Weird feelings of football

West Brom never win a game but comfortably end up mid table with around 45 points every year.

Totally agree with this one. They're in 11th and they will quietly finish in 11th, having never been higher than 11th or lower than 11th.
 
West Brom never win a game but comfortably end up mid table with around 45 points every year.

Tony Pulis is the perfect match for them - that just about sums him up as a manager in general.
 
teddy18.jpg


Teddy Sheringham circa 1985

image.jpg


Teddy Sheringham 2016

Man has looked the same age forever
 
Every time before we play Arsenal, I think that they're no longer a direct rival and therefore no hate should be generated. The day of the game someone inevitable shares a video of Arsenal-United fights and I regain my hatred for them.
 
No player in Italian football has a shirt number below 20.
 
Teddy Sheringham never actually scored from the corner routine that is named after him.

David Beckham had a better free-kick conversion ratio than penalty-conversion ratio.
 
Football started looking modern somewhere around 2000. Before that it was on a grainy picture, with baggy kits, mitre footballs and shit pitches.
 
Samir Nasri joined Inter Milan in 2014 and has been in and out of the side
Heart of Midlothian Football Club is actually named Hearts of Midlothian Football Club
Celtic are historically superior/better than Rangers
 
Teams can only win 1 penalty shootout in a single knockout tournament. If they play a 2nd, they lose.
 
Football started looking modern somewhere around 2000. Before that it was on a grainy picture, with baggy kits, mitre footballs and shit pitches.

Not only that, but what looked modern in, say, 2006 or 2007, actually looks kind of out of date now. I remember watching old PL highlights from about a decade before that and everything looked so 90s. Now the same can be said for a decade ago: Rooney with actual hair, Ronaldinho with actual footballing ability, Andy Gray and Richard Keys with credible careers, and Jose Mourinho without completely grey hair. It's less that it looks out of date, to an extent I think, and more that all the people involved then who are still involved now looked so much younger then.
 
Celtic are historically superior/better than Rangers

Likely due to the European success. Rangers have obviously been more successful in the league domestically, but when both sides have 40+ titles the discrepancies begin to seem quite minor in comparison. Celtic winning a European Cup and reaching another final gave them that elevated status to an extent: Rangers had some great teams but never quite managed to produce one (at least in a modern context, since we'd know little to analyse pre-world war teams) on the level of Stein's greatest side.

Of course, Rangers' recent years in the wilderness probably haven't helped them in this regard since it's ushered in a new era of Celtic dominance. Not that it's been particularly impressive dominance, mind.
 
Before Pep Guardiola, playing the long ball and shooting from distance was seen as playing direct football. Nowadays, that exact same footballing philosophy is seen as neanderthal.