Weird feelings of football

The 5-1 game vs Germany was the last time England played against a decent side in a qualification match, it's been Ukraine/Poland/Slovenia/San Marino ever since.
 
The 5-1 game vs Germany was the last time England played against a decent side in a qualification match, it's been Ukraine/Poland/Slovenia/San Marino ever since.
Did u forget the EC 2008 qualifications?
 
Every good player is "the first one to arrive and last one to leave training", according to their teammates.
 
50% of the lower-table teams in La Liga are coached by a tactically visionary, yet largely unknown manager from Latin America.
 
If somebody says "oh, he always scores against us" about a player, that player will have scored roughly one goal in the last twelve games against that person's club.
 
Defensive midfielders are very rarely blonde haired.
 
Defensive midfielders tend to be boring footballers. Never flashy, always carry another day at the office attitude, typically industrious -- and for some reason, many are bald.
 
This whole 'number 6' has been said a lot more, I mean a number 6 to me is a center back. 4 should be the defensive, I mean think of shirt numbers ffs

pees me off no end.

NO END
 
It varies. In The UK a 4 was mostly a midfielder and 6 a defender. In Europe and South America, 2,3,4,5 is your back four and a 6 is a midfielder. To me, the latter makes more sense. Why would your back four be 2,3,5,6 and the 4 go in to the next line?

1
2 4 5 3
6
8 10
7 ------ 11
9
It's daft we've started doing that anyway, naming positions by numbers. It only seems to apply to 6, 8, 9 and 10. It's a bit hipster, but I'm also guilty of doing it. "An 8" is easier than "box to box midfielder".
 
Everytime there's a good prospect or a wonderkid in Football Manager, he becomes crap in real life.
 
Anelka is still playing somewhere in England.
Roberto Carlos has looked exactly the same since he was 17.
The grass is darker at Old Trafford than anywhere else.
 
West Brom don't buy or sell players. They just keep the same hoard of average players year on year.
 
Every time there is a documentary about a footballer they always seems to find this footballers first teacher, and this teacher will always tell you that this footballer always had a football with him wherever he went, also that he could be a bit handful at times - "but he was a great kid!".
 
It varies. In The UK a 4 was mostly a midfielder and 6 a defender. In Europe and South America, 2,3,4,5 is your back four and a 6 is a midfielder. To me, the latter makes more sense. Why would your back four be 2,3,5,6 and the 4 go in to the next line?

1
2 4 5 3
6
8 10
7 ------ 11
9
It's daft we've started doing that anyway, naming positions by numbers. It only seems to apply to 6, 8, 9 and 10. It's a bit hipster, but I'm also guilty of doing it. "An 8" is easier than "box to box midfielder".

The english numbers aren't linked to a back four but a back two.
 
It varies. In The UK a 4 was mostly a midfielder and 6 a defender. In Europe and South America, 2,3,4,5 is your back four and a 6 is a midfielder. To me, the latter makes more sense. Why would your back four be 2,3,5,6 and the 4 go in to the next line?

1
2 4 5 3
6
8 10
7 ------ 11
9
It's daft we've started doing that anyway, naming positions by numbers. It only seems to apply to 6, 8, 9 and 10. It's a bit hipster, but I'm also guilty of doing it. "An 8" is easier than "box to box midfielder".
Our numbers are linked back to the 50s and 60s and the systems used then
 
Defensive midfielders tend to be boring footballers. Never flashy, always carry another day at the office attitude, typically industrious -- and for some reason, many are bald.
You're not wrong on this. I can't think of a skillful defensive mid. Maybe Vieira.
 
The english numbers aren't linked to a back four but a back two.

Our numbers are linked back to the 50s and 60s and the systems used then

Squad numbers originated with the 2-3-5 formation, but the numbers evolved as formations evolved. It wasn't until the early/mid 90s that squad numbers were given to individual players rather than positions. Formations changed enormously during the late 60s and in to the 70s and 80s. Hence a 6 being widely known as a defensive midfielder, and not the 4 or the 5, even though 4s and 5s were midfielders originally.

Outside of the UK, the 2,3,4,5 back four became quite universal, as did the 6 and 8 central midfield, and 10 being anywhere between the midfield and a striker. When we refer to squad numbers as positions today, that evolution is what is being referred to, and not the 2-3-5.
 
Squad numbers originated with the 2-3-5 formation, but the numbers evolved as formations evolved. It wasn't until the early/mid 90s that squad numbers were given to individual players rather than positions. Formations changed enormously during the late 60s and in to the 70s and 80s. Hence a 6 being widely known as a defensive midfielder, and not the 4 or the 5, even though 4s and 5s were midfielders originally.

Outside of the UK, the 2,3,4,5 back four became quite universal, as did the 6 and 8 central midfield, and 10 being anywhere between the midfield and a striker. When we refer to squad numbers as positions today, that evolution is what is being referred to, and not the 2-3-5.

I know.
 
Every time we start with a lineup approved by the Cafe, we are shite. And vice-versa.