Westminster Politics
- Thread starter altodevil
- Start date
Well I have just been watching the parade and there were a number of pro Ukrainians there.
It's a good example of what not to do isn't it? The dumb feckers think they are encouraging support when they are actually turning it off.
EDL = key bump patriots.
So much gammon.
So predictable and so utterly depressing. Broken country with utter scum in charge.
Oh, well this looks like news to me, so i'm guessing this would be on the BBC webs...
Wonder what @Maticmaker thinks.
This would not have happened if we hadn't had multiculturalism. Or something.
The boyz are not ‘avin it, you kant!!
Let’s defend the Cenotaph by attacking the police defending the Cenotaph.
What a surprise. The Tory controlled BBC have no reports on the far right, Braverman enabled idiots disrupting armistice.
We are living in a fascist state.
On the positive side from the reports it’s seem like there’s less than 3,000 far right supporters. It’s really only a tiny fraction of British society.
Weird how that same logic is never applied to other groups by the politicians and media, isn't it?
If this was taking place in the Middle East, these same people would be taking to Twitter and the Daily Mail comments section asking "where are the women?? why is it only men?"
Daily Mail trying their best to cover up who is doing the fighting
The really strange thing is in the UN votes the UK has been surprisingly pretty decent. Voted yesterday to declare Israeli settlements in Occupied Palestine as illegal. Means nothing overall sadly.
They're not in London this weekend.
HIstorically we have been, because of the relative independence of the Foreign Office. To be honest as the UK's power has waned, we have never really stepped out of line at the UN. Our last veto may have been as far back as Southern Rhodesia in the 1970s. I suspect that we hide behind the US veto a lot, and we are allowed to 'vote our conscience' as we know the measures will never pass.
https://twitter.com/theipaper/status/1723304790157832598?s=20
Let's see what mental gymnastics you try to explain how inappropriate this was…
So the march came and went, 300,000 people with close to no trouble from the solidarity marchers. Meanwhile a bunch of far-right smooth brained idiots, galvanised by Cruella decide to storm the cenotaph and fight the police. Really went to plan there eh Cruella?
Fortunately for her not many news outlets are reporting the fights with police in a direct way.
Cheers for this.
Why are the news outlets calling the far group counter protesters, they weren't there to protest but to get coked up/drunk and cause trouble
Because calling them "the EDL" would show that Braverman's dog whistling about how "Islamists" were going to cause the problems today turned out to be the complete and utter shite.
They’re also grouping them together with headlines like “92 arrested at protests today”, It really shouldn’t be that difficult to use more precise language, seen as the original protest passed without incident.
It'll be like the infamous Sex Pistols gig at Free Trade Hall. Hardly anyone was actually there, but all those who were will end up on the Starmer Party's 'Future Candidates Programme'.
Has Beaverman been sacked for inciting hate from government yet?
Not without incident, there was a woman who they are trying to arrest for a hate crime for having a sign implying that the Israelis are akin to fascists. It's good to see what the police budget gets spunked on isn't it?
Not yet, but it’s what she wants
Clear what he was doing. Him and the mail in quick media set up shocker.
Hooligans never left, they just left the terraces.
UK headlines so misleading - casual readers would think the protestors from the ceasefire March were the ones that attacked the police
That’s exactly what the DM want people to think.