What you are underestimating is the rivalry between Chelsea and us and between conte (juve legend) and mou (interested legend). If we end up winning the league and Willianot prove to be a key component to that then plenty of people will end up looking like fools
Aye, the premise of your post is spot on and great. We need a fast, hardworking right winger. But why spend all that money solely on Willian to do those things when many others can do the exact same? He doesn't score or assist much, and he's not particularly creative. What can he do that other wings for such a purported fee can't? Splash the cash on Mkhitaryan instead, who has the same traits but 55 goals/assists in 52 matches for Dortmund this season.I can believe that the manager would be interested in Willian.
Mourinho tends to want pace and power in wide areas. Hazard and Willian, Ronaldo and Di Maria...Mou even converted Eto'o into a wide player, to compensate for the lack of pace and power on the flanks at Inter. When the people above him aren't forcing him to change his tactics to make room for their friends, like Abramovich did with Shevchenko, Mourinho will always use fast, strong, wide players.
Willian would ensure the manager could have strong, speedy outlets on both flanks. On the left wing he has options. Martial is rapid and deceptively strong. Memphis is also built like a tank and can stretch his legs. Young has played his best football for United off the left too, and while he is fast he's not exactly built like a brick house. On the right, unless Mourinho plans to make Valencia a winger again, there's nobody with real speed and strength in our squad. Lingard works hard but he's not physical or very fast, Januzaj's quite lightweight, Mata's lightweight too.
This transfer would actually make sense if Woodward could make it work. The fee is irrelevant to me. We live in a world where Raheem Sterling cost £50 million. If the club has the cash it should spend it. I remember thinking Mou's Chelsea had overpaid for players I'd, at the time, not heard much of. Namely, Robben, Essien and Drogba. In the end they proved to be sound investments because Mou's system got the best out of them. Willian would be the same.
Look at who those players have been in winning teams in the past and you'll find it's almost always youth players or cheap players being used to fill that role. It'd be an utter travesty to spend that amount of money on Willian for that role.
In the second half of the season from when Bidding took over (The Watford game) Costa got 12 goals and 7 assists ine 20 games.Definitely wouldn't agree with your thoughts on Costa having an amazing second half to the season. He certainly had a spell where he looked bright but that lasted just over a month, not the whole second half of the season. While I agree Willian's performances certainly dipped in the second half they remained quite good for the most part. That being said, it's his performances under Mourinho that should really be concentrated on moreso than the performances he gave under Hiddink and while Mourinho was there Willian performed admirably at a time when the rest of the team were seriously underperforming. He won't be the guy to score you crazy numbers of goals, there are other players we can get for that like Ibra or James Rodriguez, but he'll be a very useful team player in tough games. He'll offer constant running and effective tracking back. You need those type of players to succeed sometimes.
Definitely wouldn't agree with your thoughts on Costa having an amazing second half to the season. He certainly had a spell where he looked bright but that lasted just over a month, not the whole second half of the season. While I agree Willian's performances certainly dipped in the second half they remained quite good for the most part. That being said, it's his performances under Mourinho that should really be concentrated on moreso than the performances he gave under Hiddink and while Mourinho was there Willian performed admirably at a time when the rest of the team were seriously underperforming. He won't be the guy to score you crazy numbers of goals, there are other players we can get for that like Ibra or James Rodriguez, but he'll be a very useful team player in tough games. He'll offer constant running and effective tracking back. You need those type of players to succeed sometimes.
I'm not advocating spending anything like £60m on Willian but for £30-35m he'd be a good buy imo. Not many young players with the physique and talent to actually fill that role at United. Can you think of any off the top of your head that would be possible?
As crazy as it sounds, I agree with the suggestion of Valencia. He's not as good, but for the role you're suggesting, Willian isn't worth spending £30m on when you have Valencia.
If I was a Man Utd fan I wouldn't want either player to start though, I don't think that type of player is as essential as others do.
I'd like to think your youth academy could fill that position too. Spending £30m on that type of player is crazy, there's dozens of Willian type players out there.
Aye, the premise of your post is spot on and great. We need a fast, hardworking right winger. But why spend all that money solely on Willian to do those things when many others can do the exact same? He doesn't score or assist much, and he's not particularly creative. What can he do that other wings for such a purported fee can't? Splash the cash on Mkhitaryan instead, who has the same traits but 55 goals/assists in 52 matches for Dortmund this season.
In the second half of the season from when Bidding took over (The Watford game) Costa got 12 goals and 7 assists ine 20 games.
For comparison, Harry Kane scored 15 goals and got 1 assistso in the same time period.
Disagree basically.
Theres other players like him but none are as good as him.
I'd bite your hand off for willian @ 30m
If you buy Zlatan, I genuinely don't see Rashford being a huge downgrade on Willian if he played on the right.
He's not as strong, obviously, but he's just as quick. Everything else that Willian has an over Rashford can be coached by Mourinho given a few months - Willian doesn't exactly do anything that isn't easily coached. Plus Rashford would chip in with more goals.
Whether you wanted to "waste" Rashford on the right is another matter, though.
Not but Willian never reached the level Costa did last season either. I agree he was better but it's quite close between them.Alright my mistake, I remembered the goals drying up before the end of the season but his run was definitely impressive under Hiddink. Can't really argue with his goalscoring consistency at that time. It still can't make up for only 4 goals in the season before that though. Willian's performances didn't drop to the extent that Costa's did during the first half of the season.
Again, i flat out disagree
I rate him a lot higher than you i guess.
Rashford wont play every single match (i imagine, who knows).
Ibra wont either, between the two of them they'll keep the strikers position covered
So we still need someone on the right.
As crazy as it sounds, I agree with the suggestion of Valencia. He's not as good, but for the role you're suggesting, Willian isn't worth spending £30m on when you have Valencia.
If I was a Man Utd fan I wouldn't want either player to start though, I don't think that type of player is as essential as others do.
I'd like to think your youth academy could fill that position too. Spending £30m on that type of player is crazy, there's dozens of Willian type players out there.
If that was the case I'm sure we'd have seen that player at least featuring by now.As crazy as it sounds, I agree with the suggestion of Valencia. He's not as good, but for the role you're suggesting, Willian isn't worth spending £30m on when you have Valencia.
If I was a Man Utd fan I wouldn't want either player to start though, I don't think that type of player is as essential as others do.
I'd like to think your youth academy could fill that position too. Spending £30m on that type of player is crazy, there's dozens of Willian type players out there.
If you buy Zlatan, I genuinely don't see Rashford being a huge downgrade on Willian if he played on the right.
He's not as strong, obviously, but he's just as quick. Everything else that Willian has over Rashford can be coached by Mourinho given a few months - Willian doesn't exactly do anything that isn't easily coached. Plus Rashford would chip in with more goals.
Whether you wanted to "waste" Rashford on the right is another matter, though.
Lingard couldIf that was the case I'm sure we'd have seen that player at least featuring by now.
Over the last year or so, van Gaal made no secret of the fact he wanted 'fast, creative wingers' as he put it. The fact that he persisted with Mata and Lingard on the right for the vast majority of the season suggests we probably don't have anyone capable of playing there at a good level.
Valencia has been decent enough at full back since returning but I think he'd struggle if he was used as our main outlet on the right wing again. If it's a direct choice between him and Willian, Willian wins out every time.
Lingard is painfully average, I'd be very worried if we were going into next season with him as a starter.Lingard could
He is very good and hardworking defensively, works well in the build up and chips in with a few goals every now and then. Certainly not as good as Willian but Mourinho could develop him into a similar player ability wise.Lingard is painfully average, I'd be very worried if we were going into next season with him as a starter.
Massive upgrade on Lingard. But he'd probably cost double what it would take to land Mane, who is at least as good. Not to mention Mahrez.
You're wasting your time defending Lingard on here but I tend to agree that he could be developed into a very good player and if Mourinho gives him a shot it'll certainly be interesting.He is very good and hardworking defensively, works well in the build up and chips in with a few goals every now and then. Certainly not as good as Willian but Mourinho could develop him into a similar player ability wise.
If that was the case I'm sure we'd have seen that player at least featuring by now.
Over the last year or so, van Gaal made no secret of the fact he wanted 'fast, creative wingers' as he put it. The fact that he persisted with Mata and Lingard on the right for the vast majority of the season suggests we probably don't have anyone capable of playing there at a good level.
Valencia has been decent enough at full back since returning but I think he'd struggle if he was used as our main outlet on the right wing again. If it's a direct choice between him and Willian, Willian wins out every time.
Interesting. I suppose Rashford could play the role but do you really want to risk coaching his natural striker instincts out of him? I'd worry he'd stop making the right runs and his positioning would suffer. Playing him there every now and then would probably be fine but if he plays a full season there, that could be more damaging to him imo. While Martial is better as a winger who cuts in from the wing, Rashford is definitely a pure striker imo (though one with excellent dribbling and link-up play).
Even if that's true and Conte hates Mourinho that much, it doesn't mean Jose will actually meet that valuation. It certainly wouldn't surprise me if Mourinho is interested in Willian but he'll know his actual value. I'll be surprised if he ends up bringing him in for anything like the amount being mentioned. I don't think people should trust the Sun anyway, very unreliable paper. We may well have interest since Jamie Jackson has mentioned Willian's name but he doesn't mention a price, only the Sun have done that. I seriously doubt they have any idea of how much Chelsea and United value the player at. It's more likely they just decided on a random transfer fee.
He's not nearly quick enough, nor does he have the creative output necessary for Mourinho to seriously consider him as a starter on the wing. He'll be a squad player at best.He is very good and hardworking defensively, works well in the build up and chips in with a few goals every now and then. Certainly not as good as Willian but Mourinho could develop him into a similar player ability wise.
I can see conte sell willian since he already have cuadrado there. However he won't sell him on cheap especially since I believe he would want to spend the dosh on pogba
OK, maybe not confident, I just have a feeling that they will. New manager coming in, will probably favour Cuadrado and they have previous with selling their POTY to us when a change of manager takes place.
Also if we do sign him, I would still buy a right winger/forward. We really should be utilising him as the furthest forward central midfielder. He is brilliant at carrying the ball from deep, great passer and crosser and also can go the other way (which is probably one of the reasons he has a reputation for maybe not being good enough because people only think of him as a good defender).
This video shows his class.
Also, he did score 11 goals and get 7 assists in a very poor chelsea side.
And, his average who scored rating is 7.20 in the premier league (better than any Manchester United season except Shaw - and we all know why that is). And for all competitions is 7.36, again, far better than any Manchester United player.
Ivanovic can eat a dickMata and Darmian plus £20m for Ivanovic and Willian would be great business for us. I think Chelsea would take Mata back, fans favourite and all that.
Mata and Darmian plus £20m for Ivanovic and Willian would be great business for us. I think Chelsea would take Mata back, fans favourite and all that.
Why in gods name would we want Ivanovic?[/QUOTE
He had a shite half season but before that was the best right back in the PL.
Mourinho had a shite half season too, before that he was the best manager in the Pl.......
On the topic of swap. Would people swap directly Mata for Willian? I would definitely.You know silly season is upon us when people start talking about swapping multiple players, which happens in reality, like, never.
You can feck right off with that.On the topic of swap. Would people swap directly Mata for Willian? I would definitely.