William Carvalho

Status
Not open for further replies.
Indeed. Only in pre-season when everyone else was at half mast. I'm not au fait with the biology of it all so it's merely an educated guess, but you'd assume the very fact his muscles would have to build up again after such a long period of not even training, would "age" them, so to speak. Not to mention it's effect on stamina etc. He's probably closer to a 33 year old footballer than a 30 year old one.

Awesome bit of cod science there, mockers. Although as an educated guess it would be harsh to sneer.

I don't think it's anything to do with some kind of muscular deficit. Just needs to get his brain back up to speed. He's basically a bit rusty. Which is to be expected in someone who's played so little football in recent years. He'll be grand in a slower paced game but at the highest level he'll look a wee bit off the pace as it's not coming to him instinctively. Anyone who's played any sport at any level can relate to that. When you haven't picked up a racket/kicked a ball/swung a golf club (I hate golf) in a year or two, you always feel a bit retarded in your first few competitive games. That's going to be even more exaggerated at an elite level.
 
Awesome bit of cod science there, mockers. Although as an educated guess it would be harsh to sneer.

I don't think it's anything to do with some kind of muscular deficit. Just needs to get his brain back up to speed. He's basically a bit rusty. Which is to be expected in someone who's played so little football in recent years. He'll be grand in a slower paced game but at the highest level he'll look a wee bit off the pace as it's not coming to him instinctively. Anyone who's played any sport at any level can relate to that. When you haven't picked up a racket/kicked a ball/swung a golf club (I hate golf) in a year or two, you always feel a bit retarded in your first few competitive games. That's going to be even more exaggerated at an elite level.

Weirdly I just edited in an @ to you after I wrote that. It is complete guess work, admittedly.

So physically it should have NO effect? He should hypothetically be able to re-reach the same level of a normal 30 year old player?
 
Bit off topic but in every line up people give with either Vidal or Carvalho in it, Mata is always the problem of how we should fit him. Great player but no matter the line up we either sacrifice either Rooney or RVP (one being the captain and the other arguably the best striker in the PL) or if we fit both of them in the line up then we sacrifice width and the progress of Januzaj's potential. The only reason Mata will continue to play is he was a marquee player.

For me no matter who we signed from Vidal or Carvalho, if we're serious about getting the best out of our team it cannot include both Mata and Rooney and with Rooney's defensive qualities I know who i'd choose to play behind the striker.

4231

......Herrera-Carvalh
Januzaj-Rooney-Di Maria
.............RVP


433

Herrera..Carvalho..Rooney
Januzaj...RVP...Di Maria
Mata is the most creative player we have and we will not (and should not) bench a 37 million signing after seven months unless we can sell him for the same amount. Besides, maybe we haven't seen the best of him yet because he's playing in a broken team, but you could argue he's still been our best outfield player since signing.
 
Is he excellent defensively? Would love a midfielder who is a rock infront of the defence at this point. Not sure we should spend big on one though given I dont think thats the way forward.
 
Mata is the most creative player we have and we will not (and should not) bench a 37 million signing after seven months unless we can sell him for the same amount. Besides, maybe we haven't seen the best of him yet because he's playing in a broken team, but you could argue he's still been our best outfield player since signing.

He scores too many goals from central areas to drop him. We're a team that lacks goals. Getting rid of one of our goalscorers is just.... uh? It's not going to happen. Van Gaal will want to fit Mata, Rooney and RVP into the same side because he trusts those players.
 
Weirdly I just edited in an @ to you after I wrote that. It is complete guess work, admittedly.

So physically it should have NO effect? He should hypothetically be able to re-reach the same level of a normal 30 year old player?

I'm not a sports scientist, so probably not qualified to give a definitive answer. But I can't think of any good reason why he wouldn't. I guess taking a year or two out of the development of a younger player would have long-term consequences in terms of fulfilling their potential but he was already fairly fully formed as a footballer when he took his enforced sabbatical. Also worth noting that he doesn't seem to be one of those natural athletes, to whom everything comes easy. He's always looked like someone who's had to work bloody hard to get where he is. Which means he'll also have to work long and hard to get back to his best.

I just think it will take him a good few games to get used to the cut and thrust of PL football. 5 games? A dozen? Feck knows really but I wouldn't be too worried about him looking miles off the pace in his first two games back. Just a pity we're already so reliant on him when he's evidently under-cooked.
 
Well that's what I mean. Even if 30 isn't too bad, the chances of him being up to the peak physical fitness of a normal 30 year old midfielder are low. So it's not unreasonable to treat him like he's slightly older.
Don't get me wrong id love for is to sign Vidal and carvalho, or either one. I just think it's unfair to insinuate that fletcher is finished. He has just had his first preseason in a few seasons. He himself says that his illness is cured with the surgery, it's now a matter of games
 
Is he excellent defensively? Would love a midfielder who is a rock infront of the defence at this point. Not sure we should spend big on one though given I dont think thats the way forward.

I watched a lot of Carvalho last season after our links, and while I saw enough to encourage me, there were one or two key concerns for me that mean it could still go either way with him.

Basically, if he closed down and covered ground like say - James Macarthy, I'd be totally sold. However, he closes down more at the speed of Fellaini. That's my issue.
 
Well that's what I mean. Even if 30 isn't too bad, the chances of him being up to the peak physical fitness of a normal 30 year old midfielder are low. So it's not unreasonable to treat him like he's slightly older.
Exactly this. I'm not sure how he can recover from the illness still and whether he can recover to a level close to his best, because at the moment the signs are not that positive.

I watched a lot of Carvalho last season after our links, and while I saw enough to encourage me, there were one or two key concerns for me that mean it could still go either way with him.

Basically, if he closed down and covered ground like say - James Macarthy, I'd be totally sold. However, he closes down more at the speed of Fellaini. That's my issue.
From what I've seen he reads the game well, however that concern is valid as he's not one of the explosive players in terms of pace and speed. He's a bit slow which is the major concern playing in a fast paced league as the Premier League.
 
The only person convinced we'll play 4-3-3 is yourself.

Di Maria has said he'll play in the middle which is his best position. Considering the fee its very likely he will indeed play there.

I think we'll play the diamond, which is a system Van Gaal has used previously. It's also a system that follows the same logic of his 3-5-2 as it gets Mata, Rooney and Van Persie into their best positions. It would also get the best out of Di Maria.

United-formation-tactics.png

This formation makes the most sense to me as well. It looks balanced and has all players playing in their natural position.

This whole transfer story is a bit weird though, come think of it.. If the club leaked it, why would they want to announce to the world that the price has been dropped to £24 m? And nothing is being reported in the Portugese media according to Sly. Compare it with Vidal who's linked to United pretty much daily by all the Italian papers.
 
How many players have missed those years he did, come back at 29.30 and gone on to be even as good as he was before, when a lot of his game relied on energy.
 
Would be a good price if we had 100 of his rights. Since we only have 60% it will be a more complicated negotiation. Good news is that it´s a friendly fund to Sporting and it´s not Doyen.
Aargh, thanks for the info mate. So if Sporting accept an fee - is that resumably only for his 60% rights or is it reasonable to assume Sporting would have contacted the agency already?
 
This formation makes the most sense to me as well. It looks balanced and has all players playing in their natural position.

This whole transfer story is a bit weird though, come think of it.. If the club leaked it, why would they want to announce to the world that the price has been dropped to £24 m? And nothing is being reported in the Portugese media according to Sly. Compare it with Vidal who's linked to United pretty much daily by all the Italian papers.
The diamond looks great on paper. It could work really well.
 
I watched a lot of Carvalho last season after our links, and while I saw enough to encourage me, there were one or two key concerns for me that mean it could still go either way with him.

Basically, if he closed down and covered ground like say - James Macarthy, I'd be totally sold. However, he closes down more at the speed of Fellaini. That's my issue.
That could be an issue in the premier league given Fellaini tends to be two minutes too late.
 
Just a year and a half ago many were around the league were pegging Fellaini as and up and comer and one year here and he has become the standard for comparing with other under performing players. The Fellaini buy is a watershed moment in the crumbling of Utd, what a waste.
 
Just spent the last 5 minutes watching a slew of Carvalho vids and I'm not blown away tbh. Obviously you can't get things like positional discipline or consistency from them but he doesn't look like the next big thing. What do people who watch him alot think? I'm worried about just buying bodies. We've got bodies. We need actual, big quality.
 
Just spent the last 5 minutes watching a slew of Carvalho vids and I'm not blown away tbh. Obviously you can't get things like positional discipline or consistency from them but he doesn't look like the next big thing. What do people who watch him alot think? I'm worried about just buying bodies. We've got bodies. We need actual, big quality.
Watch this one since 5 minutes doesn't do him justice.


Also Sly who watches him every week, says he is the best player to come out of their academy since Ronaldo and its a really big deal.
 
I'm not a sports scientist, so probably not qualified to give a definitive answer. But I can't think of any good reason why he wouldn't. I guess taking a year or two out of the development of a younger player would have long-term consequences in terms of fulfilling their potential but he was already fairly fully formed as a footballer when he took his enforced sabbatical. Also worth noting that he doesn't seem to be one of those natural athletes, to whom everything comes easy. He's always looked like someone who's had to work bloody hard to get where he is. Which means he'll also have to work long and hard to get back to his best.

I just think it will take him a good few games to get used to the cut and thrust of PL football. 5 games? A dozen? Feck knows really but I wouldn't be too worried about him looking miles off the pace in his first two games back. Just a pity we're already so reliant on him when he's evidently under-cooked.
I'm not sure what his syndrome does exactly to his body on the long term and possible effect, surely he needs time to recover, but for me looks long time off the game. I'm making comparisons with other athletes suffering from mono that took them out for year or two and were never the same(wrong as it may be to compare the two conditions).
 
The diamond looks great on paper. It could work really well.

Yeah and another formation that I don't think has ever worked in the premier league. Ancelotti tried it and switched to 4-3-3 with Chelsea a few months later.

AC Milan are the only team in recent history, who perfected the diamond. And that was because they had four world class defenders at the time too. We need as much protection as possible to our defence even if it means dropping Mata or Rooney/RVP.
 
Yeah and another formation that I don't think has ever worked in the premier league. Ancelotti tried it and switched to 4-3-3 with Chelsea a few months later.

AC Milan are the only team in recent history, who perfected the diamond. And that was because they had four world class defenders at the time too. We need as much protection as possible to our defence even if it means dropping Mata or Rooney/RVP.
Liverpool used it for most of last season, Ancelotti and Fergie both toyed with it to some success and I'm sure some of the lesser clubs have utilised something similar. It isn't a completely alien concept, in fact it's probably been used with greater success than a back 3.
 
I'm not sure what his syndrome does exactly to his body on the long term and possible effect, surely he needs time to recover, but for me looks long time off the game. I'm making comparisons with other athletes suffering from mono that took them out for year or two and were never the same(wrong as it may be to compare the two conditions).

Mono's a bit of a mixed bag but there's a general theme of some sort of pain/weakness in muscles. That's why fibromyalgia is one of the terms used to describe chronic mono. Fibromy- meaning (skeletal) muscle and -algia meaning pain. Obviously this is a big problem in competitive sport and you never hear of anyone continuing to play sport when they're unwell.

UC has no effect on the muscles at all and there are loads of examples of people still competing at the highest level, even when they're symptomatic (which Fletcher isn't, apparently) Steve Redgrave won olympic gold medals after his diagnosis.
 
Liverpool used it for most of last season, Ancelotti and Fergie both toyed with it to some success and I'm sure some of the lesser clubs have utilised something similar. It isn't a completely alien concept, in fact it's probably been used with greater success than a back 3.

Wouldn't work with RVP, Rooney and Mata though. Just too slow of attack.

Liverpool tried various formations last season, all four of their attackers were interchanging well. Kind of like what we were doing in 06-09.
 
Watch this one since 5 minutes doesn't do him justice.


Also Sly who watches him every week, says he is the best player to come out of their academy since Ronaldo and its a really big deal.


Now that's much better.
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't work with RVP, Rooney and Mata though. Just too slow of attack.

Liverpool tried various formations last season, all four of their attackers were interchanging well. Kind of like what we were doing in 06-09.
Which is why Van Persie, who offers absolutely nothing in his current state, should be dropped for Welbeck or even Wilson. Van Persie puts in less effort than anyone else, never presses the defenders and makes minimal contributions to build up play. With age he's becoming more and more of a penalty box striker, one who'd rather wait for others to do the dirty work and take the glory himself. He has always been, and continues to be, a great finisher, but the team isn't functioning and with his laziness/lack of fitness he's a passenger. He might not be match fit but he's been poor for a long time now, if he isn't match fit, we shouldn't play him.
 
He's a great player, and has everything to become better. If the likes of Matic or Fernando (this one to my surprise) don't look out of place in the Premiership, I sincerely doubt Carvalho will.
 
Opposition fans don't understand how much United fans need this. To go from picking one of Anderson, Fletcher, Fellaini or Cleverley to partner a declining Carrick to having the option of Carvalho, Di Maria and Herrera instead in just the space of two months is something that can only be described as :drool:.
 
I'm starting to wonder whether we'd better getting Blind and Carvalho for the same money it would take to get Vidal - possibly less actually.

Carvalho would bring stability to both our midfielder and our back 4 by shielding them, and Blind effectively fills two positions with one squad place due to his versatility.

Vidal is all action and I adore him as a player but given how physical and box-to-box he is, that injury does concern me.

I believe we would be better of if we get a number 6 and another box to box midfielder. Blind versatility is a plus to have, but if you look at our number 8 in the team, we have Herrera, Cleverley, Fellaini, Anderson and Powell. Beside Herrera and perhaps Powell, those other players do not give me soo much confidence. Blind is a number 6 or a defender and we have better cover in those area. The list of players in the number 8 role does not give us quality in depth and when Herrera gets injuried or is out of form, we do not have a quality player to occupy this position. As such, I believe we will be better of with William Carvalho and a number 8 like Vidal or Mateo Kovaciç. Kovaciç would be more ideal, if we want to give a player like Herrera an opportunity to performance at United.

I had a similar number of posts when I was promoted... Just started posting at the end of the season when the board was quiet!

While we are on full Muppet, why not try for both him and Blind. Blind gives us the utility man player role. That role seems currently allocated to Jones which seems to be hindering his development as a defender.

I believe we need another number 8 alongside Carvalho more so than we needed a utility man whose main role is in the number 6 position or in defense.
 
A midfield of Herrera, Vidal and Carvalho would be incredible. Pretty much able to go toe to toe with any midfield in Europe.
 
Yeah and another formation that I don't think has ever worked in the premier league. Ancelotti tried it and switched to 4-3-3 with Chelsea a few months later.

AC Milan are the only team in recent history, who perfected the diamond. And that was because they had four world class defenders at the time too. We need as much protection as possible to our defence even if it means dropping Mata or Rooney/RVP.
DIdn't Chelsea Win two titles and set a new defensive record for fewest conceded with a diamond in Mou's first run there?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.