Assuming it will actually work.
Westminster Politics
- Thread starter altodevil
- Start date
Assuming it will actually work.
Feck you Bojo.
Honestly. The man is a compulsive liar. He will say anything he can and try to kie his way out of any situation.
If anyone trusts a word he says, I would be amazed if the enquiry find him guilty though. It is all about politics, not the truth.
He has already admitted misleading Parliament, because it is obvious that he did.
But he now says that he did not 'intentially' mislead it.
Because he knows that it will be pretty difficult to conclusively prove his intentions. Intentions are subjective and not objective.
But he now says that he did not 'intentially' mislead it.
Because he knows that it will be pretty difficult to conclusively prove his intentions. Intentions are subjective and not objective.
Exactly. 'Partygate' did for Boris, it helped get him removed from office, that is as far as any group of politicians will go to turn on their own.
Boris is a 'side show' now. So Starmer needs to keep 'stum' on this topic, don't get embroiled in trying to bury the body twice, let the privileges committee do their business, 'shake the dust' etc and focus on the real problems.
Starmer with a murder right here.
Not that it makes much difference, but it was appointing Chris "Pincher by name, Pincher by nature" Pincher as a Whip whilst knowing full well he was a total wrong'un that did for Boris. Chris Pincher then attacked two men whilst totally battered at the commons bar.
They all defended Johnson to the nth degree on Partygate (and still are, like total morons)/lying to the house.
de Pfeffel denying everything.
I tried reading that and spat all over my screen
BBC saying that none of us understood the rules, so how can the comity say that Boris should have realised that the guidance had been broken? Typical.
I'll never get over how deeply weird Westminster is. It looks like they're just having fun.
Who is saying that on the BBC?
Agreed, it is deeply off-putting.
Seriously? Surely a guest saying that, or an interviewee and not the actually journalists?
Don't know here name the presenter on BBC News channel covering the comity.
Boris has some arrogance that I wish I had at times. The guy can stand over a dead body, with their blood on his hands and him twirling the machete around but claim confidently it wasn't him and he'd genuinely believe himself
fecking cnut. Basically saying that its cos he believed it, he didn't do anything wrong.
fecking cnut. Basically saying that its cos he believed it, he didn't do anything wrong.
He is, of course, lying through his teeth.
Not his biggest fan, far from it, but that was some diabolical brutality!This Johnson hearing is making me lose the will to live already.
I can't take this seriously whilst we still swear on a fecking bible.
You promise the biggest lie ever told that you won't tell a lie. Makes perfect sense
You promise the biggest lie ever told that you won't tell a lie. Makes perfect sense
Edgy as feck.I can't take this seriously whilst we still swear on a fecking bible.
You promise the biggest lie ever told that you won't tell a lie. Makes perfect sense
I like how he thinks that a bunch of drinks is essential. I wish someone would just say what about others? Hospitals etc. weren't having drinks to keep up morale
Me? No.
Johnson was always going to be up there lying his arse off. It just made me laugh that we still pretend to tell the truth over a book.
Meanwhile
Johnson is amazing.
The parties were crucial to the functioning of government, apparently, so exempt from the rules.
The parties were crucial to the functioning of government, apparently, so exempt from the rules.
Passing drinks to each other was exempt, but the Prime Minister ensured no one borrowed each other's pens.
It's bizarre.
But he said "hand on heart" .... I mean case closed.
Watched par of that. It insults my intelligence.
“..including former Tory party members” is what I’d love to have heard"I've prosecuted countless rapists"
That shouldnt matter. Not knowing the law it doesnt exempt you to habing to adhere to you and doesnt exhonerate you of a crime.
If i am new to the UK and i dont know that you drive on the leftxand i start driving on the right, the police will still fine me the same as if i would know
Or at least that is how it should work in a healthy judiciary system. Now, we are talking about how corrupt who will take care of this is because is boris
The thing is, this is what Johnson does. It’s ridiculous and we all find it shameful and pathetic but in the end it will work and it will result in once again no consequences for his actions.
And once again this behaviour will be reinforced as the right approach for him to take, just like it has been since he was a little wanker at Eton.
And once again this behaviour will be reinforced as the right approach for him to take, just like it has been since he was a little wanker at Eton.
I understood penis. What it would not be weird accounting how many kids bojo has
Sunak genuinely laughing it off sums the whole thing up
This is not about whether he broke the law or not. It is about whether on the balance of probability, he intentionally mislead parliament.
The key word is intentionally.
Yes. It is hilarious isn't it. And I am sure that the hundreds of thousands of people who lost a family member due to COVID will find it equally hilarious.
They can also consider recklessness too.