The Corinthian
I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2020
- Messages
- 12,107
- Supports
- A Free Palestine
2 min silence?Can we please spare a thought for @Abraxas in these difficult moments?
2 min silence?Can we please spare a thought for @Abraxas in these difficult moments?
Because you're essentially saying none of your MPs are up to task (they're not, this became apparent at the end of Johnson). However true that is it's not gonna sit well.Why not, exactly? They voted for him as PM, so why not? And surely there cannot be many Tory voters mad enough to actually miss Suella.
Braverman did not inspire the protests, despite her and the right wing media attempting to make up a different narrative.Yes, indeed the protesters can keep 'howling at the moon' now, especially with Braverman gone, the 'bogey-woman' has got her wish to be banished to middle England.
Because you're essentially saying none of your MPs are up to task (they're not, this became apparent at the end of Johnson). However true that is it's not gonna sit well.
You've then got rid of Suella, a figurehead of the right and ERG, and replaced her with a remainer for foreign secretary. Again not gonna sit well, already seeing tweets of meetings taking place between senior Tory party members.
Because you're essentially saying none of your MPs are up to task (they're not, this became apparent at the end of Johnson). However true that is it's not gonna sit well.
You've then got rid of Suella, a figurehead of the right and ERG, and replaced her with a remainer for foreign secretary. Again not gonna sit well, already seeing tweets of meetings taking place between senior Tory party members.
You say that about foreign secretary, but please genuinely tell me the last time a party in power plucked out a former PM (or anyone not technically in government for that matter) and gave him a lordship just to take up the position? It's pretty damning if you work for the party.Well, Foreign Secretary is a post out of the ordinary, even at the best of times there will be very few people in any parliamentary party who's really up to it. So it's hardly a resounding declaration of bankruptcy.
Certainly many, many Tory MPs won't like the weakening of the ERG position in the cabinet, but I don't necessarily think the same applies to Tory voters these days. At least not prospective Tory voters.
You say that about foreign secretary, but please genuinely tell me the last time a party in power plucked out a former PM (or anyone not technically in government for that matter) and gave him a lordship just to take up the position? It's pretty damning if you work for the party.
And tbf I'm not talking about Tory voters I'm talking about the actual party and MPs.
I don't usually praise him but does anyone else think waiting out the weekend and then sacking Suella first thing Monday morning was the best way Sunak could deal with this (other than not appointing her in the first place, obviously)?
You say that about foreign secretary, but please genuinely tell me the last time a party in power plucked out a former PM (or anyone not technically in government for that matter) and gave him a lordship just to take up the position? It's pretty damning if you work for the party.
Peter Mandelson for Labour might be the last time it happened when Gordon Brown was PMYou say that about foreign secretary, but please genuinely tell me the last time a party in power plucked out a former PM (or anyone not technically in government for that matter) and gave him a lordship just to take up the position? It's pretty damning if you work for the party.
And tbf I'm not talking about Tory voters I'm talking about the actual party and MPs.
Not sure he counts because he was a hereditary peer alreadyLord Carrington in 1979.
On principal I agree yet I fear that would have added yet another "cause" and maybe increased the number of ***** at "her" protests.No. Sacking her within minutes of the article going out stating the contents were wildly inappropriate (at best and an attempt to incite a race riot at worst) and actually showing he could be decisive and lead with strength would have been the way to go.
Stop it. Remembrance weekend is not a thing, no one has ever called it remembrance weekend before now. The two minute silence on Armistice day was only re introduced in 1995 and it is not a day of remembrance.Don't need a focus group, 'middle england' will not be happy about the desecration of the Remembrance weekend, it does not occur that often that Armistice day and Remembrance Sunday fall as they have this year. Now Sunak has banished his 'bogey-woman' he has no one to blame and everyone to appease... what's that saying about "keeping friends close and enemies closer still". Sunak has just lost his 'get out of jail free card' and ironically, he has potentially let Starmer off the hook as well!
Westminster Politics indeed, suppose we should acknowledge the protesters part in all this, they may not have advanced their cause on a ceasefire in Gaza, but have certainly helped to open an even further rift in the Tory ranks.
I don't usually praise him but does anyone else think waiting out the weekend and then sacking Suella first thing Monday morning was the best way Sunak could deal with this (other than not appointing her in the first place, obviously)?
Protesting for a different response from the UK government (and opposition) is not "howling at the moon". It's a perfectly respectable position.
Stop it. Remembrance weekend is not a thing, no one has ever called it remembrance weekend before now. The two minute silence on Armistice day was only re introduced in 1995 and it is not a day of remembrance.
Stop it. Remembrance weekend is not a thing, no one has ever called it remembrance weekend before now. The two minute silence on Armistice day was only re introduced in 1995 and it is not a day of remembrance.
Admittedly not normally as a specific weekend, but it was this weekend, as both days occurred in the same period. Also recognition of the Armistice was always considered by many people as part of the 'act of Remembrance', which is why the two minutes silence was reintroduced.
Not for long I suspect.
She will be now discussing her position with her power base. A very right wing power base no doubt.
And she will be planning her strategy.
My guess, for what it is worth, is that she may play the long game and, while agitating and making life difficult for Sunak, she may wait until he loses the next election.
And then make her play for leadership.
But as often happens I could be completely wrong.
Meanwhile, listening to the current discussion, Tory spokesmen have said that David Cameron brings credibility to the government and can hit the ground running because he is an established world leader.
Such a fantastic world leader who wanted to get much closer to China for example and told the UK that he would be able to pursued the EU to reform or else we would leave.
None of those ended well.
And he brings to the government One Nation Tories.
His idea of one nation was years of savage Austerity.
Remember his slogan....We Are All In It Together....
She’s going to have more spare time for her favourite past time now - being an apex predator.British nature breathes a sigh of relief.
For my part I'm horrified by how the armistice remembrance is being weaponised for the purposes of right-wing culture war. If there's one thing the armistice remembrance should not be, it's that. All decent people need to push back against that. It's an insult to the men who died, far more so than failing to wear a poppy, or stealing the limelight for some different cause on the day in question.
Admittedly not normally as a specific weekend, but it was this weekend, as both days occurred in the same period. Also recognition of the Armistice was always considered by many people as part of the 'act of Remembrance', which is why the two minutes silence was reintroduced.
I entirely agree, the protest should have been deferred, no protest of any description should be used to 'weaponise' Armistice and Remembrance days, whether they form part of a weekend or not.
It might have been referred to as that, but it certainly isn’t a weekend of remembrance. It was also very convenient for MP’s and the press to push that narrative, even though the protest was never going anywhere near the cenotaph.
The two minutes silence was observed by those protesting, there is no expectation beyond that on the 11th. I genuinely think a lot of people (not you) are confusing armistice day and Remembrance Sunday. The cenotaph is not a big event on the 11th.
I carried on doing my food shop and going about my day, football started at 12.30, loads of the country would have been having drinks in the afternoon and not “remembering” the end of World War One.
I entirely agree, the protest should have been deferred, no protest of any description should be used to 'weaponise' Armistice and Remembrance days, whether they form part of a weekend or not.
She’s going to have more spare time for her favourite past time now - being an apex predator.