Drainy
Full Member
Her answer to everything is cut benefits and force the disabled back to into work.
The Labour position is that this is primarily being driven by poor funding to the NHS leading to backlogs in waiting lists.
Her answer to everything is cut benefits and force the disabled back to into work.
Her answer to everything is cut benefits and force the disabled back to into work.
Yeah but they're not called the Conservative Party and that's really all that matters.Labour 2024 are further right than Cameron’s 2010 Tories. Show me a shred of evidence otherwise.
Tories without the cronyism seems to be the campaign message and they will change if they get into power. I absolutely believe they will too. I’ve seen the donations that they’ve be accepting from big oil and the gambling industry and the water companies so what’s different about Labour that means they will resist the cronyism?Yeah but they're not called the Conservative Party and that's really all that matters.
Can you quote where you read that?TIL David Cameron was a good PM.
Her answer to everything is cut benefits and force the disabled back to into work.
10% lobbyist is a fairly low number I would have thought.
Cameron was personally in favour of it, despite many Tories still being opposed. That’s the point I’m making - Starmer/Reeves, on the current evidence, would never be so bold, as they won’t appear to stand for anything other than getting into power.That was the Lib Dem influence, and it was/is where the UK is at socially so amending the legislation to reflect that is an easy thing to do.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Ms Reeves signalled Labour now plans to fund their plans through savings to future government spending, rather than an alternative tax rise.
"We will go through every pound spent, every tax raised, and make that sure we can continue to fund those commitments," she said.
"We will identify the savings we can make to fund this," she said, underlining the party's election manifesto would be "fully costed and fully funded". But she did not offer further details, adding the party would first need to go through the government's plans in an "orderly way" before it would be in a position to do so.
Shy Tories. They can now openly vote for Tory policies and try to claim the moral high ground as well.This current version of Labour are the greatest thing to happen to anyone with Tory values who can look beyond the colour of the rosette.
Hope you aren't expecting a pension from the government when you retire thenI'm glad National Insurance will be scrapped. It probably does nothing anyway and can be paid for by getting scroungers back to work.
To be honest, I think people younger than and including millennials shouldn't be expecting a state pension.Hope you aren't expecting a pension from the government when you retire then
Why not?To be honest, I think people younger than and including millennials shouldn't be expecting a state pension.
Why not?
You missed out Thatcher, but I would argue that anyone who had to live thru Boris/Truss/Rishi deserves one!We haven't had to live through the war, miners strikes or the cold war, innit? Not done anything to deserve one.
As a millennial, I'm not expecting to receive a state pension. And if I do, I'm not expecting to be able to receive it at a meaningful age where it would make a difference. Probably die before I'm eligible to claim one.
The country is going to be too broke by then. I am a millennial.Why not?
The country is going to be too broke by then. I am a millennial.
Led by Donkeys nail it again!
Why not?
Led by Donkeys nail it again!
No argument there, the system was set up when people retired at 65 and died within 5-10 years, now a large % of people can realistically live 20-25 years - that's why the pension age keeps rising.Because despite general ignorance, "I've paid in all my life" national insurance and income tax isn't going into a savings account and has already been spent. State pension is being paid out of tax receipts. If their isn't enough tax coming in to cover pensions then no more pensions. Considering the ratio between people of working age and pensioners is going the wrong way, the the concept of state provided pensions is unsustainable without a radical change to our tax system i.e. wealth taxes etc.
A large percentage of people under 40 will never be able to retire. No final salry pensions, low % of annual salary paid into a private pension, tiny state pension (if it still exists) and no speculative property wealth to cash in on. Good times ahead!
Ok. So what would you then do with the vast swathes of impoverished geriatrics who didn't top that up for whatever reason?No argument there, the system was set up when people retired at 65 and died within 5-10 years, now a large % of people can realistically live 20-25 years - that's why the pension age keeps rising.
Something along the lines of they goverment gives every new born kid 10K in a retirement account that cannot be touched until retirement age is the way firward, individuals would be allowed to add more money over time if they choose but that's it, no pension
Soylent Green?Ok. So what would you then do with the vast swathes of impoverished geriatrics who didn't top that up for whatever reason?
Starting with 10K from birth in a retirement fund invested in the usual ways for 60 years would be worth the best part of 2 million without any top upsOk. So what would you then do with the vast swathes of impoverished geriatrics who didn't top that up for whatever reason?