can think Evans was rightfully acquitted (despite his demonstrably atrocious actions on the night), and that the woman (who never even claimed to have been raped by Evans, but whose lack of memory of the event led the CPS to bring charges against Evans) at the centre of it did not deserve to be viciously attacked, doxxed, outed, forced into hiding, abused, and lied about.

If it happens to a woman who has legal anonymity, for whom people were prosecuted for naming, and for whom only claimed that she could not remember the night in question because a shit footballer who played in the Championship was involved I'm sure you can imagine why I'm concerned about the trouble a woman who has accused a man with literally millions of rabid fanboys and who has none of those protections.
 
sullydnl said:
You are indeed remembering it wrong. He later deemed "not guilty", meaning the jury weren't sure of his guilt. That isn't the same as being deemed innocent.

All of which has nothing to do with Ninjafletch's point either really.
Click to expand...

Point is, I find it ironic he's talking about the lady's life being ruined when the accused totally had his career fecked for life over something they actually couldn't find him guilty of as you mentioned
 
NinjaFletch said:
Yeah, good job missing the point buddy. I was talking about the woman having her life ruined by the trail by rapid fans of him.

In this instance, I can think Evans was rightfully acquitted (despite his demonstrably atrocious actions on the night), and that the woman (who never even claimed to have been raped by Evans, but whose lack of memory of the event led the CPS to bring charges against Evans) at the centre of it did not deserve to be viciously attacked, doxxed, outed, forced into hiding, abused, and lied about.

If it happens to a woman who has legal anonymity, for whom people were prosecuted for naming, and for whom only claimed that she could not remember the night in question because a shit footballer who played in the Championship was involved I'm sure you can imagine why I'm concerned about the trouble a woman who has accused a man with literally millions of rabid fanboys and who has none of those protections.
Click to expand...

Get your point now. Yeah the Evans 'fans' nonsense was a disgrace.
 
fallengt said:
Is he going to prison or all this just for another "settlement" ?
Click to expand...

For what I read in another pages, if there is a trial, as it is more than 4 years, he would not go to jail according nevada laws (someone correct me if I am wrong). It will be a civil trial, so money
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45817055

Ronaldo's lawyer is claiming the leaked documents were altered to include the damning quotes from Ronaldo:

"Although Cristiano Ronaldo is accustomed to media attention, inherent in the fact that he is a famous person, it is absolutely deplorable that the media continue to propagate and stimulate an intentional defamation campaign based on stolen and easily manipulated digital documents.

"Cristiano Ronaldo has mandated his lawyers in the United States and Europe to deal with all legal aspects and expresses full confidence that the truth will prevail, despite the corruption of counter-information, and in which the laws of Nevada will be enforced and respected."

The statement also claims documents allegedly containing statements by Ronaldo are "pure inventions".

He added: "So that there are no doubts: Cristiano Ronaldo vehemently denies all the accusations in this civil action, in consistency with what he has done in the last nine years.

"The documents that allegedly contain statements by Mr Ronaldo and were reproduced in the media are pure inventions.

"By 2015, dozens of entities (including law firms) in different parts of Europe were attacked and their electronic data stolen by a cyber criminal.

"This hacker tried to sell such information, and a media outlet irresponsibly ended up publishing some of the stolen documents, significant parts of which were altered and/or completely fabricated.

"Once again, for the avoidance of doubt, Cristiano Ronaldo's position has always been, and continues to be, that what happened in 2009 in Las Vegas was completely consensual."
Click to expand...

We'll see.
 
4bars said:
For what I read in another pages, if there is a trial, as it is more than 4 years, he would not go to jail according nevada laws (someone correct me if I am wrong). It will be a civil trial, so money
Click to expand...

The governor of nevada signed into law an extension to the statute. Its now 20 years, up from the 4 that you mentioned. It came about because of cosby and his history of raping women. So theres nothing to say ronny might not be looking at jail time if a criminal case is brought against him. I imagine theres an eager prosecutor looking to make a name for himself thats watching the civil case with an eagle eye.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.