Woman accuses Cristiano Ronaldo of rape - CR7 case only

Status
Not open for further replies.
Things like this can't be labeled as unsurprising, its too simple to say imo.


I'm talking about the style of journalism the other poster was criticizing. Don't know how that can be seen as anything other than unsurprising, given the paper in question. I think you misunderstood me.
 
She said she was lying on her side in embryonal position, covering her vagina with her hands, because she didn't consent to sex of any sort. In that position he allegedly raped her anally.

http://www.spiegel.de/international...an-who-accuses-ronaldo-of-rape-a-1230634.html

Horrendous stuff.

Did you read the bit where Ronaldo supposedly admitted she said no several times during it?

Indeed. "No" and "stop", several times (apparently according to his own account). Plus, she reported the incident to the police the next day, and was examined, with photographs taken and evidence gathered. I think he's in pretty serious trouble.
 
I'm talking about the style of journalism the other poster was criticizing. Don't know how that can be seen as anything other than unsurprising, given the paper in question. I think you misunderstood me.
You are absolutely right, my mistake, should have asked first. :)

In that particular case you are spot on, not going to dismiss anything related with sensitive subjects like this.
 
But how it would be proved that it was non-consensual?

Nothing's in court yet, so we're looking at her public statements and some emails stolen from Ronaldo's lawyers. In amongst the stolen emails there's what looks like an admission that he heard her say no and stop several times - which sounds like the starting point of any actual investigation.
 
Nothing's in court yet, so we're looking at her public statements and some emails stolen from Ronaldo's lawyers. In amongst the stolen emails there's what looks like an admission that he heard her say no and stop several times - which sounds like the starting point of any actual investigation.
If the Football Leaks e-mails were to be used as a proof on a court in Portugal it would be denied, I think that's not the case on the United States.
 
Has there actually been any suggestion that the damning questionnaire that was leaked was either inaccurate or inauthentic? So far I've just seen it suggested that the way it was obtained was illegal.

The legal issues may be complex but surely the moral ones aren't? If the questionnaire is genuine then people will rightly judge Ronaldo guilty regardless of how it plays out legally in terms of being admissible or not.
 
Horrendous stuff.



Indeed. "No" and "stop", several times (apparently according to his own account). Plus, she reported the incident to the police the next day, and was examined, with photographs taken and evidence gathered. I think he's in pretty serious trouble.

She did that, but then decided to just drop it? On promise of payment?

That cannot go in her favour 9 years on surely?
 
This is a man who paid off a woman to give up the son she had with Ronaldo so that his mother and sister could raise him. Anyone capable of doing that is capable of rape, I'm going to say there's no smoke without fire on this one. He's probably a rapist.

How does your mind work pal?!

How is the son business any sort of sign of being a potential rapist?
Thank goodness you aren't any sort of lawyer or judge :nervous:
 
She did that, but then decided to just drop it? On promise of payment?

That cannot go in her favour 9 years on surely?

It goes even less in his favour though.

It's natural that people back up on the face of life changing money. It is also understandable that they eventually realise it wasn't enough or wasn't worth it.

As for the 9 years, well... I think the answer is obvious.
 
It goes even less in his favour though.

It's natural that people back up on the face of life changing money. It is also understandable that they eventually realise it wasn't enough or wasn't worth it.

Especially in the context of other women speaking out against high profile men. Regardless of what people think of the #metoo phenomenon it's certainly easy to see how it would cause women who didn't go public before now to reconsider.
 
How does your mind work pal?!

How is the son business any sort of sign of being a potential rapist?
Thank goodness you aren't any sort of lawyer or judge :nervous:

It’s someone using their financial power to intimidate and manipulate, a classic sex offender trait. Any lawyer or judge would agree with that, I know because my job is working face to face with convicted sex offenders.
 
It’s someone using their financial power to intimidate and manipulate, a classic sex offender trait. Any lawyer or judge would agree with that, I know because my job is working face to face with convicted sex offenders.

I imagine a lot of people who have miserable relationships with their kid's other parent would love to have the money to pay them to stay out of their life.
But I doubt most of them would automatically be rapists!
 
Reading a reddit thread on it says the actual quotes in Portugese are: "Nesse mesmo documento, o jogador é citado a dizer: “Ela disse que não e parou várias vezes”.

Which to quote the poster says translates as:

"She said that it wasn't and she stopped many times" That could mean she was ok with it (anal sex) and she stopped many times ( maybe because of the pain)

or

"She said no and she stopped many times"

But never (according to the Portuguese version) "She said no and stop several times".


So... whats the real translation?
Any Portuguese speaker here who can translate the original ?
 
Somewhat dreading the game at OT if Ronaldo is available. Him getting a hero’s welcome with this hanging over him would be a little awkward.
 
The translation is as quoted in the original article by Der Spiegel.
It would be a massive mistake by Spiegel tbh. So probably there is nothing wrong on that one.
 
So... whats the real translation?
Any Portuguese speaker here who can translate the original ?
Just go and read the documents submitted in Nevada if we want to read the source of what her lawyer’s are alledging happened. In it, she claims he raped her with her telling him to stop and no repeatedly, and leaked documents show Ronaldo acknowledging that with his damage control team.

http://www.spiegel.de/media/media-43488.pdf
 
Somewhat dreading the game at OT if Ronaldo is available. Him getting a hero’s welcome with this hanging over him would be a little awkward.
He doesn't have to be received like a hero or devil. Untill is proven he is guilty he shouldn't be already convicted, easier said than done of course, interesting to see if this will affect him on the pitch tomorrow, not that its the most important regarding this subject.
 
Where is the original if I may ask?
I have no idea. I read that post and was wondering if there was any chance of it being translated incorrectly.

The translation is as quoted in the original article by Der Spiegel.
If that leaked document is real and the translation is accurate, there isnt anything to discuss, is there? He is pretty much admitting to it.
Was the original document ever released?
 
If that leaked document is real and the translation is accurate, there isnt anything to discuss, is there? He is pretty much admitting to it.
If its proven the source of the leaked emails is correct in the United States I think it can be used against him on court. If the case was in Portugal I think hacked emails can't be used as evidence not 100% sure.
 
Just go and read the documents submitted in Nevada if we want to read the source of what her lawyer’s are alledging happened. In it, she claims he raped her with her telling him to stop and no repeatedly, and leaked documents show Ronaldo acknowledging that with his damage control team.

http://www.spiegel.de/media/media-43488.pdf

Does not look good.
 
I've seen this translation problem being mentioned, but even if you can dispute the word "parar" ou "parou" (although even the "less bad" interpretation would imply she was in pain) which would change the meaning, the part where he said "ela disse não", can only be translated one way: "she said no". No way to interpret it any other way.
 
He doesn't have to be received like a hero or devil. Untill is proven he is guilty he shouldn't be already convicted, easier said than done of course, interesting to see if this will affect him on the pitch tomorrow, not that its the most important regarding this subject.
I think this is the biggest problem isn’t it. Nothing has been proven but people have already made their minds up about it and his reputation in many ways will never be the same.

I feel sorry for his kids.
 
I think this is the biggest problem isn’t it. Nothing has been proven but people have already made their minds up about it and his reputation in many ways will never be the same.

I feel sorry for his kids.
Look I also admire him being a player for my country and he has the right to defend himself but there is a redline here. If he did something wrong he has to be judged like a normal citizen, not guilty or inocent just because he is rich and famous. This are serious charges to be entirelly dismissed only because we like someone, or to be already convicted if you don't like the person too.

@maniak No they wouldn't mess up with this translation, Spiegel is not Correio da Manhã.
 
I've seen this translation problem being mentioned, but even if you can dispute the word "parar" ou "parou" (although even the "less bad" interpretation would imply she was in pain) which would change the meaning, the part where he said "ela disse não", can only be translated one way: "she said no". No way to interpret it any other way.
Not sure why translations are even being discussed when you can just read the complaint documents submitted in Nevada. Have I missed something?
 
I remember that case and there was some third party evidence that suggested it wasn't true. The women involved went out drinking with Ronaldo (and his sidekick) again after having sex.

This new case needs to be treated seriously in its own right.

I agree. My point was that with a previous similar allegation, this current one takes on more credibility.
 
The translation 'problem' is a problem with the Portuguese translation of the German article which wasn't done very well.

The paper in question were simply providing a translation of the German claims. They were not claiming to be quoting the original documents and the article I believe has since been ammended to better reflect what was said in Germany.
 
The more that’s revealed the more damning it sounds for him.

It's snowballing and it sounds fecking awful. If any of it is true, he deserves to rot in jail. Of course he won't. At the very least he should pay out huge amount of money a lose all his sponsors. Anyway, sounds damning but I will wait until all the facts are revealed before making a final judgement.
 
Does anyone for a second believe Ronaldo of all people has to rape someone to have sex? Jesus Christ.. The man doesn't even drink to rule out the sane/sober mind arguement (if there was one).

American Woman is out for a quick buck.. shocker.

EDIT: Really should educate myself with the article/facts before jumping too conclusions.

Firstly I haven't read much of this thread barring a few posts on the first page, and I do get that you have backtracked with the edit a little bit.

That notwithstanding, this might be the worst post I have ever read on RedCafe.

I would suggest that in addition to educating yourself on the facts of this case, you should also educate yourself on the law of rape and sexual assault, prevailing attitudes that the MeToo movement are fighting against and the myriad cases involving abuses of power and sexual crimes that have come to light recently before commenting on issues like this.
 
Firstly I haven't read much of this thread barring a few posts on the first page, and I do get that you have backtracked with the edit a little bit.

That notwithstanding, this might be the worst post I have ever read on RedCafe.

I would suggest that in addition to educating yourself on the facts of this case, you should also educate yourself on the law of rape and sexual assault, prevailing attitudes that the MeToo movement are fighting against and the myriad cases involving abuses of power and sexual crimes that have come to light recently before commenting on issues like this.

I would tend to agree with you on this being one of the worst posts around, but then on this same page we have “It was ten years ago. She can feck off”. I think that absolutely has to take the cake for the worst post ever.
 
Apparently he's now saying it's all part of the revenge plan of Fiorentino Perez.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.