Quit being so sensitive. If you know the truth do share.Some of the comments here absolutely beggars belief.
Quit being so sensitive. If you know the truth do share.
Surpreme court just dimissed one the sexual assault charge against Weinstein. Woman accusing him had so many inconsistencies in her story. Just because they're "victims" doesn't mean they'd tell you what happened exactly
Don't get me wrong Weinstein is a horrible person but until I see the clearer picture, I'm not gonna side with any one. Sorry for somewhat off topic but both cases are similar
Not gonna lie, seems like she ran out of the settlement money and is trying to get some more.
There is something off about this whole story. If it's fake, I hope she pays the price for trying to ruin a man's career and life to get more money.
If Ronaldo is really guilty, doesn't even matter if it was 9y ago, he should get properly punished as well.
Unless she wins the case (if there is a case), I'm pretty sure her life will be ruined anyway.
Dancing and kissing on a dancefloor doesn't mean consent to sex is given, and even in the event consent to sex is initially given, that consent can be relinquished at any time (by both parties) and therefore even sexual activity does not constitute consent. And that's not mentioning if the woman is in such a (drunken) state that consent cannot be reasonably be given by the time they make it to the hotel room.
I think that was another woman that accused him in 2005.I also saw in the paper that the guy that picked her up that night said she seemed to be happy etc after she'd left the apartment where she was allegedly raped.
She’ll know that she’s ruining her life by going public with this so doesn’t that add creedence to her accusations? Why would she bother otherwise? Even running out of the settlement money, it wasn’t THAT much, ten years later she wouldn’t have much left anyway if it was so important that she was living off it and desperate for more, that makes hardly any sense.
There’s something off about this in your opinion due to your biases. You think she’s trying to get more money and ruin his career.
So I’ll ask you this. What’s worse, a privileged man’s life being ‘ruined’ by a false rape accusation or an innocent woman’s life being ruined by getting raped and having to live with it for her entire life?
Give your fecking head a wobble.
You simply can’t rule out two things here:
a) All these years later she realises she settled for waaaay to little due to Ronaldo’s growth since then and has always been in it for the money. The original settlement was what? 35k a year for 10 years if thought of in salary terms?
b) He raped her, but it’s festered for all these years and she can’t let it go, she regrets taking the money and wants justice.
I personally think that anyone in situation b) should be forced to repay any monies received before going public and reinstating a rape claim. If Ronaldo raped her, he should go to prison, simples.
People are forgetting that this woman did not make the first move in re-opening this case, it came about because Ronaldo's lawyers were hacked.
Let's take the sexual politics out of this scenario and imagine that 8 years ago you felt your employer had made a terrible mistake and tried to raise this with them. This caused you no end of trouble and stress as the company disagreed and fought to discredit you. Eventually the situation escalates to the point that you feel no alternative but to resign and put in a tribunal claim.
The company agrees to settle this out of court as they do not want the publicity / cost of fighting a tribunal. You each sign a settlement agreement that offers compensation in exchange for resolution of the matter on a "no fault" basis and under strict confidentiality. No-one can comment or infer on the outcome or the fact that money was exchanged, if asked you have to say the matter was resolved amicably.
Fast forward a few years and you find out that the companies lawyers have been hacked and details of your case are all over the internet. Some people are saying you are the victim of an injustice, while others agree with your ex companies view and say you are just an opportunist who was out to make money all along.
How would you feel about being encouraged to dig over this again by your "supporters" and how would you feel having your behaviour and motives attacked by those that are advocates of your ex company?
I know that rape and sexual politics add an extra personal dimension here but can we all please not rush to judge and castigate either side until the facts are established.
Because he was exploiting women with his power and he's never denied it but the sex part was consensual (what we've learned so far).And you’ve already picked a side with Weinstein by calling him a horrible person haven’t you? Otherwise why would you think he was?
People are forgetting that this woman did not make the first move in re-opening this case, it came about because Ronaldo's lawyers were hacked.
You simply can’t rule out two things here:
a) All these years later she realises she settled for waaaay to little due to Ronaldo’s growth since then and has always been in it for the money. The original settlement was what? 35k a year for 10 years if thought of in salary terms?
b) He raped her, but it’s festered for all these years and she can’t let it go, she regrets taking the money and wants justice.
I personally think that anyone in situation b) should be forced to repay any monies received before going public and reinstating a rape claim. If Ronaldo raped her, he should go to prison, simples.
Isn't her new lawyer arguing though that due to certain technicalities/complications with the NDA, relating to her trauma/PTSD etc, that she technically isn't violating the NDA by speaking out now because of how it's worded? If that is the case and is an argument that holds up then she wouldn't owe Ronaldo a penny - it'd be on Ronaldo's lawyers for engineering an agreement that doesn't stand up to scrutiny or that wasn't worded correctly to protect him fully.
She’ll know that she’s ruining her life by going public with this so doesn’t that add creedence to her accusations? Why would she bother otherwise? Even running out of the settlement money, it wasn’t THAT much, ten years later she wouldn’t have much left anyway if it was so important that she was living off it and desperate for more, that makes hardly any sense.
There’s something off about this in your opinion due to your biases. You think she’s trying to get more money and ruin his career.
So I’ll ask you this. What’s worse, a privileged man’s life being ‘ruined’ by a false rape accusation or an innocent woman’s life being ruined by getting raped and having to live with it for her entire life?
Give your fecking head a wobble.
If she has proof of what she's saying then she should present it rather than being a dramatic twitter tease.
Makes sense but why cause a twitter storm randomly now.That sounds rather dismissive. She reached out to Mayorga and her legal team to work with them. Surely you can recognize that publishing any relevant details on Twitter before sharing it with lawyers is stupid.
Makes sense but why cause a twitter storm randomly now.
Makes sense but why cause a twitter storm randomly now.
Because she saw the RKelly doc and was moved by it? Do you guys not read stuff?
To be fair she tells you why, she watched something about R Kelly and it triggered her.
That R Kelly stuff came out months ago.
There was a documentary or something like that a few days ago.That R Kelly stuff came out months ago.
That R Kelly stuff came out months ago.
That R Kelly stuff came out months ago.
There was a documentary or something like that a few days ago.
A new documentary came out like last week.
The documentary Surviving R Kelly aired over three nights from January 3rd, 2019 to January 6th 2019.
